Knowing that a third-party research firm can add value to the IPO marketing process by giving an independent opinion, Omar hires Miriam Halawi, CFA. She is a former colleague who started her own research firm two years ago. Halawi allows Omar to use her research report in all Sahara marketing material with proper acknowledgement. After extensive research, Halawi makes a long-term buy recommendation of Sahara. But she qualifies the recommendation with a high-risk rating, knowing the IPO targets retail investors along with institutional investors. Omar invites Halawi to travel across the region with him to promote the IPO. Halawi agrees but only if she is paid a flat fee.
To avoid violating the Standards of Professional Conduct, Halawi’s most appropriate action with regard to the regional marketing trip is to:
A.
act for the benefit of Sahara.
B.
not attend any marketing trip.
C.
disclose how she is compensated.
我的理解：
本题考查独立客观性与冲突披露。
题干说H答应与O一同参加路演，H同意了但要求只接受一个固定费用。
那H直接拒绝不是更不违反准则吗？
麻烦老师详细解释一下
1.这道题的逻辑点
2.我错误的逻辑点
