开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Shawnxz · 2024年06月22日

如下

NO.PZ2022062601000022

问题如下:

Randy and Matt are college students majoring in finance, and they discuss how to ultimately determine the foundation's evaluation process for alternative investment performance. Randy said to Matt," You measure the performance of private equity investments based on the broad stock market index, and private credit based on the investment grade fixed income index. Both targets a benchmark post tax return of over 200 basis points. These are also in line with industry practice. We will use the quarterly report values of each fund and the market value of the index to measure returns and return volatility. A difference between publicly traded and alternative asset components in portfolios is that foundations need to establish procedures to monitor alternative investment managers and processes."

Randy's comment on alternative investment evaluation to Matt is most inappropriate in the following aspects:

选项:

A.

benchmarks for private investments.

B.

valuation and risk of alternative investments.

C.

the need to monitor managers and investment processes.

解释:

B is correct. Infrequent pricing (in this case, quarterly pricing) may make measuring volatility and correlation difficult because there is too little available observational data. In addition, stale pricing and the use of appraisals for valuation lead to smoothing effects (swings in market values are muted), which actually underestimates return volatility and reduces the correlation with measured returns of publicly traded assets, making the diversification benefits of alternative assets appear better than they actually are. When measuring the performance of alternative investments, efforts must be made to correct these biases.

A is incorrect. Although no benchmark for alternative investments is perfect, Randy's benchmark is in line with industry practice and is appropriate considering the nature of the investment (non venture for private equity and direct lending for private credit).

C is incorrect. For alternative investments, investors do need to pay attention to many aspects of the investment process, including key-person risks, conflicts of interest between general partners and investors, style drift, client and asset turnover, and the reliability of service providers. Investors do not need to monitor managers or investment processes when investing in publicly traded assets, as these assets are often more transparent and subject to stricter regulations.

知识点考察:Asset Allocation Approaches

B 是正确的。不频繁的定价(在这种情况下为季度定价)会使衡量波动性和相关性变得困难,因为可用的观测值太少。此外,陈旧的定价和使用评估进行估值会导致平滑效应(市场价值的波动减弱),这实际上低估了回报波动性并降低了与公开交易资产的衡量回报相关性,使得另类资产的多元化收益似乎优于他们实际情况。在衡量另类投资的表现时,必须努力纠正这些偏差。


A 不正确。尽管另类投资没有完美的基准,但 Randy 确定的基准符合行业惯例,并且考虑到投资的性质(私募股权的非风险投资和私人信贷的直接贷款)是适当的。

C 不正确。对于另类投资,投资者确实需要关注投资过程的许多方面,包括关键人物风险、普通合伙人与投资者之间的利益冲突、风格漂移、客户和资产周转率、服务提供商的可靠性等在。一般来说,投资者在投资公开交易资产时不需要监控经理或投资过程,因为这些资产往往更透明,监管更严格。

这里是对应这句话吗?“We will use the quarterly report values of each fund and the market value of the index to measure returns and return volatility.

因为他们要季度报告,但是真实情况是没有这么频繁的估值,所以是错的,理解对吗?

Xiaochong · 2024年07月06日

A follow up questions: so what should they do for measurement? in reality PE/RE funds they do produce quarterly report and that's (mostly likely) the only source they can use to measure the R and risk.

2 个答案
已采纳答案

伯恩_品职助教 · 2024年06月23日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


对的

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

伯恩_品职助教 · 2024年07月06日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同学,真实世界也没办法季度报告,能季度报告的另类一定那些流动性好的投资。流动性不好的投资怎么报告呢?

比如买了一个林地,一个季度后怎么报价?如果没有附近的相似情况的成交价怎么报价,怎么给客户处投资报告,除非现在刚好有投资者要买其中一部分的林地才有报价才有相关的其他班报告的行程,否则报告能报告什么,报告林场现在的生长情况?林场又不是农场3个月如果没有天灾基本没什么变化

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 204

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022062601000022 问题如下 Ran anMatt are college stunts majoring in finance, anthey scuss how to ultimately termine the fountion's evaluation process for alternative investment performance. Ran saito Matt,\" You measure the performanof private equity investments baseon the brostomarket inx, anprivate cret baseon the investment gra fixeincome inx. Both targets a benchmark post treturn of over 200 basis points. These are also in line with instry practice. We will use the quarterly report values of eafunanthe market value of the inx to measure returns anreturn volatility. A fferenbetween publicly traanalternative asset components in portfolios is thfountions neeto establish proceres to monitor alternative investment managers anprocesses.\"Ran's comment on alternative investment evaluation to Matt is most inappropriate in the following aspects: A.benchmarks for private investments. B.valuation anrisk of alternative investments. C.the neeto monitor managers aninvestment processes. B is correct. Infrequent pricing (in this case, quarterly pricing) mmake measuring volatility ancorrelation fficult because there is too little available observationtIn aition, stale pricing anthe use of appraisals for valuation leto smoothing effects (swings in market values are mute, whiactually unrestimates return volatility anreces the correlation with measurereturns of publicly traassets, making the versification benefits of alternative assets appebetter ththey actually are. When measuring the performanof alternative investments, efforts must ma to correthese biases.A is incorrect. Although no benchmark for alternative investments is perfect, Ran's benchmark is in line with instry practianis appropriate consiring the nature of the investment (non venture for private equity anrelenng for private cret).C is incorrect. For alternative investments, investors neeto pattention to many aspects of the investment process, inclung key-person risks, conflicts of interest between generpartners aninvestors, style ift, client anasset turnover, anthe reliability of serviprovirs. Investors not neeto monitor managers or investment processes when investing in publicly traassets, these assets are often more transparent ansubjeto stricter regulations.知识点考察Asset Allocation ApproachesB 是正确的。不频繁的定价(在这种情况下为季度定价)会使衡量波动性和相关性变得困难,因为可用的观测值太少。此外,陈旧的定价和使用评估进行估值会导致平滑效应(市场价值的波动减弱),这实际上低估了回报波动性并降低了与公开交易资产的衡量回报相关性,使得另类资产的多元化收益似乎优于他们实际情况。在衡量另类投资的表现时,必须努力纠正这些偏差。 A 不正确。尽管另类投资没有完美的基准,但 Ran 确定的基准符合行业惯例,并且考虑到投资的性质(私募股权的非风险投资和私人信贷的直接贷款)是适当的。C 不正确。对于另类投资,投资者确实需要关注投资过程的许多方面,包括关键人物风险、普通合伙人与投资者之间的利益冲突、风格漂移、客户和资产周转率、服务提供商的可靠性等在。一般来说,投资者在投资公开交易资产时不需要监控经理或投资过程,因为这些资产往往更透明,监管更严格。 如题

2024-07-31 20:45 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022062601000022 问题如下 Ran anMatt are college stunts majoring in finance, anthey scuss how to ultimately termine the fountion's evaluation process for alternative investment performance. Ran saito Matt,\" You measure the performanof private equity investments baseon the brostomarket inx, anprivate cret baseon the investment gra fixeincome inx. Both targets a benchmark post treturn of over 200 basis points. These are also in line with instry practice. We will use the quarterly report values of eafunanthe market value of the inx to measure returns anreturn volatility. A fferenbetween publicly traanalternative asset components in portfolios is thfountions neeto establish proceres to monitor alternative investment managers anprocesses.\"Ran's comment on alternative investment evaluation to Matt is most inappropriate in the following aspects: A.benchmarks for private investments. B.valuation anrisk of alternative investments. C.the neeto monitor managers aninvestment processes. B is correct. Infrequent pricing (in this case, quarterly pricing) mmake measuring volatility ancorrelation fficult because there is too little available observationtIn aition, stale pricing anthe use of appraisals for valuation leto smoothing effects (swings in market values are mute, whiactually unrestimates return volatility anreces the correlation with measurereturns of publicly traassets, making the versification benefits of alternative assets appebetter ththey actually are. When measuring the performanof alternative investments, efforts must ma to correthese biases.A is incorrect. Although no benchmark for alternative investments is perfect, Ran's benchmark is in line with instry practianis appropriate consiring the nature of the investment (non venture for private equity anrelenng for private cret).C is incorrect. For alternative investments, investors neeto pattention to many aspects of the investment process, inclung key-person risks, conflicts of interest between generpartners aninvestors, style ift, client anasset turnover, anthe reliability of serviprovirs. Investors not neeto monitor managers or investment processes when investing in publicly traassets, these assets are often more transparent ansubjeto stricter regulations.知识点考察Asset Allocation ApproachesB 是正确的。不频繁的定价(在这种情况下为季度定价)会使衡量波动性和相关性变得困难,因为可用的观测值太少。此外,陈旧的定价和使用评估进行估值会导致平滑效应(市场价值的波动减弱),这实际上低估了回报波动性并降低了与公开交易资产的衡量回报相关性,使得另类资产的多元化收益似乎优于他们实际情况。在衡量另类投资的表现时,必须努力纠正这些偏差。 A 不正确。尽管另类投资没有完美的基准,但 Ran 确定的基准符合行业惯例,并且考虑到投资的性质(私募股权的非风险投资和私人信贷的直接贷款)是适当的。C 不正确。对于另类投资,投资者确实需要关注投资过程的许多方面,包括关键人物风险、普通合伙人与投资者之间的利益冲突、风格漂移、客户和资产周转率、服务提供商的可靠性等在。一般来说,投资者在投资公开交易资产时不需要监控经理或投资过程,因为这些资产往往更透明,监管更严格。 能理解b是错的,但a这里(虽是行业惯例)为什么会用IG inx。。。这两个inx 选择不是很明白(虽然知道不完美,但总有些优点吧?)

2024-07-28 14:26 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022062601000022 问题如下 Ran anMatt are college stunts majoring in finance, anthey scuss how to ultimately termine the fountion's evaluation process for alternative investment performance. Ran saito Matt,\" You measure the performanof private equity investments baseon the brostomarket inx, anprivate cret baseon the investment gra fixeincome inx. Both targets a benchmark post treturn of over 200 basis points. These are also in line with instry practice. We will use the quarterly report values of eafunanthe market value of the inx to measure returns anreturn volatility. A fferenbetween publicly traanalternative asset components in portfolios is thfountions neeto establish proceres to monitor alternative investment managers anprocesses.\"Ran's comment on alternative investment evaluation to Matt is most inappropriate in the following aspects: A.benchmarks for private investments. B.valuation anrisk of alternative investments. C.the neeto monitor managers aninvestment processes. B is correct. Infrequent pricing (in this case, quarterly pricing) mmake measuring volatility ancorrelation fficult because there is too little available observationtIn aition, stale pricing anthe use of appraisals for valuation leto smoothing effects (swings in market values are mute, whiactually unrestimates return volatility anreces the correlation with measurereturns of publicly traassets, making the versification benefits of alternative assets appebetter ththey actually are. When measuring the performanof alternative investments, efforts must ma to correthese biases.A is incorrect. Although no benchmark for alternative investments is perfect, Ran's benchmark is in line with instry practianis appropriate consiring the nature of the investment (non venture for private equity anrelenng for private cret).C is incorrect. For alternative investments, investors neeto pattention to many aspects of the investment process, inclung key-person risks, conflicts of interest between generpartners aninvestors, style ift, client anasset turnover, anthe reliability of serviprovirs. Investors not neeto monitor managers or investment processes when investing in publicly traassets, these assets are often more transparent ansubjeto stricter regulations.知识点考察Asset Allocation ApproachesB 是正确的。不频繁的定价(在这种情况下为季度定价)会使衡量波动性和相关性变得困难,因为可用的观测值太少。此外,陈旧的定价和使用评估进行估值会导致平滑效应(市场价值的波动减弱),这实际上低估了回报波动性并降低了与公开交易资产的衡量回报相关性,使得另类资产的多元化收益似乎优于他们实际情况。在衡量另类投资的表现时,必须努力纠正这些偏差。 A 不正确。尽管另类投资没有完美的基准,但 Ran 确定的基准符合行业惯例,并且考虑到投资的性质(私募股权的非风险投资和私人信贷的直接贷款)是适当的。C 不正确。对于另类投资,投资者确实需要关注投资过程的许多方面,包括关键人物风险、普通合伙人与投资者之间的利益冲突、风格漂移、客户和资产周转率、服务提供商的可靠性等在。一般来说,投资者在投资公开交易资产时不需要监控经理或投资过程,因为这些资产往往更透明,监管更严格。 因为pe之类的不存在季度报告,所以b本身就是错的,老师在别的提问中也回答了首先没有季度这种频率的估值数据,其次季度数据也不够频繁(因为看到一个回答中提到了缺失中间月份估值),那么应该用什么数据来进行估值呢?

2024-07-28 10:49 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2022062601000022 问题如下 Ran anMatt are college stunts majoring in finance, anthey scuss how to ultimately termine the fountion's evaluation process for alternative investment performance. Ran saito Matt,\" You measure the performanof private equity investments baseon the brostomarket inx, anprivate cret baseon the investment gra fixeincome inx. Both targets a benchmark post treturn of over 200 basis points. These are also in line with instry practice. We will use the quarterly report values of eafunanthe market value of the inx to measure returns anreturn volatility. A fferenbetween publicly traanalternative asset components in portfolios is thfountions neeto establish proceres to monitor alternative investment managers anprocesses.\"Ran's comment on alternative investment evaluation to Matt is most inappropriate in the following aspects: A.benchmarks for private investments. B.valuation anrisk of alternative investments. C.the neeto monitor managers aninvestment processes. B is correct. Infrequent pricing (in this case, quarterly pricing) mmake measuring volatility ancorrelation fficult because there is too little available observationtIn aition, stale pricing anthe use of appraisals for valuation leto smoothing effects (swings in market values are mute, whiactually unrestimates return volatility anreces the correlation with measurereturns of publicly traassets, making the versification benefits of alternative assets appebetter ththey actually are. When measuring the performanof alternative investments, efforts must ma to correthese biases.A is incorrect. Although no benchmark for alternative investments is perfect, Ran's benchmark is in line with instry practianis appropriate consiring the nature of the investment (non venture for private equity anrelenng for private cret).C is incorrect. For alternative investments, investors neeto pattention to many aspects of the investment process, inclung key-person risks, conflicts of interest between generpartners aninvestors, style ift, client anasset turnover, anthe reliability of serviprovirs. Investors not neeto monitor managers or investment processes when investing in publicly traassets, these assets are often more transparent ansubjeto stricter regulations.知识点考察Asset Allocation ApproachesB 是正确的。不频繁的定价(在这种情况下为季度定价)会使衡量波动性和相关性变得困难,因为可用的观测值太少。此外,陈旧的定价和使用评估进行估值会导致平滑效应(市场价值的波动减弱),这实际上低估了回报波动性并降低了与公开交易资产的衡量回报相关性,使得另类资产的多元化收益似乎优于他们实际情况。在衡量另类投资的表现时,必须努力纠正这些偏差。 A 不正确。尽管另类投资没有完美的基准,但 Ran 确定的基准符合行业惯例,并且考虑到投资的性质(私募股权的非风险投资和私人信贷的直接贷款)是适当的。C 不正确。对于另类投资,投资者确实需要关注投资过程的许多方面,包括关键人物风险、普通合伙人与投资者之间的利益冲突、风格漂移、客户和资产周转率、服务提供商的可靠性等在。一般来说,投资者在投资公开交易资产时不需要监控经理或投资过程,因为这些资产往往更透明,监管更严格。 老师,B是从无法提供季度数据的角度理解呢(即压根没法提供数据),还是从季度数据不准确的角度理解呢(即提供了,但是提供的很少)

2024-07-21 23:27 1 · 回答