开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

大兵张嘎 · 2024年06月22日

为什么越差的越需要重点关注？

  1. ESG
  2. Engagement and stewardship

NO.PZ2022120701000063

问题如下：

A portfolio has equal holdings of the following investments:


According to PRI’s guide to ESG Engagement for Fixed Income Investors, which investment is most likely to be highest priority for engagement?

选项：

A.Bond 1

B.Bond 2

C.Bond 3

解释：

The guide recommends prioritizing engagement with issuers that have weak ESG scores and lower credit quality Bond 1 has the lowest credit score and along with Bond 3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritized because there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower credit quality are prioritized because they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts

为什么越差的越需要重点关注？时间成本多余吗？

添加评论
1 个答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年06月23日

嗨，从没放弃的小努力你好：


在PRI（负责任投资原则）的《固定收益投资者的ESG参与指南》中，建议优先与ESG评分较低且信用质量较差的发行人进行接触。这背后的逻辑和理由如下：

  1. 改进潜力：ESG评分较低的发行人往往存在更大的改进空间。通过与这些发行人进行接触，可以推动他们在环境、社会和治理（ESG）方面做出更大的改进，从而带来更大的正面影响。
  2. 风险管理：信用质量较低的发行人更容易受到负面ESG事件的影响。优先与这些发行人接触可以帮助他们改善ESG表现，降低潜在的风险，从而保护投资者的利益。
  3. 价值创造：通过推动ESG改进，可以提高这些发行人的长期可持续性和稳定性，从而提高债券的信用质量。这对于投资者来说，不仅有助于管理风险，还可以带来潜在的财务回报。
  4. 责任投资：作为负责任的投资者，推动ESG改进是履行社会责任的一部分。通过与ESG评分较低的发行人接触，投资者可以在推动可持续发展和社会进步方面发挥积极作用。

虽然优先与ESG评分较低和信用质量较差的发行人接触可能会花费更多的时间和资源，但从长期来看，这种策略有助于改善整体投资组合的风险管理和回报潜力。因此，虽然短期内时间成本较高，但长期收益和风险管理的改善使这种策略具有合理性和必要性。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 125

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022120701000063 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts 为什么信用质量较低意味着他们不能够吸收ESG的负面影响？二者之间的关联是什么？

2024-06-17 22:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts 你们眼睛瞎了？1和3的ESG score是一样的，什么叫3是最低的分数？？？

2024-05-08 19:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1B.Bon2C.Bon3The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts既然债权参与有限，那为什么选a这种信用低，评分低的

2024-04-25 15:38 4 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts 3的信用评级高，但esg评分低，当esg暴雷的时候3的损失是更大的。 1的信用评级低，esg评分也低，减少投入就好啊。

2024-03-24 13:06 2 · 回答