开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

甜甜 · 2024年06月20日

AC

NO.PZ2024022002000074

问题如下:

As a frequent user of various online social platforms, Hezi Cohen, who is pursuing the CFA designation, often resorts to abbreviating content due to character limits, including CFA trademarks. He actively engages in professional forums and writes about retirement planning, his field of expertise, on blogs. Cohen believes that presenting himself as a retirement planning expert enhances his reputation and client base. Which of his online practices is most likely in accordance with the CFA Institute’s ethical guidelines?

选项:

A.Abbreviating including trademarks. B.Self-proclaiming as a retirement planning specialist. C.Discussing general topics from the CFA curriculum on blogs.

解释:

Option B is correct. Cohen’s self-proclamation as a retirement planning specialist, assuming it accurately reflects his expertise, aligns with CFA ethical standards. The standards allow for such claims provided they are truthful and not exaggerated.

AC分别违反什么standards?还有A啥意思阿

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年06月21日

选项A提到的“Abbreviating including trademarks”意味着在在线社交平台上缩写内容,包括缩写CFA的商标或相关术语。这种做法可能违反了CFA 多条准则:

  1. Standard I(C) - Misrepresentation: 如果缩写导致信息不准确或误导他人,就可能构成虚假陈述。例如,如果缩写使得CFA商标或相关术语的含义变得模糊或误导,就可能违反了这一标准。
  2. Standard VII(B) - Additional Compensation Arrangements: 尽管这一点与直接缩写商标关系不大,但如果通过缩写或误导性使用CFA商标来为个人谋取不正当利益,可能触及到这一标准。

对于选项C,“Discussing general topics from the CFA curriculum on blogs”可能违反了以下准则:

  1. Standard I(A) - Knowledge of the Law: 如果在博客上讨论CFA课程中的一般主题时,未经授权地使用了CFA Institute的版权材料或违反了版权法,就可能违反这一标准。
  2. Standard I(C) - Misrepresentation: 如果在讨论中错误地表述了CFA课程的内容或误导了读者对CFA课程的理解,这也可能构成虚假陈述。
  3. Standard VII(A) - Independence and Objectivity: 如果在讨论中未能保持客观,而是过分推销或偏颇地解释CFA课程的内容,可能违反了独立性和客观性的要求。


  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 107

    浏览
相关问题