开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

mimi · 2024年06月17日

答案解析中说“信用质量较低的发行人被优先考虑，因为他们不太能够吸收 ESG 的负面影响”，为什么？

  1. ESG
  2. Engagement and stewardship

NO.PZ2022120701000063

问题如下：

A portfolio has equal holdings of the following investments:


According to PRI’s guide to ESG Engagement for Fixed Income Investors, which investment is most likely to be highest priority for engagement?

选项：

A.Bond 1 B.Bond 2 C.Bond 3

解释：

The guide recommends prioritizing engagement with issuers that have weak ESG scores and lower credit quality Bond 1 has the lowest credit score and along with Bond 3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritized because there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower credit quality are prioritized because they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts

为什么信用质量较低意味着他们不能够吸收ESG的负面影响？二者之间的关联是什么？

添加评论
1 个答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年06月19日

嗨，从没放弃的小努力你好：


低信用质量与无法吸收ESG负面影响的关联

  1. 财务脆弱性：信用质量较低的企业通常财务状况较为脆弱，现金流紧张，资产负债表不稳固。当这些企业面临ESG方面的负面影响（例如环境罚款、法律诉讼或社会责任成本）时，它们可能没有足够的财务资源来应对这些额外的支出或损失。
  2. 融资成本增加：ESG评分较低可能会导致企业在资本市场上融资成本增加。投资者越来越重视ESG表现，评分低的企业可能需要支付更高的利息来吸引投资者。如果企业的信用质量本身就较低，融资成本的进一步上升会加剧其财务压力。
  3. 市场和监管风险：低ESG评分的企业更容易受到市场和监管的负面反应，例如投资者撤资、监管处罚或社会舆论压力。这些风险会对企业的经营造成直接的财务影响，而信用质量较低的企业更难以在这些冲击中维持稳定。


----------------------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 174

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022120701000063问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1B.Bon2C.Bon3The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts为什么越差的越需要重点关注？时间成本多余吗？

2024-06-22 13:33 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts 你们眼睛瞎了？1和3的ESG score是一样的，什么叫3是最低的分数？？？

2024-05-08 19:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1B.Bon2C.Bon3The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts既然债权参与有限，那为什么选a这种信用低，评分低的

2024-04-25 15:38 4 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts 3的信用评级高，但esg评分低，当esg暴雷的时候3的损失是更大的。 1的信用评级低，esg评分也低，减少投入就好啊。

2024-03-24 13:06 2 · 回答