开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

139****0989 · 2024年05月26日

这题不理解,请解释说明。

NO.PZ2024021802000071

问题如下:

Which of the following is most consistent with a discretionary portfolio management approach to ESG integration?

选项:

A.Investment strategies use a custom index, typically with exclusion criteria

B.Bottom-up financial analysis is performed along with the consideration of ESG factors

C.Portfolios comprise a much larger number of securities compared to portfolios using quantitative strategies

解释:

A. Incorrect because this describes index-based investment within the quantitative management approach. Traditionally, passive or index-based strategies have been the most popular investment vehicles. These impose a custom index, typically with exclusion criteria.

B. Correct because discretionary ESG investment strategies most commonly take the form of a fundamental portfolio approach. A portfolio manager would work to complement bottom-up financial analysis alongside the consideration of ESG factors to reinforce the investment thesis of a particular holding. The portfolio manager would then work to understand the aggregate risk at the portfolio level across all factors to understand correlation and event risks, and potential shocks to the portfolio.

C. Incorrect because this describes the quantitative approach. Quantitative investment strategies are, broadly speaking, rules-based approaches employing the statistical application of financial and/or non-financial factors to drive securities selection. … Where discretionary strategies often focus on depth within a portfolio, manifested through a portfolio of few, more concentrated holdings, quantitative strategies focus on breadth, using a much larger portfolio of holdings to target risk and volatility-adjusted returns.

这题不理解,请解释说明。

1 个答案

王岑 · 2024年05月28日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


这个问题问的是在ESG整合中哪一种选项最符合自由裁量型(discretionary)投资组合管理方法。

选项 A:"Investment strategies use a custom index, typically with exclusion criteria"(投资策略使用自定义指数,通常具有排除标准)

选项 B:"Bottom-up financial analysis is performed along with the consideration of ESG factors"(进行自下而上的财务分析,并考虑ESG因素)

选项 C:"Portfolios comprise a much larger number of securities compared to portfolios using quantitative strategies"(与使用定量策略的投资组合相比,投资组合包含更多的证券)

选项 A描述的是定量(quantitative) 管理方法中的基于指数的投资。传统上,被动或基于指数的策略是最受欢迎的投资工具,这些策略会施加自定义指数,通常具有排除标准。因此,这个选项是错误的,因为它不符合自由裁量型投资组合管理方法。

选项 B是正确的,因为自由裁量型(discretionary)的ESG投资策略通常采取基本面投资组合方法。投资组合经理会结合自下而上的财务分析和ESG因素的考虑,以加强特定持股的投资论点。投资组合经理将努力理解投资组合在所有因素上的总体风险,以理解相关性、事件风险以及对投资组合的潜在冲击。

选项 C描述的是定量方法。定量投资策略广义上是规则基础的方法,运用金融和/或非金融因素的统计应用来驱动证券选择。而自由裁量型策略(discretionary)通常专注于投资组合的深度,表现为较少、更集中的持股,定量策略则专注于广度,使用更多的持股来针对风险和波动率调整后的回报。

所以我们能看出,选项B最符合自由裁量型投资组合管理方法对ESG整合的描述。自由裁量型投资组合管理强调由投资组合经理根据基本面分析和ESG因素做出个性化的投资决策。这种方法通常涉及对少数几个持股进行深入分析,而不是像定量策略那样广泛地分散投资。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 94

    浏览
相关问题