开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Pretzel · 2024年05月22日

C?

NO.PZ2024021801000019

问题如下:

Which of the following statements regarding engagement styles is most accurate?

选项:

A.Issues-based, top-down engagement fits more closely with active investment approaches B.Company-focused, bottom-up engagement fits more closely with passive investment approaches C.Active investors with focused portfolios typically seek a direct discussion with senior management as starting point for engagement

解释:

A. Incorrect because most investment houses mix the two, though company-focused, bottom-up engagement fits most naturally with active investment approaches, particularly those with concentrated portfolios, whereas issues-based, top-down engagement tends to align more closely with passive or otherwise broadly diversified investment portfolios.

B. Incorrect because most investment houses mix the two, though company-focused, bottom-up engagement fits most naturally with active investment approaches, particularly those with concentrated portfolios, whereas issues-based, top-down engagement tends to align more closely with passive or otherwise broadly diversified investment portfolios.

C. Correct because active investors, particularly those with focused portfolios, start with the company itself and its business issues and develop a tailored engagement approach cutting across a range of issues, often with the investment teams taking a leading role. Companies selected for this approach are often identified from investment underperformers or ones that trigger other financial or ESG metrics. The starting point is typically to seek a direct discussion with senior management and then the board.

讲义里说Active investment, company focused 一般会从chair/board开始dialouge

2 个答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年05月24日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


教材里对于Firms with a governance heritage和.Active investors with focused portfolios的起始点还是有些许不同的。请仔细区别,但本质都是从高层再到投资者关系团队或者可持续发展团队。


----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年05月23日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


选项C中提到的主动投资者与高级管理层的直接讨论作为参与的起点,而不是直接与董事会或董事长讨论,有以下几个原因:

管理层的可操作性

  • 高级管理层,尤其是CEO和CFO等,通常更直接地参与公司的日常运营和战略决策。他们对公司的业务情况、财务状况和运营挑战有更详细和实际的了解,可以更快地响应投资者的关切。

层级沟通的有效性

  • 与高级管理层的沟通可以为后续与董事会或董事长的讨论奠定基础。通过先与管理层进行讨论,投资者可以收集更多的具体信息,并了解管理层对某些问题的看法和解决方案,从而在与董事会沟通时更具针对性和有效性。

初步评估和反馈

  • 主动投资者通常希望在正式与董事会沟通之前,先通过与管理层的讨论来初步评估公司的情况,并获得第一手的反馈。这种方式可以帮助投资者更好地准备,并在必要时调整他们的参与策略。

关系的建立和信任的培养

  • 与管理层的直接互动有助于建立双方的信任和合作关系。管理层可能更愿意在初期阶段分享他们的观点和计划,这有助于建立一个建设性的对话环境。

逐层推进的策略

  • 逐层推进的参与策略通常更符合公司内部的决策流程。管理层可以在与董事会或董事长的讨论前,先了解投资者的关切,并在内部进行讨论和准备,这样可以使后续的讨论更加顺利和高效。

综上所述,主动投资者通常会先与高级管理层进行直接讨论,然后再与董事会或董事长沟通,这种做法有助于提高沟通的效率和效果。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

Pretzel · 2024年05月24日

教材原文“Firms with a governance heritage tend to focus first on individual companies, starting with the chair (often with the assistance of the company secretary) and working through the board and down to management from there.” 所以starting point是chair,然后board,最后是management吧?

  • 2

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 251

    浏览
相关问题