开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

139****0989 · 2024年05月21日

为什么 Formally adding a company to an exclusion list也对？

  1. ESG
  2. Engagement and stewardship

NO.PZ2024021802000047

问题如下：

Which of the following actions are considered an escalation of engagement?

• Action 1: Making a public statement in advance of general meetings

• Action 2: Formally adding a company to an exclusion list

选项：

A.Action 1 only B.Action 2 only C.Both Action 1 and Action 2

解释：

A. Incorrect because both Action 1 and Action 2 are considered as escalation of engagement. There are many ways to escalate, including making a public statement in advance of general meetings and formally adding the company to an exclusion list.

B. Incorrect because both Action 1 and Action 2 are considered as escalation of engagement. There are many ways to escalate, including making a public statement in advance of general meetings and formally adding the company to an exclusion list.

C. Correct because both Action 1 and Action 2 are considered as escalation of engagement. There are many ways to escalate, including making a public statement in advance of general meetings and formally adding the company to an exclusion list.

 Formally adding a company to an exclusion list应该一种删选法，而不是ENGAGEMENT吧？为什么这个也对？

添加评论
1 个答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年05月21日

嗨，努力学习的PZer你好：


看一下这道题在讲义的第54页。

为什么将公司列入排除名单也是参与升级的一种：

  1. 公开施加压力：将公司列入排除名单是一种非常强烈的信号，表明投资者对公司的治理或行为严重不满。通过公开宣布这一决定，投资者向市场、其他投资者和公司本身传达了强烈的批评和不信任。这种行为实际上是在公开施加压力，迫使公司进行反思和改变。
  2. 最终手段：将公司排除出投资组合通常被视为参与的最终手段之一。当其他较为温和的参与方式（如对话、投票、公开声明等）未能奏效时，投资者可能会采取排除行动，以表明其对公司行为或治理的不满。这是一种表明投资者决心的极端措施。
  3. 一部分长期的参与策略：尽管排除看似是放弃参与，但它也是参与过程的一部分。投资者可能会在进行了一系列未果的参与行动后，最终选择排除公司。这不仅是为了保护投资者的利益，也是为了向其他公司传达明确的信息，即不良行为将导致严重的财务后果。

总结：

通过将公司列入排除名单，投资者在向公司施加更大的压力，促使其改变行为。因此，它也是一种参与升级的方式。选项C是正确的，因为它正确地识别了两种行为都是参与升级的方式。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版，加油！

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 201

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024021802000047 问题如下 Whiof the following actions are consireescalation of engagement?• Action 1: Making a public statement in aanof genermeetings• Action 2: Formally aing a company to exclusion list A.Action 1 only B.Action 2 only C.Both Action 1 anAction 2 Incorrebecause both Action 1 anAction 2 are consireescalation of engagement. There are many ways to escalate, inclung making a public statement in aanof genermeetings anformally aing the company to exclusion list.Incorrebecause both Action 1 anAction 2 are consireescalation of engagement. There are many ways to escalate, inclung making a public statement in aanof genermeetings anformally aing the company to exclusion list.Correbecause both Action 1 anAction 2 are consireescalation of engagement. There are many ways to escalate, inclung making a public statement in aanof genermeetings anformally aing the company to exclusion list. 2）Formally aing the company to exclusion list. 这一条不在下方的这些里面的后4条吧？ 为什么可以作为escalation呢？While the first three actions might seen many engagement professionals part of a stanrset of tools in normalogues with companies, the last four will certainly recognizeforms of escalation: 1. holng aitionmeetings with management specifically to scuss concerns; 2. expressing concerns through the company’s aisers; 3. meeting with the chair or other boarmembers; 4. collaborating with other investors on particulissues; 5. making a public statement in aanof genermeetings; 6. submitting resolutions anspeaking genermeetings; an7. requisitioning a genermeeting an in some cases, proposing to change boarmembership.

2025-01-15 13:15 1 · 回答