开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Captain America · 2024年05月14日

请问B答案和C答案的区别C答案错在哪儿?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201604030100004305

问题如下:

Samuel Telline, CFA, is a portfolio manager at Aiklin Investments with discretionary authority over all of his accounts. One of his clients, Alan Caper, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Ellipse Manufacturing, invites Telline to lunch.

At the restaurant, the CEO reveals the reason for the lunch. "As you know Reinhold Partners has made an unsolicited cash offer for all outstanding shares of Ellipse Manufacturing. Reinhold has made it clear that I will not be CEO if they are successful. I can assure you that our shareholders will be better off in the long term if I’m in charge." Caper then shows Telline his projections for a new plan designed to boost both sales and operating margins.

"I know that your firm is the trustee for our firm’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). I hope that the trustee will vote in the best interest of our shareholders—and that would be a vote against the takeover offer."

After looking through Caper’s business plans, Telline says, "This plan looks good. I will recommend that the trustee vote against the offer."

Caper responds, "I remember my friend Karen Leighton telling me that the Leighton Family’s Trust is managed by your firm. Perhaps the trustee could vote those shares against the acquisition as well. Karen Leighton is a close friend. I am sure that she would agree."

Telline responds, "The Family Trust is no longer managed by Aiklin." He adds, "I understand that the Trust is very conservatively managed. I doubt it that it would have holdings in Ellipse Manufacturing." Telline does not mention that although the Family Trust has changed investment managers, Karen Leighton remains an important client at Aiklin with significant personal holdings in Ellipse.

After lunch, Telline meets with Sydney Brown, CFA, trustee of the Ellipse ESOP. He shows her Caper’s plan for improvements. "I think the plan is a good one and Caper is one of the firm’s most profitable accounts. We don’t want to lose him." Brown agrees to analyze the plan. After thoroughly analyzing both the plan and the takeover offer, Brown concludes that the takeover offer is best for the shareholders in the ESOP and votes the plan’s shares in favor of the takeover offer.

A few months later the acquisition of Ellipse by Reinhold Partners is completed. Caper again meets Telline for lunch. "I received a generous severance package and I’m counting on you to manage my money well for me. While we are on the subject, I would like to be more aggressive with my portfolio. With my severance package, I can take additional risk." Telline and Caper discuss his current financial situation, risk tolerance, and financial objectives throughout lunch. Telline agrees to adjust Caper’s investment policy statement (IPS) to reflect his greater appetite for risk and his increased wealth.

Back at the office, Telline realizes that with the severance package, Caper is now his wealthiest client. He also realizes that Caper’s increased appetite for risk gives him a risk profile similar to that of another client. He pulls a copy of the other client’s investment policy statement (IPS) and reviews it quickly before realizing that the two clients have very different tax situations. Telline quickly revises Caper’s IPS to reflect the changes in his financial situation. He uses the other client’s IPS as a reference when revising the section relating to Caper’s risk tolerance. He then files the revised IPS in Caper’s file.

The following week, an Aiklin analyst issues a buy recommendation on a small technology company with a promising software product. Telline reads the report carefully and concludes it would be suitable under Caper’s new IPS. Telline places an order for 10,000 shares in Caper’s account and then calls Caper to discuss the stock in more detail. Telline does not purchase the stock for any other clients. Although the one client has the same risk profile as Caper, that client does not have cash available in his account and Telline determines that selling existing holdings does not make sense.

In a subsequent telephone conversation, Caper expresses his lingering anger over the takeover. "You didn’t do enough to persuade Aiklin’s clients to vote against the takeover. Maybe I should look for an investment manager who is more loyal." Telline tries to calm Caper but is unsuccessful. In an attempt to change the topic of conversation, Telline states, "The firm was just notified of our allocation of a long-awaited IPO. Your account should receive a significant allocation. I would hate to see you lose out by moving your account." Caper seems mollified and concludes the phone call, "I look forward to a long-term relationship with you and your firm."

Aiklin distributes a copy of its firm policies regarding IPO allocations to all clients annually. According to the policy, Aiklin allocates IPO shares to each investment manager and each manager has responsibility for allocating shares to accounts for which the IPO is suitable. The statement also discloses that Aiklin offers different levels of service for different fees.

After carefully reviewing the proposed IPO and his client accounts, Telline determines that the IPO is suitable for 11 clients including Caper. Because the deal is oversubscribed, he receives only half of the shares he expected. Telline directs 50% of his allocation to Caper’s account and divides the remaining 50% between the other ten accounts, each with a value equal to half of Caper’s account.


5. Is Aiklin’s policy with respect to IPO allocations consistent with required and recommended CFA Institute Standards?

选项:

A.

Yes.

B.

No, because the IPO policy disadvantages certain clients.

C.

No, because the different levels of service disadvantage certain clients.

解释:

B is correct.

The firm violates Standard III(B) –Fair Dealing. Under Aiklin’s policy, some clients for whom an IPO is suitable may not receive their pro-rata share of the issue. CFA Standards recommend that firms allocate IPOs on a pro-rata basis to clients, not to portfolio managers.

请问B答案和C答案的区别C答案错在哪儿?

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2024年05月14日

选项B指出的问题是Aiklin公司的IPO分配政策可能会导致某些客户处于不利地位。具体来说,根据Aiklin的IPO分配政策,IPO股份是分配给每个投资经理的,然后由每个经理负责将股份分配给适合该IPO的账户。这种做法可能会导致即使IPO适合某些客户,他们也可能因为经理的分配决策而无法获得他们按比例应得的份额,从而违反了CFA协会标准的公平交易原则。

选项C则关注Aiklin提供不同级别的服务,并据此收取不同的费用,认为这可能会使某些客户处于不利地位。然而,提供不同级别的服务并不一定违反CFA标准,只要这些服务级别是透明地提供,并且客户清楚地了解他们正在支付的费用以及与之相对应的服务内容。问题的关键在于是否所有客户都被公平对待,并且是否获得了他们支付费用所对应的价值。

C答案的错误在于它没有直接指出IPO分配政策本身的问题,而是指向了服务级别的差异。而根据案例描述,并没有提及服务级别的差异导致了不公平的对待或损害了客户的利益。因此,C答案没有准确地指出违反CFA标准的具体行为,而B答案则直接关联到了IPO分配政策可能导致的不公平性问题,所以B答案是正确的。

综上所述,虽然Aiklin提供不同级别的服务可能是一个值得关注的点,但在这个特定案例中,关键问题在于IPO的分配方式,因此选项B更为准确地指出了问题的核心。