开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Shuangshuang · 2024年05月07日

麻烦讲解一下B

NO.PZ2023102101000065

问题如下:

In a surprise monetary policy action on August 10, 2015, the People’s Bank of China cut its daily currency reference rate against the USD, resulting in a large devaluation of the CNY versus the USD. Immediately after the announcement, the CRO of CMM Bank (CMM), an international bank with headquarters in Shanghai, began evaluating the impact of this and other events on the bank’s position.

CMM had outstanding long-term debt denominated in USD and deposits denominated in CNY. A significant portion of CMM’s lending portfolio was also denominated in CNY and consisted largely of loans and lines of credit to Chinese manufacturers who were heavily dependent on imported raw materials. Other loans to non-Chinese firms with exposure to China were denominated in USD. The bank’s portfolio investments included CNY denominated Chinese Treasury securities and other sovereign debt.

A portion of CMM’s retail customer base had invested on margin in the Chinese equity markets. Over the next few weeks, local stock markets experienced declines in share prices. Many of CMM’s larger retail depositors experienced margin calls and had begun to draw down demand deposits to meet them. Offsetting these outflows, however, were increases in the 3-month, 6-month and 9-month term deposit balances at CMM of several large corporate customers. The result was that CMM’s overall net deposit flow had been approximately zero.

As a result of credit developments elsewhere in the world, several of CMM’s sovereign debt holdings were downgraded, some from AA to A and some from A to BBB. One of the noticeable outcomes was that the bid-ask spreads on many of the sovereign bonds held and traded by CMM widened. Despite these developments, CMM’s sovereign debt portfolio remained exclusively investment grade with a weighted average rating of A+.

CMM’s CRO was concerned about the bank’s liquidity position and decided to review the impact of the devaluation and other capital market events on its net stable funding ratio (NSFR). Ignoring any changes in the market value of CMM’s sovereign debt holdings, which of the following is correct?

选项:

A.

The NSFR will not be impacted by the sovereign credit rating changes because the overall sovereign debt portfolio remains investment grade

B.

The NSFR will be reduced by the sovereign credit rating changes but this effect can be offset by selling A-rated sovereign debt and investing the proceeds in gold

C.

The NSFR will not be impacted by the change in demand deposits because the bank’s overall deposit level is unchanged

D.

The NSFR will be reduced by the change in demand deposits but this effect can be offset by issuing common stock

解释:

The shift in the demand deposit base from retail demand deposits to wholesale demand deposits with terms less than one year would reduce the NSFR. The change in retail deposit behavior would likely cause a shifting of demand deposit classification from “stable” to “less stable” also reducing the NSFR. The downward sovereign credit migration would increase the RSF applied to these bonds and reduce the NSFR. The issuance of common stock, which should be classified as Tier 1 capital, would increase the NSFR.

麻烦讲解一下B

1 个答案
已采纳答案

pzqa39 · 2024年05月08日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


NSFR会因主权信用评级变化而降低,但通过卖出A级主权债务并将所得款项投资于黄金可以抵消这种影响


这个说法并不完全准确。净稳定资金比率(NSFR)衡量的是银行可用的稳定资金与所需的稳定资金之间的比例,用以评估银行长期的流动性状况。主权信用评级下降可能会影响银行持有这些债券所需的稳定资金量,因为评级较低的资产可能需要更多稳定资金来支持。然而,简单地通过卖出A级主权债务并转投黄金并不能直接提高NSFR,因为黄金虽然通常被视为避险资产,但在NSFR计算中可能不会像主权债务那样被视作优质流动资产,而且这样的操作可能会引入其他风险(如市场风险、机会成本等),且不直接影响到稳定资金的结构。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 145

    浏览
相关问题