开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

刘杨 · 2024年04月26日

a为什么不对

NO.PZ2023032701000070

问题如下:

In late 2010, Amersheen announced a significant restructuring charge, estimated at R2 million, that would be reported as part of operating earnings in Amersheen’s 2010 annual income statement.

What was the correct way to treat the estimated R2 million restructuring charge in 2010 valuation report?

选项:

A.

an upward adjustment to book value

B.

an upward adjustment to the cost of equity

C.

to exclude it from the estimate of net income.

解释:

The restructuring charge is a nonrecurring item and not indicative of future earnings. In applying a residual income model, it is important to develop a forecast of future residual income based upon recurring items. Using the net income reported in Amersheen’s 2010 net income statement to model subsequent future earnings, without adjustment for the restructuring charge, would understate the firm’s future earnings. By upward adjusting the firm’s net income, by adding back the R2 million restructuring charge to reflect the fact that the charge is nonrecurring, future earnings will be more accurately forecasted.

a为什么不对,利润调高了,留存收益不也应该相应调高吗?

1 个答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2024年04月26日

同学你好,不对的哦

重组费用这些一次性费用,分析师只会在计算公司NI和EPS的时候予以加回,对于B/S表的Equity项目,是不需要调整的

一是因为B/S表一般投资者根本不看,所以不太需要调整

二是因为重组费用对公司Equity的影响是要持续很多年的,他是确确实实的减少了留存收益从而持续的减少Equity的期末值,这个期末值的减少会在会导致未来很多年Equity的值都变小了一截。而对利润的影响才是一次性的。因为一旦明年没有重组费用了,NI就是应该变高的。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 109

    浏览
相关问题