开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

大涵 · 2024年04月16日

什么时候直接对话有效,什么时候collective有效?

NO.PZ2022120703000054

问题如下:

A non-profit organization published a report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impact the valuation of a portfolio company. According to the Investor Forum, which of the following forms of engagement would be the most effective?

选项:

A.Discussing the report with the company during their annual review dialogue

B.Writing a tailored letter to the company requesting additional details about their plastic footprint

C.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to address the report

解释:

Compare to other two ways, collective engagement is the most effective way.

C is correct because a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement published by the Investor Forum i.e.

"SF1 – Objective(s) should be specific and targeted to enable clarity around delivery",

"SF2 – Objectives should be strategic or governance-led, or linked to material strategic and/or governance issues",

"SF3 – The engagement approach should be bespoke (tailored) to the target company",

"SF4 – The participants should have clear leadership with appropriate relationships, skills and knowledge",

"SF5 – The scale of coalition gathered (both scale of shareholding and overall AUM of group) should be meaningful",

"SF6 – The coalition should have a prior relationship and/or cultural awareness of the target company."

A is incorrect because the manager's engagement is an example of a "housekeeping engagement" which is an "annual dialogue to help maintain and enhance a relationship with a company, but with only limited objectives." Housekeeping engagement is somewhat likely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of "SF6: Depth of relationship" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.

B is incorrect because tailored letter-writing is somewhat likely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of "SF1: Clear Objective" and "SF2: Material and strategic" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.

分不太清这两种,直接对话和集体

2 个答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年04月25日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


可以看一下第五版教材的第382页-385页。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年04月16日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


在决定何时使用直接对话(比如年度审查对话)和何时使用集体行动(与其他投资者合作集体参与)来与公司进行沟通时,需要考虑几个关键因素。这些因素可以帮助你判断哪种方式更有效,这通常依赖于你的目标、公司的特性、问题的性质,以及你持有的影响力或资源。

直接对话的有效场景

  1. 特定问题或紧急事项:如果问题非常具体或需要迅速解决,直接对话可以快速直接地传达你的关切或询问。
  2. 已建立的关系:如果投资者与公司之间已有良好的沟通基础和深入的关系,直接对话可能更为有效,因为双方已经建立了信任。
  3. 非广泛影响的问题:对于那些主要影响单一公司而不是整个行业或市场的问题,直接对话可能是更合适的策略。

集体行动的有效场景

  1. 涉及广泛影响或系统性问题:当问题影响整个行业或需要更广泛的市场变化时,集体行动可以展现更大的影响力和紧迫性。
  2. 资源共享和风险分摊:集体行动允许参与者共享资源、信息和策略,同时也能分摊行动可能带来的风险。
  3. 增强说服力:当多个投资者共同表达关切时,公司更可能认真对待这些问题,因为它们代表了更广泛的市场观点和资本影响。
  4. 解决复杂或根深蒂固的问题:对于那些需要重大变革的问题,集体行动可以更有效地推动公司进行结构性或战略性调整。

综上所述,选择直接对话还是集体行动取决于问题的性质、你的目标、与公司的关系以及所需的影响力。例如,如果问题比较具体,与你的投资直接相关,并且你已经与公司有了建立良好的沟通渠道,直接对话可能更为合适。相反,如果面对的是行业广泛的问题,或者需要更强的市场压力来推动改变,集体行动则可能更加有效。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

长槲 · 2024年04月25日

依据在哪

  • 2

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 325

    浏览
相关问题

知识点对应错误 B也对,

2024-07-29 09:45 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000054问题如下 A non-profit organization publishea report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impathe valuation of a portfolio company. Accorng to the Investor Forum, whiof the following forms of engagement woulthe most effective? A.scussing the report with the company ring their annureview alogueB.Writing a tailoreletter to the company requesting aitiontails about their plastic footprintC.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to aress the report Compare to other two ways, collective engagement is the most effective way.C is correbecause a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement publishethe Investor Forum i.e. \"SF1 – Objective(s) shoulspecific antargeteto enable clarity arounlivery\", \"SF2 – Objectives shoulstrategic or governance-le or linketo materistrategic anor governanissues\", \"SF3 – The engagement approashoulbespoke (tailore to the target company\", \"SF4 – The participants shoulhave clelearship with appropriate relationships, skills anknowlee\", \"SF5 – The scale of coalition gathere(both scale of shareholng anoverall AUM of group) shoulmeaningful\", \"SF6 – The coalition shoulhave a prior relationship anor culturawareness of the target company.\"A is incorrebecause the manager's engagement is example of a \"housekeeping engagement\" whiis \"annualogue to help maintain anenhana relationship with a company, but with only limiteobjectives.\" Housekeeping engagement is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of \"SF6: pth of relationship\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.B is incorrebecause tailoreletter-writing is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of \"SF1: CleObjective\" an\"SF2: Materianstrategic\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement. 为什么不选b呀。。。。

2024-05-19 19:33 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000054 问题如下 A non-profit organization publishea report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impathe valuation of a portfolio company. Accorng to the Investor Forum, whiof the following forms of engagement woulthe most effective? A.scussing the report with the company ring their annureview alogue B.Writing a tailoreletter to the company requesting aitiontails about their plastic footprint C.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to aress the report Compare to other two ways, collective engagement is the most effective way.C is correbecause a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement publishethe Investor Forum i.e. \"SF1 – Objective(s) shoulspecific antargeteto enable clarity arounlivery\", \"SF2 – Objectives shoulstrategic or governance-le or linketo materistrategic anor governanissues\", \"SF3 – The engagement approashoulbespoke (tailore to the target company\", \"SF4 – The participants shoulhave clelearship with appropriate relationships, skills anknowlee\", \"SF5 – The scale of coalition gathere(both scale of shareholng anoverall AUM of group) shoulmeaningful\", \"SF6 – The coalition shoulhave a prior relationship anor culturawareness of the target company.\"A is incorrebecause the manager's engagement is example of a \"housekeeping engagement\" whiis \"annualogue to help maintain anenhana relationship with a company, but with only limiteobjectives.\" Housekeeping engagement is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of \"SF6: pth of relationship\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.B is incorrebecause tailoreletter-writing is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of \"SF1: CleObjective\" an\"SF2: Materianstrategic\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement. 联合其他投资人,一起做engagement不会被认为是一致行动人吗?

2024-04-17 17:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000054问题如下 A non-profit organization publishea report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impathe valuation of a portfolio company. Accorng to the Investor Forum, whiof the following forms of engagement woulthe most effective? A.scussing the report with the company ring their annureview alogueB.Writing a tailoreletter to the company requesting aitiontails about their plastic footprintC.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to aress the report Compare to other two ways, collective engagement is the most effective way.C is correbecause a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement publishethe Investor Forum i.e. \"SF1 – Objective(s) shoulspecific antargeteto enable clarity arounlivery\", \"SF2 – Objectives shoulstrategic or governance-le or linketo materistrategic anor governanissues\", \"SF3 – The engagement approashoulbespoke (tailore to the target company\", \"SF4 – The participants shoulhave clelearship with appropriate relationships, skills anknowlee\", \"SF5 – The scale of coalition gathere(both scale of shareholng anoverall AUM of group) shoulmeaningful\", \"SF6 – The coalition shoulhave a prior relationship anor culturawareness of the target company.\"A is incorrebecause the manager's engagement is example of a \"housekeeping engagement\" whiis \"annualogue to help maintain anenhana relationship with a company, but with only limiteobjectives.\" Housekeeping engagement is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of \"SF6: pth of relationship\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.B is incorrebecause tailoreletter-writing is somewhlikely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of \"SF1: CleObjective\" an\"SF2: Materianstrategic\" but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement. 如题。a,b为啥不行

2023-12-13 19:30 5 · 回答