开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

csnow321 · 2024年04月03日

关于diversify

NO.PZ2022062601000018

问题如下:

Finance students John and Jesse discuss Multi-Manager Strategies, discussing the differences between multi-strategy and fund-of-funds approaches. Jesse said that multi-strategy funds are generally better than fund-of-funds. She gave the following reasons:

• lower levels of variance,

• lower levels of leverage,

• improved fee structure,

• increased transparency,

• faster reaction time, and

• a more diverse mix of investment strategies.

Jessie's comment is likely accurate:

选项:



A.

variance and leverage.

B.

fee structure and transparency.

C.

reaction time and diversification.

解释:

B is correct. Multi-strategy funds typically have more favorable fee structures for investors than funds of funds and also offer increased transparency.

A is incorrect. Multi-strategy funds typically use more leverage and have more unstable returns than FOFs.

C is incorrect. Although multi-strategy funds have faster reaction times for tactical allocation changes, funds of funds potentially offer a more diverse mix of strategies.

知识点考察:Multi-Manager Strategies

B 是正确的。Multi-strategy funds通常比FOFs对投资者有更有利的费用结构,并且还提供更高的透明度。

A 不正确。Multi-strategy funds通常比基金中的基金使用更多的杠杆。

C 不正确。尽管Multi-strategy fundsreaction time更快,但FOFsdiversification


请问C选项中,为什么FOF比multi更diversify?感觉两个应该是同等diversify?

1 个答案

伯恩_品职助教 · 2024年04月03日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


因为multi是同一个公司管理,会有架构或者方向上一致性。而FOF投资不同公司的产品,不同公司大概率天然的投资逻辑不同

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 214

    浏览
相关问题