开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

qyang · 2024年03月10日

hedging strategy

In 2015, Testa informed Fournier that he had taken large positions in both a New Zealand firm and an Australian packaging firm. The positions were roughly equal in size in terms of the US dollar. Fournier informed Testa that the correlation between USD/AUD and USD/NZD was approximately 0.85. Given the size of the positions, Testa indicated that he wished to minimize any foreign exchange exposure.

Question

The most appropriate hedging strategy for the 2015 positions, in keeping with Testa’s wishes, is based on a:

  1. direct hedge on each currency separately.
  2. cross-hedge of the two currencies in the portfolio.
  3. minimum-variance hedge of the two currencies in the portfolio.



The high correlation between the currencies could have been exploited with a cross-hedge or a minimum-variance hedge if one of the foreign assets was held long and the other short.


请问解答中的这句话怎么理解?为什么澳元和新元持有一个做多一个做空的时候,更适合用cross hedge或mvhr?可以讲解一下并举例吗?我看到前面有同学问过,但是解答只是把答案翻译了一遍,希望老师能解释一下而不是翻译。谢谢!!

1 个答案
已采纳答案

pzqa31 · 2024年03月10日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


不是说Long+short更适合,注意下这句话里说的“could have been exploied”,这里的意思是,如果两种货币相关性很高,Long一种货币的同时short另一种货币,就相当于天然存在对冲,但是这道题说的是两种货币都是Long头寸,所以并不存在这句话描述的天然对冲的情况,这个时候只能分别对这两种货币进行对冲。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 212

    浏览
相关问题