开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

Captain America · 2024年03月08日

请解释A选项的conservative？

  1. CFA II
  2. FRA

NO.PZ2020021601000019

问题如下：

Judith Yoo is a financial sector analyst writing an industry report.

Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a global commercial bank, and its CAMELS rating, risk management practices, and performance.

To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the loan loss analysis in Exhibit 4.

Based on Exhibit 4, a loan loss analysis for the last three years indicates that:

选项：

A.

Company XYZ has become less conservative in its provisioning for consumer loans.

B.

the provision for commercial loan losses has trailed the actual net charge- off experience.

C.

the cushion between the allowance and the net commercial loan charge- offs has declined.

解释：

C is correct.

The allowance for loan losses to net commercial loan charge- offs has been declining during the last three years, which indicates that the cushion between the allowance and the net commercial loan charge- offs has deteriorated.

2015 Consumer: Allowance for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=13,000/2,901=4.48

2016 Consumer: Allowance for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=11,500/2,505=4.59

2017 Consumer: Allowance for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=11,000/2,460=4.47

2015 Commercial: Allowance for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=169/44=3.84

2016 Commercial: Allowance for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=1,012/387=2.61

2017 Commercial: Allowance for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=1,540/1,060=1.45

2015 Consumer: Provision for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=1,300/2,901=0.45

2016 Consumer: Provision for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=2,000/2,505=0.80

2017 Consumer: Provision for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=3,000/2,460=1.22

2015 Commercial: Provision for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=95/44=2.16

2016 Commercial: Provision for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=442/387=1.14

2017 Commercial: Provision for Loan Losses/Net Loan Charge-Offs=1,100/1,060=1.04

请解释A选项的conservative？

添加评论
1 个答案
已采纳答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2024年03月08日

同学你好，conservative就是更保守的意思。

请看以下讲义截图绿色画圈部分，结合下面题目解析这里计算的指标，可以看到公司确实每年该ratio在上升，说明确实公司是更保守了而非不保守，所以A是错误的

会计上的保守，是指高估费用低估收入，从而避免自己的NI过高

provision可以认为是每年计提的坏账准备，而net charge off是每年实际的坏账。坏账计提占比实际坏账的比列越来越高，说明公司计提坏账的程度在增加，公司确认费用确认的越来越多了，这就是典型的多确认费用。

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 495

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2020021601000019 问题如下 Juth Yoo is a financisector analyst writing instry report. Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a globcommercibank, anits CAMELS rating, risk management practices, anperformance. To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the loloss analysis in Exhibit 4.Baseon Exhibit 4, a loloss analysis for the last three years incates that: A.Company XYZ hbecome less conservative in its provisioning for consumer loans. B.the provision for commercilolosses htrailethe actunet charge- off experience. C.the cushion between the allowananthe net commercilocharge- offs hcline C is correct.The allowanfor lolosses to net commercilocharge- offs hbeen clining ring the last three years, whiincates ththe cushion between the allowananthe net commercilocharge- offs hteriorate2015 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=13,000/2,901=4.482016 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=11,500/2,505=4.592017 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=11,000/2,460=4.472015 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=169/44=3.842016 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,012/387=2.612017 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,540/1,060=1.452015 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,300/2,901=0.452016 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=2,000/2,505=0.802017 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=3,000/2,460=1.222015 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=95/44=2.162016 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=442/387=1.142017 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,100/1,060=1.04 如题

2024-05-23 15:08 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020021601000019 问题如下 Juth Yoo is a financisector analyst writing instry report. Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a globcommercibank, anits CAMELS rating, risk management practices, anperformance. To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the loloss analysis in Exhibit 4.Baseon Exhibit 4, a loloss analysis for the last three years incates that: A.Company XYZ hbecome less conservative in its provisioning for consumer loans. B.the provision for commercilolosses htrailethe actunet charge- off experience. C.the cushion between the allowananthe net commercilocharge- offs hcline C is correct.The allowanfor lolosses to net commercilocharge- offs hbeen clining ring the last three years, whiincates ththe cushion between the allowananthe net commercilocharge- offs hteriorate2015 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=13,000/2,901=4.482016 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=11,500/2,505=4.592017 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=11,000/2,460=4.472015 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=169/44=3.842016 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,012/387=2.612017 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,540/1,060=1.452015 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,300/2,901=0.452016 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=2,000/2,505=0.802017 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=3,000/2,460=1.222015 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=95/44=2.162016 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=442/387=1.142017 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,100/1,060=1.04 能否只考虑commercial的情况？

2024-04-23 10:01 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020021601000019 问题如下 Juth Yoo is a financisector analyst writing instry report. Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a globcommercibank, anits CAMELS rating, risk management practices, anperformance. To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the loloss analysis in Exhibit 4.Baseon Exhibit 4, a loloss analysis for the last three years incates that: A.Company XYZ hbecome less conservative in its provisioning for consumer loans. B.the provision for commercilolosses htrailethe actunet charge- off experience. C.the cushion between the allowananthe net commercilocharge- offs hcline C is correct.The allowanfor lolosses to net commercilocharge- offs hbeen clining ring the last three years, whiincates ththe cushion between the allowananthe net commercilocharge- offs hteriorate2015 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=13,000/2,901=4.482016 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=11,500/2,505=4.592017 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=11,000/2,460=4.472015 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=169/44=3.842016 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,012/387=2.612017 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,540/1,060=1.452015 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,300/2,901=0.452016 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=2,000/2,505=0.802017 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=3,000/2,460=1.222015 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=95/44=2.162016 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=442/387=1.142017 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,100/1,060=1.04 A中说的ratio我看前两年都是小于1的，后面在慢慢大于1，虽然说是不断增加的（这个是好事），但是前两年总归是小于1的呀，说明的就是公司计提的损失准备小于了真实的坏账发生额，是不好的一件事情，所以就不应该是conservative呀？还是说只要趋势是增加的就说明是conservative的？不论大于1还是小于1？

2024-03-18 11:22 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2020021601000019 问题如下 Juth Yoo is a financisector analyst writing instry report. Part of Yoo’s analysis focuses on Company XYZ, a globcommercibank, anits CAMELS rating, risk management practices, anperformance. To assess Company XYZ’s risk management practices, Yoo reviews the loloss analysis in Exhibit 4.Baseon Exhibit 4, a loloss analysis for the last three years incates that: A.Company XYZ hbecome less conservative in its provisioning for consumer loans. B.the provision for commercilolosses htrailethe actunet charge- off experience. C.the cushion between the allowananthe net commercilocharge- offs hcline C is correct.The allowanfor lolosses to net commercilocharge- offs hbeen clining ring the last three years, whiincates ththe cushion between the allowananthe net commercilocharge- offs hteriorate2015 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=13,000/2,901=4.482016 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=11,500/2,505=4.592017 Consumer: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=11,000/2,460=4.472015 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=169/44=3.842016 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,012/387=2.612017 Commercial: Allowanfor LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,540/1,060=1.452015 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,300/2,901=0.452016 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=2,000/2,505=0.802017 Consumer: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=3,000/2,460=1.222015 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=95/44=2.162016 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=442/387=1.142017 Commercial: Provision for LoLosses/Net LoCharge-Offs=1,100/1,060=1.04 如题

2024-03-01 23:15 1 · 回答