NO.PZ202207040100001005
问题如下:
The most cost efficient strategy to deal with Dashe’s concerns following the equity market correction is a(n):选项:
A.rebalancing to policy weights by selling bonds and purchasing equities. B.rebalancing by replacing the highest-tracking-error manager with low-cost index exchange-traded funds (ETFs). C.overlay using equity index futures.解释:
SolutionC is correct. The most cost efficient rebalancing strategy is to implement an overlay using equity index futures. This approach can get the equity exposure up to at least the guideline range without impacting the active managers. Equity index futures will very likely have less tracking error than the active managers.
A is incorrect. Buying equities and selling bonds will incur trading costs and disrupt the present active managers’ execution. This is not the most cost-effective solution compared with a derivatives overlay.
B is incorrect. The IPS does not allow for index ETFs; it allows for only active managers and derivatives.
客户明确说了,要用factor - based,并认为factor - based比market cap-weighted index更好。
因此,不适合投资指数ETF(index exchange-traded funds )
这里factor - based比market cap-weighted index,和ETF的对应关系,在哪里有对照?