开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

506623496 · 2023年12月18日

答案的解释和B选项statement 2没关系吧?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201812020100000405

问题如下:

Which of Molly’s statements about liability-driven investing is (are) correct?

选项:

A.

Statement 1 only

B.

Statement 2 only.

C.

Both Statement 1 and Statement 2.

解释:

C is correct. Molly is correct that measurement error can arise even in immunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, which have set amounts and set dates. Also, a parallel shift in yield curves is a sufficient but not a necessary condition to achieve the desired outcome. Non-parallel shifts as well as twists in the yield curve can change the cash flow yield on the immunizing portfolio; however, minimizing the dispersion of cash flows in the asset portfolio mitigates this risk. As a result, both statements are correct.

答案没有解释cash flow matching 的问题?

1 个答案

pzqa31 · 2023年12月18日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


利率的改变不会影响到Cash flow matching的匹配效果。


Cash flow matching的原理就是:

我们先分析负债现金流发生的日期与金额,这是我们需要满足的现金流流出。然后我们购买合适的债券组合,经过计算与设计,让债券的Coupon与本金现金流流入正正好等于负债的现金流流出,且Coupon以及本金现金流的发生日期也正正好等于负债现金流发生的日期。就是设计好资产现金流,让资产现金流严丝合缝地与负债现金流对上。


注意到,收到债券Coupon与本金的日期正正好是负债的到期日,所以Coupon现金流就发生在负债到期时,这样就不存在Coupon reinvestment risk。这样无论利率如何改变,都不影响Coupon现金流归还负债。

同时,又由于归还负债现金流还包含债券本金的自然到期,这是债券的自然到期,债券到期拿到的一定是本金面值,不存在Price risk。所以无论利率如何改变,也都不会影响本金现金流。


于是,设计好的Coupon现金流与本金现金流,都不受利率改变的影响,归还的金额也是我们提前计算好的,这样归还负债的现金流也就不受利率的影响了。这就导致Cash flow matching这种方法,可以消除利率的影响。


这就是statement2的结论:利率改变(Parallel shift也好,Non-parallel shift也好,都无所谓),都不影响Cash flow matching来偿还负债。


和Cash flow matching相对应的是Duration-matching。Duration-matching我们不管负债的现金流,我们匹配的原理是保证资产的收益不受利率的影响。

如何保证债券资产的收益不受利率的影响呢?

实际上是让利率改变时,债券的Coupon reinvestment risk与债券价格的Price risk相互抵消,即,利率改变对债券收益的影响途径就是Coupon reinvestment risk与Price risk,现在这两个风险抵消掉了,那么就意味着,利率改变不会影响到债券的投资收益,那么债券可以实现预期的增值,负债到期时,资产可以顺利实现增值偿还负债。

但要让Coupon reinvestment risk与Price risk相互抵消有一个前提,就是:只有利率的平行移动才能一定保证price risk与Coupon reinvestment risk完全抵消。

当发生非平行移动时,两个风险有可能会出现无法抵消的情况,如果这两个风险无法抵消,就会导致Duration-matching失效。

所以发生non-parallel shift时,Duration-matching相比就没那么保险了,于是Cash flow matching有更好的immunization效果。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 247

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201812020100000405问题如下 Whiof Molly’s statements about liability-iven investing is (are)correct? Statement 1 only Statement 2 only.Both Statement 1 and Statement 2. Cis correct. Molly is correthmeasurement error carise even inimmunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, whihave set amounts ansettes. Also, a parallel shift in yielcurves is a sufficient but not anecessary contion to achieve the sireoutcome. Non-parallel shifts welltwists in the yielcurve cchange the cash flow yielon the immunizingportfolio; however, minimizing the spersion of cash flows in the assetportfolio mitigates this risk. a result, both statements are correct. 老师 ration matching不假设收益率曲线不发生改变吗

2023-11-25 08:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201812020100000405问题如下 Whiof Molly’s statements about liability-iven investing is (are)correct? Statement 1 only Statement 2 only.Both Statement 1 and Statement 2. Cis correct. Molly is correthmeasurement error carise even inimmunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, whihave set amounts ansettes. Also, a parallel shift in yielcurves is a sufficient but not anecessary contion to achieve the sireoutcome. Non-parallel shifts welltwists in the yielcurve cchange the cash flow yielon the immunizingportfolio; however, minimizing the spersion of cash flows in the assetportfolio mitigates this risk. a result, both statements are correct. statement 1 是对的,是因为他说了一种场景吧,比如说用ration matching,parameters就有影响,cashflow没有影响。如果改成will aersely affethe bonportfolios 还对么?

2023-08-06 12:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201812020100000405 问题如下 SRCapit(SR), a globasset management company, specializes in ­fixeincomeinvestments. Molly, chief investment officer, is meeting with a prospectiveclient, Leof Puy FinanciCompany (C). Leahinforms Molly thC’s previous ­fixeincome manager focuseon the interestrate sensitivities of assets anliabilities when making asset allocationcisions. Molly explains that, in contrast, SR’s investment process ­firstanalyzes the size antiming of client liabilities, anthen it buil assetportfolio baseon the interest rate sensitivity of those liabilities. Mollynotes thSR generally uses actively manageportfolios signeto earna return in excess of the benchmark portfolio. For clients interesteinpassive exposure to ­fixeincome instruments, SR offers two aitionalapproaches.Approa1: Seeks to fully replicate a small range of benchmarks consisting of government bon.Approa2: Follows enhanceinxing process for a subset of the bon incluin the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate BonInx. Approa2 malso customizeto refleclient preferences.Toillustrate SR’s immunization approafor controlling portfolio interestrate risk, Molly scusses a hypotheticportfolio composeof two non-callable,investment-gra bon. The portfolio ha weighteaverage yiel to-maturityof 9.55%, a weighteaverage coupon rate of 10.25%, ana cash flow yielof9.85%.Leahinforms Molly thC ha single $500 million liability e in nineyears, anshe wants SR to construa bonportfolio thearns a rateof return sufficient to poff the obligation. Leexpresses concern aboutthe risks associatewith immunization strategy for this obligation. Inresponse, Molly makes the following statements about liability-iveninvesting:Statement 1: Although the amount ante of SR’s liability is known with certainty, measurement errors associatewith key parameters relative to interest rate changes maersely affethe bonportfolios.Statement 2: A cash flow matching strategy will mitigate the risk from non-parallel shifts in the yielcurve.Mollyprovis the four US llar–nominatebonportfolios in Exhibit 1 forconsiration. Molly explains ththe portfolios consist of non-callable,investment-gra corporate angovernment bon of various maturities becausezero-coupon bon are unavailable.The scussion turns to benchmarkselection. C’s previous fixeincome manager usea custom benchmark with thefollowing characteristics:Characteristic 1: The benchmark portfolio invests only in investment-gra bon of US corporations with a minimum issuansize of $250 million.Characteristic 2: Valuation occurs on a weekly basis, because many of the bon in the inx are valueweekly.Characteristic 3: Historicprices anportfolio turnover are available for review.Mollyexplains that, in orr to evaluate the asset allocation process, fixeincomeportfolios shoulhave appropriate benchmark. Leasks for benchmark aiceregarng C’s portfolio of short-term anintermeate-term bon, allnominatein US llars. Molly presents three possible benchmarks inExhibit 2. Whiof Molly’s statements about liability-iven investing is (are)correct? Statement 1 only Statement 2 only. Both Statement 1 and Statement 2. Cis correct. Molly is correthmeasurement error carise even inimmunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, whihave set amounts ansettes. Also, a parallel shift in yielcurves is a sufficient but not anecessary contion to achieve the sireoutcome. Non-parallel shifts welltwists in the yielcurve cchange the cash flow yielon the immunizingportfolio; however, minimizing the spersion of cash flows in the assetportfolio mitigates this risk. a result, both statements are correct. statement 1 中的 measurement errors指的是什么呢

2022-10-26 16:47 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201812020100000405 问题如下 Whiof Molly’s statements about liability-iven investing is (are)correct? Statement 1 only Statement 2 only. Both Statement 1 and Statement 2. Cis correct. Molly is correthmeasurement error carise even inimmunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, whihave set amounts ansettes. Also, a parallel shift in yielcurves is a sufficient but not anecessary contion to achieve the sireoutcome. Non-parallel shifts welltwists in the yielcurve cchange the cash flow yielon the immunizingportfolio; however, minimizing the spersion of cash flows in the assetportfolio mitigates this risk. a result, both statements are correct. 老师,前面一个题目不是说免疫策略是liability-asset management,不是liability-iven investing?为啥这个题干里说的是liability-asset management

2022-08-21 18:45 2 · 回答