开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Darkblanca · 2023年12月16日

Shaw’s comment about a small-cap tilt is correct. Additional exp

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202207040100000406

问题如下:

Which of Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Fund in Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning:

选项:

A.

alpha.

B.

small-cap tilt.

C.

value being out of favor.

解释:

B is correct. Shaw’s comment about a small-cap tilt is correct. Additional exposure to smaller firms resulted in a positive performance of 0.02% for the Size factor.

A is incorrect. Alpha is defined here to include performance unexplained by the factors and matches that of the benchmark.

C is incorrect. Although the value style does appear to be out of favor as shown by the lower return than that of the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor has a positive contribution to the return (0.08%).

表格里的Index后面明明加着一个benchmark凭什么就说它不是benchmark啊?

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2023年12月18日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


Hello,亲爱的同学~

只有market在各个因子上,是保持中性的。

因此我们说的small-cap tilt,是指与中性的情况,也就是market进行比较。


这里的benchmark只是为了说明:Russell 1000 value 是一个style index。


----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 296

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202207040100000406 问题如下 Whiof Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Funin Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning: A.alph B.small-ctilt. C.value being out of favor. B is correct. Shaw’s comment about a small-ctilt is correct. Aitionexposure to smaller firms resultein a positive performanof 0.02% for the Size factor.A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%). 不是portfolio-benchmark=0.03吗?那是啥?请详解

2024-08-14 22:23 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202207040100000406问题如下 Whiof Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Funin Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning: A.alpha.B.small-ctilt.C.value being out of favor. B is correct. Shaw’s comment about a small-ctilt is correct. Aitionexposure to smaller firms resultein a positive performanof 0.02% for the Size factor.A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%). 如问,请老师,谢谢🙏

2024-07-03 07:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202207040100000406 问题如下 Whiof Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Funin Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning: A.alph B.small-ctilt. C.value being out of favor. B is correct. Shaw’s comment about a small-ctilt is correct. Aitionexposure to smaller firms resultein a positive performanof 0.02% for the Size factor.A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%). 如题

2024-05-17 02:52 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202207040100000406 问题如下 Whiof Shaw’s comments about the MFC Value Funin Exhibit 1 is most accurate? The comment concerning: A.alph B.small-ctilt. C.value being out of favor. B is correct. Shaw’s comment about a small-ctilt is correct. Aitionexposure to smaller firms resultein a positive performanof 0.02% for the Size factor.A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%). A is incorrect. Alpha is finehere to inclu performanunexplainethe factors anmatches thof the benchmark.【alpha一般不是指porfolio return 超出benchmark 的部分么?原来的表述没有错,怎么理解这里的解析?】C is incorrect. Although the value style es appeto out of favor shown the lower return ththof the market (0.66% versus 0.71%), the Value factor ha positive contribution to the return (0.08%).【这里对比的数据都是用russle benchmark 那栏数据,和market那栏数据,没有用value fun 这里怎么理解呢?】

2024-01-20 15:49 1 · 回答