NO.PZ201809170400000402
问题如下：
Which of the following statements about the approaches and styles of either Furlings, Asgard, or Tokra is incorrect?
选项：
A.Furlings is a top-down sector rotator with a value orientation within sectors.
B.Asgard is a bottom-up manager with a GARP (growth at a reasonable price) style.
C.Tokra is a factor-based manager using value, growth, and profitability metrics.
解释：
C is an incorrect statement. Although Tokra is a factor manager, and although it uses a value proxy such as P/B and a profitability proxy such as return on assets, it does not use a growth proxy such as earnings growth over the last 12 or 36 months but rather a price momentum proxy.
A is a correct statement. Furlings is a top-down manager. It makes significant sector bets based on industry and economic indicators derived from the head manager’s experience, and it does select its securities within sectors while considering relative valuation.
B is a correct statement. Asgard favors securities that have reasonable valuations and aboveaverage growth prospects. It has a bottom-up approach and builds its portfolio starting at the security level.
老师好！
favoring firms that have good governance, strong growth potential, competitive advantages such as branding,
and attractive relative valuations.
看了之前同学的提问，解释说，因为要看历史数据，所以在 strong growth potential 和 attractive relative valuations 中选择了value。
但是这道大题的第一问，已经说了F用得fundamental方法，既然是fundamental，那不应该forecast，选 strong growth potential 吗？
谢谢！
