开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

何汶珈 · 2023年12月06日

为什么信用评级较低的企业 吸收ESG负面影响的能力会较弱

  1. ESG
  2. Engagement and stewardship

NO.PZ2022120701000063

问题如下：

A portfolio has equal holdings of the following investments:


According to PRI’s guide to ESG Engagement for Fixed Income Investors, which investment is most likely to be highest priority for engagement?

选项：

A.Bond 1 B.Bond 2 C.Bond 3

解释：

The guide recommends prioritizing engagement with issuers that have weak ESG scores and lower credit quality Bond 1 has the lowest credit score and along with Bond 3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritized because there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower credit quality are prioritized because they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts

为什么信用评级较低的企业 吸收ESG负面影响的能力较弱

添加评论
1 个答案

Tina_品职助教 · 2023年12月07日

嗨，从没放弃的小努力你好：



信用评级较低的企业吸收ESG（环境、社会和治理）负面影响的能力较弱，这一点可以从以下几个方面理解：

  1. 财务脆弱性：低信用评级通常意味着企业的财务状况不稳定或较弱。这样的公司可能有较高的债务水平、较低的利润率或现金流问题。当这些企业面临ESG相关的负面事件（如环境事故、社会责任问题、治理失败等）时，它们可能缺乏足够的财务资源来有效应对和缓解这些问题，从而导致更严重的财务影响。
  2. 市场和投资者信心：低信用评级的企业在市场上的信誉可能较低。当这些公司遭遇ESG问题时，可能会进一步削弱投资者和市场对其的信心，导致融资成本上升，投资减少，甚至股价下跌。
  3. 有限的应对能力：低信用评级的企业可能在资源分配上面临限制，无法充分投资于必要的ESG改进措施，如环保技术、社会责任项目或提高治理标准。这限制了它们在ESG领域的表现和改进能力。
  4. 长期影响：ESG问题往往与公司的长期持续性和声誉密切相关。对于信用评级较低的企业来说，ESG负面影响可能导致长期的经济和声誉损失，从而进一步恶化其财务和市场表现。

因此，低信用评级企业在面对ESG挑战时，其吸收和应对负面影响的能力通常较弱，这也是为什么投资指南会推荐优先与这类企业进行接触和合作，以促进它们在ESG方面的改进。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！

  • 1

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 242

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022120701000063问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1B.Bon2C.Bon3The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts为什么越差的越需要重点关注？时间成本多余吗？

2024-06-22 13:33 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts 为什么信用质量较低意味着他们不能够吸收ESG的负面影响？二者之间的关联是什么？

2024-06-17 22:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts 你们眼睛瞎了？1和3的ESG score是一样的，什么叫3是最低的分数？？？

2024-05-08 19:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1B.Bon2C.Bon3The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts既然债权参与有限，那为什么选a这种信用低，评分低的

2024-04-25 15:38 4 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000063 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui to ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers thhave weESG scores anlower cret quality Bon1 hthe lowest cret score analong with Bon3, the lowest ESG score Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts 3的信用评级高，但esg评分低，当esg暴雷的时候3的损失是更大的。 1的信用评级低，esg评分也低，减少投入就好啊。

2024-03-24 13:06 2 · 回答