开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

洋葱头 · 2023年11月04日

买入现货 同时买入put option 才是hedge吧?

NO.PZ2016032802000031

问题如下:

Steven, a manager of a hedge fund company, recently purchased a lot of Bubbles' common stock, and at the same time he sold put options on Bubbles' stock too. Because the clients knew the fund's general strategy in advance, so, he did not inform them anything about this trade. Did Steven violate the Code and Standards?

选项:

A.

No.

B.

Yes, because he manipulated publicly traded securities' prices.

C.

Yes, because he didn't inform clients about this trade before trading.

解释:

A is correct.

According to Standard II(B) Market Manipulation, Steven just used an arbitrage opportunity to gain some profit. This transaction is not a violation of the standard. And the clients all knew this kind of strategy in advance, so, Steven may not disclose this to his clients.

他是做对冲 当然应该是买入put option 或者sell call option 才是对冲 才和他的交易策略一致 这里是sell put option与交易策略不一致所以要告知啊 怎么是不违反呢?

2 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2023年11月05日

这个解释会不会太牵强 是策略但不代表是对冲策略 更何况客户知道是用对冲策略而被告知同向放大了头寸

客户已经提前知道了他的策略,对冲基金所使用的策略不是单纯的对冲策略,因为对冲基本本身就是高风险的基金投资,每一个客户都知道,并且题目中提到了,客户事先知道了他的策略,所以无需告知客户

王暄_品职助教 · 2023年11月04日

本题管理的是对冲基金,对冲基金的策略五花八门,非常多,不一定就是对冲。(且题目中也没有具体说他的策略是什么)

这个manager买入stocks + sell put 也是一种策略,说明他非常看重这只股票;而且题目中有说clients knew the fund's general strategy in advance,说明客户完全清楚他的策略是什么,所以根本不用披露。

洋葱头 · 2023年11月05日

这个解释会不会太牵强 是策略但不代表是对冲策略 更何况客户知道是用对冲策略而被告知同向放大了头寸

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 318

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2016032802000031问题如下Steven, a manager of a hee funcompany, recently purchasea lot of Bubbles' common stock, anthe same time he solput options on Bubbles' stotoo. Because the clients knew the funs generstrategy in aance, so, he not inform them anything about this tra. Steven violate the Co anStanr?A.No.B.Yes, because he manipulatepublicly trasecurities' prices.C.Yes, because he 't inform clients about this tra before trang.A is correct.Accorng to StanrII(Market Manipulation, Steven just usearbitrage opportunity to gain some profit. This transaction is not a violation of the stanr Anthe clients all knew this kinof strategy in aance, so, Steven mnot sclose this to his clients.我明白不违反IIB 但我想问问这是否违反其他准则?

2024-07-21 20:51 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2016032802000031 问题如下 Steven, a manager of a hee funcompany, recently purchasea lot of Bubbles' common stock, anthe same time he solput options on Bubbles' stotoo. Because the clients knew the funs generstrategy in aance, so, he not inform them anything about this tra. Steven violate the Co anStanr? A.No. B.Yes, because he manipulatepublicly trasecurities' prices. C.Yes, because he 't inform clients about this tra before trang. A is correct.Accorng to StanrII(Market Manipulation, Steven just usearbitrage opportunity to gain some profit. This transaction is not a violation of the stanr Anthe clients all knew this kinof strategy in aance, so, Steven mnot sclose this to his clients. 看之前的回答“当put exercise pricurrent stoprice时,put option不会行权,short put option 可以赚取期权费。当基金经理预测市场股价不会大跌时,预测put option不会行权,通过short put option可以增强投资收益。 ”麻烦老师给下“put option不会行权,short put option 可以赚取期权费”这句话。。。虽然听完了后面的课但是又迷糊了。。可以举个例子么,谢谢

2022-09-28 16:48 1 · 回答

    看了之前的回答还是不是很清楚a和c 因为虽然公司是做对冲并且客户知道公司的交易策略但是这次交易应该也对客户进行披露吧?

2019-05-01 21:05 1 · 回答

    请问这个不算manipulate吗?怎么分清操作和策略的区别啊??

2019-04-14 14:09 1 · 回答