开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

PASS · 2023年09月18日

不太明白為何A不對

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202110140100000408

问题如下:

Emily Yuen is a senior analyst for a consulting firm that specializes in assessing equity strategies using backtesting and simulation techniques. She is working with an assistant, Cameron Ruckey, to develop multifactor portfolio strategies based on nine factors common to the growth style of investing. To do so, Yuen and Ruckey plan to construct nine separate factor portfolios and then use them to create factor-weighted allocation portfolios.

Yuen tasks Ruckey with specifying the investment universe and determining the availability of appropriate reporting data in vendor databases. Ruckey selects a vendor database that does not provide point-in-time data, so he adjusts the database to include point-in-time constituent stocks and a reporting lag of four months.

Next, Yuen and Ruckey run initial backtests on the nine factor portfolios, calculating performance statistics and key metrics for each. For backtesting purposes, the portfolios are rebalanced monthly over a 30-year time horizon using a rolling-window procedure. Yuen and Ruckey consider a variety of metrics to assess the results of the factor portfolio backtests. Yuen asks Ruckey what can be concluded from the data for three of the factor strategies in Exhibit 1:

Exhibit 1 Backtest Metrics for Factor Strategies

Ruckey tells Yuen the following:

Statement 1 We do not need to consider maximum drawdown, because standard deviation sufficiently characterizes risk.

Statement 2 Factor 2 has the highest downside risk.

From her professional experience Yuen knows that benchmark and risk parity factor portfolios, in which factors are equally weighted and equally risk weighted, respectively, are popular with institutional and high-net-worth clients. To gain a more complete picture of these investment strategies’ performance, Yuen and Ruckey design a Benchmark Portfolio (A) and a Risk Parity Portfolio (B), and then run two simulation methods to generate investment performance data based on the underlying factor portfolios, assuming 1,000 simulation trials for each approach:

Approach 1 Historical simulation

Approach 2 Monte Carlo simulation

Yuen and Ruckey discuss the differences between the two approaches and then design the simulations, making key decisions at various steps. During the process, Yuen expresses a number of concerns:

Concern 1: Returns from six of the nine factors are correlated.

Concern 2: The distribution of Factor 1 returns exhibits excess kurtosis and negative skewness.

Concern 3: The number of simulations needed for Approach 1 is larger than the size of the historical dataset.

For each approach, Yuen and Ruckey run 1,000 trials to obtain 1,000 returns for Portfolios A and B. To help understand the effect of the skewness and excess kurtosis observed in the Factor 1 returns on the performance of Portfolios A and B, Ruckey suggests simulating an additional 1,000 factor returns using a multivariate skewed Student’s t-distribution, then repeating the Approach 2 simulation.


The process Ruckey suggests to better understand how the performance of Portfolios A and B using Approach 2 is affected by the distribution of Factor 1 returns is best described as:

选项:

A.data snooping.

B.sensitivity analysis.

C.inverse transformation.

解释:

B is correct.

Sensitivity analysis can be implemented to help managers understand how the target variable (portfolio returns) and risk profiles are affected by changes in input variables. Approach 2 is a Monte Carlo simulation, and the results depend on whether the multivariate normal distribution is the correct functional form or a reasonable proxy for the true distribution. Because this information is almost never known, sensitivity analysis using a multivariate skewed Student’s t-distribution helps to account for empirical properties such as the skewness and the excess kurtosis observed in the underlying factor return data.

A is incorrect. Data snooping is the subconscious or conscious manipulation of data in a way that produces a statistically significant result (i.e., a p-value that is sufficiently small or a t-statistic that is sufficiently large to indicate statistically significance).

C is incorrect. The inverse transformation method is the process of converting a randomly generated number into a simulated value of a random variable.

不太明白為何A不對?

1 个答案

星星_品职助教 · 2023年09月20日

同学你好,

data snooping是反复的在数据里搜寻,直到硬凑出来一条“规律”。即将偶然的巧合硬说成必然。这种人为的“规律”只适用于当下的数据集,无法推广。

本题是加入skewness和excess kurtosis这两个因子后再重新做模拟。并不是数据集里反复搜寻和强行找规律。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 515

    浏览
相关问题