开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

xiaodi · 2023年08月26日

在consolidation方法下,关联交易如何处理

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202304050100008501

问题如下:

Trana, which reports under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), is a Sweden-based retailer operating stores in three geographic locations: Sweden, the eurozone (with a current presence only in France, Germany, and Italy), and the United States. The stores in the eurozone and the United States are operated through a wholly owned subsidiary in each region. The income statements are presented in Exhibit 1.

Exhibit 1 Trana AB Income Statements for the Years Ended 31 December


In 2012, at the start of Trana’s expansion into North American markets, the company established a subsidiary, Anart Inc., in a South American country to benefit from lower labor and shipping costs. The details of the Anart investment are as follows:

Anart is 80% owned by Trana with 20% local investment.

It sells all of its production to Trana and Trana’s other subsidiaries and determines the transfer price as full cost plus 5%.

In 2015, sales (in millions) from Anart to Trana companies were SEK4,485 with net profit of SEK204.

The corporate tax rate in the country is 10%.

Eriksson reminds Lars that there is a proposal in Sweden to reduce the corporate tax rate from the current 22% to 16.5%. He would like to provide pro-forma disclosures related to the potential change in net income this change could provide for Trana. He reminds Lars that the average tax rate for the eurozone countries where Trana operates is 30% and 25% in the United States. Sweden operates under a tax treaty with all countries in which it has subsidiaries, such that it will owe taxes on foreign earned income to the extent that the Swedish rate exceeds the foreign rate.


(1) If the proposed reduction in Swedish tax rates had been in effect in 2015, the increase in Trana’s net profit (in SEK millions) would have been closest to:

选项:

A.

SEK31.2.

B.

SEK18.6.

C.

SEK29.8.

解释:

The proposed change in Swedish tax rates would have affected the income earned in Sweden (SEK338 before tax) and the pre-tax income earned in the South American subsidiary (SEK227, see calculation in following table) because the tax rate there is lower than in Sweden and hence subject to tax at Swedish rates. The income earned in tax jurisdictions with rates higher than Sweden’s (Europe and the United States) are not subject to tax in Sweden and thus would not have been affected.


* To calculate EBT, divide net profit of SEK204 by (1 – tax rate): 204/(1 – 0.10) = SEK227.

这道题在算母公司利润的时候把南美子公司的利润加上了。

但是在consolidation方法下,这属于intercompany tranactions,首先在sales这里不能合并,其次在NI上,要减去unearned revenue。

为什么这道题要把南美子公司的利润加上去,题目上说子公司的货都卖给了母公司,应该属于intercompany tranactions吧?

就好像一个公司成立了SPE,spe所有来自母公司的revenue都不会被合并一样。

3 个答案
已采纳答案

王园圆_品职助教 · 2023年08月28日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


同学你好,这两道题助教咨询了专业的会计人士,得到的结论如下

首先,在母子公司完全合并财务报表的情况下,sales肯定是不能合并的(对应你给出题号的那个问题,因为那个问题是问sales能合并多少)——无论子公司卖给母公司的这个货物是否已经全部对外销售出去或只是部分销售出去了。假设子公司此时卖给母公司的货物已经100%被母公司转手销售出去了,最后母公司合并报表上也只能确认最后母公司的销售额,而对应的COGS则记录子公司最开始生产这批产品所产生的COGS。这样才不会造成sales虚高,同时合理在合并报表上反映了集团公司的毛利润——反映在你说的那道题上,就是哪怕假设子公司全部的产品都已经被母公司100%销售出去了,也不影响答案依然是合并sales为0%

其次,NI要合并,前提假设就是子公司的货物是100%被母公司对外销售了。因为子公司如果有部分货物未被母公司卖出,那这部分母公司未卖出的货物就会反映在合并报表的存货里而不反映在合并报表的COGS里面,而合并报表的sales只反映母公司最终销售的金额,那这部分子公司的NI其实就无法反映在合并报表里面了——所以回到本题,因为题目没有说子公司的产品有未被卖出的,所以我们就默认已经全部对外卖出了,就可以得出本题的答案

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

王园圆_品职助教 · 2023年08月26日

同学你好,这类题目,其实唯一的判断标准是你通过题目看出题人到底想要考察什么?

本题“ If the proposed reduction in Swedish tax rates had been in effect in 2015, the increase in Trana’s net profit (in SEK millions) would have been closest to“这里加粗的部分,特意强调了瑞典降税对NI的影响,所以题目要考察的肯定不是”合并报表中NI是否需要剔除关联交易“这个知识点,而是别的和税相关的内容

而如果想要考察关联交易相关内容,题目就应该会更明显的提示”关联交易的销售中有多少比例没有卖出“这个信息,并且题目本身应该不会提及税务相关的内容,否则这道题目就出的有问题了

至于你说的”我记得应该还有一道类似的题问合并报表对sales的影响,那题也是关联交易,sales不能包含,我记得选项是0%。 “,助教没有这类题目的印象了,所以同学如果方便麻烦提供一下题目的截图或题目的来源,这样助教也可以跟你进一步讨论那道题和本题的不同点哦

xiaodi · 2023年08月27日

No.PZ2023040501000020来源: 经典题 In 2012, at the start of Trana’s expansion into North Ame,Anart is 80% owned by Trana 。It sells all of its production to Trana and Trana’s other subsidiaries and determines the transfer price as full cost plus 5%....... 题干其实是一样的,sales合并后占0%

王园圆_品职助教 · 2023年08月26日

同学你好,首先,子公司和母公司的关联交易并不是一定不能确认为收入的哦!前提是有一部分产品没有被集团卖出的话,这部分未卖出的部分才不能确认为收入的

而本题没有任何一个信息指出子公司卖给集团其他公司的产品有未被卖出的部分,所以我们应该默认已经全部卖出并正常确认收入


xiaodi · 2023年08月26日

我问这个问题还有另外一个原因,这个case后面还有一题,我之前在有问必答问过。说因为南美子公司的税低,所以可以把收入都确认在南美子公司。我当时认为这是在虚增收入,因为这是明显的关联交易。 而在考虑SPE的时候,合并SPE least likely 增加revenue。我记得应该还有一道类似的题问合并报表对sales的影响,那题也是关联交易,sales不能包含,我记得选项是0%。 我认为这几个讲的是同一件事情。这种题很难区别这个交易是不是有没有再转卖出去。

  • 3

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 271

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202304050100008501 问题如下 (1) If the proposerection in Swesh trates hbeen in effein 2015, the increase in Trana’s net profit (in SEK millions) woulhave been closest to: A.SEK31.2. B.SEK18.6. C.SEK29.8. The proposechange in Swesh trates woulhave affectethe income earnein Swen (SEK338 before tax) anthe pre-tincome earnein the South Americsubsiary (SEK227, see calculation in following table) because the trate there is lower thin Swen anhensubjeto tSwesh rates. The income earnein tjurisctions with rates higher thSwen’s (Europe anthe UniteStates) are not subjeto tin Swen anthus woulnot have been affecte* To calculate EBT, vi net profit of SEK204 (1 – trate): 204/(1 – 0.10) = SEK227. 这个204不是已经含进264里面了吗?为啥还要重复计算题目给了母公司合并报表,E338,NI264。并且已知占子公司80%股权。这种情况肯定得并表。也就是说母公司的报表,已经是合并子公司以后的了,已经不需要再考虑子公司的情况了。为啥不直接选B,用(338 - 338*16.5%)-264

2024-05-19 10:21 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202304050100008501问题如下 (1) If the proposerection in Swesh trates hbeen in effein 2015, the increase in Trana’s net profit (in SEK millions) woulhave been closest to: A.SEK31.2.B.SEK18.6.C.SEK29.8. The proposechange in Swesh trates woulhave affectethe income earnein Swen (SEK338 before tax) anthe pre-tincome earnein the South Americsubsiary (SEK227, see calculation in following table) because the trate there is lower thin Swen anhensubjeto tSwesh rates. The income earnein tjurisctions with rates higher thSwen’s (Europe anthe UniteStates) are not subjeto tin Swen anthus woulnot have been affecte* To calculate EBT, vi net profit of SEK204 (1 – trate): 204/(1 – 0.10) = SEK227. 为什么没有乘以80%?母公司只拥有子公司80% 分享收益不乘以比例吗?还是说只有NI是按比例合并的 而EBI是全额的 因为EBI还没扣除少数股东收益?

2024-04-14 22:40 2 · 回答

NO.PZ202304050100008501 问题如下 (1) If the proposerection in Swesh trates hbeen in effein 2015, the increase in Trana’s net profit (in SEK millions) woulhave been closest to: A.SEK31.2. B.SEK18.6. C.SEK29.8. The proposechange in Swesh trates woulhave affectethe income earnein Swen (SEK338 before tax) anthe pre-tincome earnein the South Americsubsiary (SEK227, see calculation in following table) because the trate there is lower thin Swen anhensubjeto tSwesh rates. The income earnein tjurisctions with rates higher thSwen’s (Europe anthe UniteStates) are not subjeto tin Swen anthus woulnot have been affecte* To calculate EBT, vi net profit of SEK204 (1 – trate): 204/(1 – 0.10) = SEK227. 这道题涉及财务报表合并,看了老师的经典题通关课,有个问题不理解既然Anart已经按照当地10%的税率缴了税,那么合并报表以后,是否还是要按照Swen当地的要求再次缴税?(也就是双重缴税)这道题说的,是不是Swen当地对于合并报表后,集团税收变化对于NI的影响?

2023-09-08 20:36 2 · 回答

NO.PZ202304050100008501问题如下 (1) If the proposerection in Swesh trates hbeen in effein 2015, the increase in Trana’s net profit (in SEK millions) woulhave been closest to: A.SEK31.2.B.SEK18.6.C.SEK29.8. The proposechange in Swesh trates woulhave affectethe income earnein Swen (SEK338 before tax) anthe pre-tincome earnein the South Americsubsiary (SEK227, see calculation in following table) because the trate there is lower thin Swen anhensubjeto tSwesh rates. The income earnein tjurisctions with rates higher thSwen’s (Europe anthe UniteStates) are not subjeto tin Swen anthus woulnot have been affecte* To calculate EBT, vi net profit of SEK204 (1 – trate): 204/(1 – 0.10) = SEK227. 如何理解答案中“because the South Americsubsiary trate there is lower thin Swen anhensubjeto tSwesh rates”,此外该题所考知识点是在哪里?

2023-07-21 13:11 2 · 回答