不是low-yielding吗 我觉得符合K的preference啊 还是因为20%太aggressive了？

问题如下：

Kelly Amadon, CFA, an investment adviser, has two clients: Ryan Randolf, 65 years old, and Keiko Kitagawa, 45 years old. Both clients earn the same amount in salary. Randolf, however, has a large amount of assets, whereas Kitagawa has few assets outside her investment portfolio. Randolf is single and willing to invest a portion of his assets very aggressively; Kitagawa wants to achieve a steady rate of return with low volatility so she can pay for her child's current college expenses. Amadon recommends investing 20% of both clients' portfolios in the stock of very low-yielding smallcap companies. Amadon least likely violated the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct in regard to his investment recommendations for:

选项：

A.only Randolf's portfolio. B.only Kitagawa's portfolio. C.both clients' portfolios.

解释：

In Randolf's case, the investment may be appropriate given this client's financial circumstances and aggressive investment position. This investment would not be suitable for Kitagawa because of her need for a steady rate of return and her low-risk profile.