开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

六姑娘 · 2023年08月03日

这题正确答案是a还是b?

NO.PZ2023021602000069

问题如下:

Willier is the research analyst responsible for following Company X. All the information he has accumulated and documented suggests that the outlook for the company's new products is poor, so the stock should be rated a weak "hold." During lunch, however, Willier overhears a financial analyst from another firm whom he respects offer opinions that conflict with Willier's forecasts and expectations. Upon returning to his office, Willier releases a strong "buy" recommendation to the public. Willier:

选项:

A.Violated the Standards by failing to distinguish between facts and opinions I his recommendation.

B.Violated the Standards because he did not have a reasonable and adequate basis for his recommendation.

C.Was in full compliance with the Standards.

解释:

This question relates to Standard V(A)-Diligence and Reasonable Basis. The opinion of another financial analyst is not an adequate basis for Willier's action in changing the recommendation. Answer C is thus incorrect. So is answer A because, although it is true that members and candidates must distinguish between facts and opinions in recommendations, the question does not illustrate a violation of that nature. If the opinion overheard by Willier had sparked him to conduct additional research and investigation that justified a change of opinion, then a changed recommendation would be appropriate.

这题正确答案是a还是b?

1 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2023年08月03日

本题正确答案:B

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 264

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023021602000069 问题如下 Willier is the researanalyst responsible for following Company X. All the information he haccumulateancumentesuggests ththe outlook for the company's new procts is poor, so the stoshoulratea we\"hol\" ring lunch, however, Willier overhears a financianalyst from another firm whom he respects offer opinions thconfliwith Willier's forecasts anexpectations. Upon returning to his office, Willier releases a strong \"buy\" recommention to the publiWillier: A.Violatethe Stanr failing to stinguish between facts anopinions I his recommention. B.Violatethe Stanr because he not have a reasonable anaquate basis for his recommention. C.Win full complianwith the Stanr. This question relates to StanrV(A)-ligenanReasonable Basis. The opinion of another financianalyst is not aquate basis for Willier's action in changing the recommention. Answer C is thus incorrect. So is answer A because, although it is true thmembers ancantes must stinguish between facts anopinions in recommentions, the question es not illustrate a violation of thnature. If the opinion overhearWillier hsparkehim to conaitionresearaninvestigation thjustifiea change of opinion, then a changerecommention woulappropriate. although it is true thmembers ancantes must stinguish between facts anopinions in recommentions, the question es not illustrate a violation of thnature. If the opinion overhearWillier hsparkehim to conaitionresearaninvestigation thjustifiea change of opinion, then a changerecommention woulappropriate.我现在有点confuse 在做其他题目里应该怎么区分这两个呢?

2024-07-12 21:03 1 · 回答