开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

410140980 · 2023年07月31日

Ashanti gold company

NO.PZ2022071101000008

问题如下:

A risk manager at a bank is seeking to better understand recent liquidity risk failures. Several real-life cases are reviewed. Which of the following lessons would be best illustrated by the case of Metallgesellschaft in 1993?

选项:

A.

Negative public perception of emergency borrowing from the central bank can cause a bank run.

B.

Positive feedback trading in illiquid instruments can cause excessive losses.

C.

Hedging liabilities by rolling forward futures contracts may create cash flow mismatches.

D.

Futures provide a better effective hedge for hedging commodities exposure than forwards.

解释:

中文解析:

C是正确的。德国金属公司这是由于追加保证金通知而导致的现金流不匹配的一个经典案例。

A不正确。这种情况发生在2007年的北岩银行的案例中。

B不正确。这种情况发生在1998年的LTCM身上。

D不正确。远期和期货都可用于对冲大宗商品敞口,但当存在现金流不匹配时,两者都可能导致流动性风险。

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C is correct. This is a classic case of cash flow mismatch due to margin calls.

A is incorrect. This scenario happened to Northern Rock in 2007.

B is incorrect. This scenario happened to LTCM in 1998.

D is incorrect. Both forwards and futures can be used to hedge commodities exposure, but both can cause liquidity risk when a cash flow mismatch is present.

老师这道题当中C选项是不是也适用西亚金矿公司

1 个答案

李坏_品职助教 · 2023年08月01日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


你说的是west African吧,是西非的金矿公司:

west African主要是因为政府突然宣布缩减金矿的产量,导致金矿暴涨。而公司是做空金矿远期合约,所以亏损惨烈,无法补足保证金。


而德国金属公司是因为rolling期货合约带来现金流压力而出现了危险,还是不太一样的。

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 3460

    浏览
相关问题