嗨森 · 2023年07月25日
NO.PZ2022120702000011
问题如下：
Which approach is most likely to result in an analyst aggregating data into an ESG score?选项：
A.Company specific research. B.Fundamental analysis. C.Stock picking. D.Quantitative modelling.解释：
选项D正确，量化模型的方法最可能使分析师将数据聚合为ESG评分。考察哪个知识点，在讲义哪里呢
NO.PZ2022120702000011问题如下Whiapproais most likely to result in analyst aggregating ta into ESG score?A.Company specific research.B.Funmentanalysis.C.Stopicking.Quantitative molling.确，量化模型的方法最可能使分析师将数据聚合为ESG评分。A为什么不对？对特定公司的分析，不是也应该考虑esg评分吗？
NO.PZ2022120702000011 问题如下 Whiapproais most likely to result in analyst aggregating ta into ESG score? A.Company specific research. B.Funmentanalysis. C.Stopicking. Quantitative molling. 确，量化模型的方法最可能使分析师将数据聚合为ESG评分。 为什么选股不涉及到对数据的分析整合？
NO.PZ2022120702000011问题如下Whiapproais most likely to result in analyst aggregating ta into ESG score?A.Company specific research.B.Funmentanalysis.C.Stopicking.Quantitative molling.确，量化模型的方法最可能使分析师将数据聚合为ESG评分。老师请问，基本面分析不需要结合ESG分数吗
NO.PZ2022120702000011 问题如下 Whiapproais most likely to result in analyst aggregating ta into ESG score? A.Company specific research. B.Funmentanalysis. C.Stopicking. Quantitative molling. 确，量化模型的方法最可能使分析师将数据聚合为ESG评分。 如题
