开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

· 2023年07月05日

B选项理解

  1. FRM II
  2. Market Risk Measurement And Management

NO.PZ2018122701000044

问题如下：

Under these assumptions - in particular: a flat yield curve and constant yield volatility of 1.0% - why can we expect cash flow mapping to produce a lower diversified VaR than either duration and principal mapping?

选项：

A.

The risk measures are non-linear.

B.

Due to imperfect correlations between pairwise risk factors.

C.

Fewer total cash flows will be mapped.

D.

We cannot expect a lower diversified VaR.

解释：

B is correct.

考点 ： Mapping to Fixed Income Portfolios

解析 ： The diversified VaR is lower due to two factors. First, risk measures are not perfectly linear with maturity. Second, correlations are below unity, which reduces risk even further.

老师好，请问这个b选项说的是后面会提到的component risk吗？然后还想问一下课堂上说的convexity是指三种mapping都会遇到的还是就第二种duration mapping跟麦考利久期有关才是呈现凸性呢？谢谢！

添加评论
1 个答案

DD仔_品职助教 · 2023年07月06日

嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：


同学你好，

你说的是第四张会学到的correlation risk吗？不是说的一个东西

这里B选项讲的是，假设收益率曲线是水平的，波动σ稳定，所以各个利率点上的VaR是一样的，所以在计算整体的 diversified VaR 时，利用CF mapping来计算的话，时会考虑到各种风险因子的，那么风险因子之间的correlation<1，就会产生分散化效果。所以可以导致CFmapping更小。

Duration mapping是没有考虑到convexity的，因为利率变动导致的价格变动是包含一阶导和二阶导的关系的，那么一阶导是duration，二阶导就是convexity，duration mapping之所以叫duration mapping就是因为他只考虑到了duration，是没有考虑到convexity的。如果说从考虑的是否全面角度出发，CF mapping是最全面的。因为principle mapping只考虑principle，duration mapping只考虑duration。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来，我们正在朝着它而去，加油！

  • 1

    回答

  • 1

    关注

  • 340

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2018122701000044 问题如下 Unr these assumptions - in particular: a flat yielcurve anconstant yielvolatility of 1.0% - why cwe expecash flow mapping to proa lower versifieVtheither ration anprincipal mapping? The risk measures are non-linear. e to imperfecorrelations between pairwise risk factors. Fewer totcash flows will mappe We cannot expea lower versifieVaR. B is correct. 考点 &#xFF1A; Mapping to FixeIncome Portfolios 解析 &#xFF1A; The versifieVis lower e to two factors. First, risk measures are not perfectly linewith maturity. Secon correlations are below unity, whireces risk even further. 如题

2024-03-05 03:24 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000044 问题如下 Unr these assumptions - in particular: a flat yielcurve anconstant yielvolatility of 1.0% - why cwe expecash flow mapping to proa lower versifieVtheither ration anprincipal mapping? The risk measures are non-linear. e to imperfecorrelations between pairwise risk factors. Fewer totcash flows will mappe We cannot expea lower versifieVaR. B is correct. 考点 &#xFF1A; Mapping to FixeIncome Portfolios 解析 &#xFF1A; The versifieVis lower e to two factors. First, risk measures are not perfectly linewith maturity. Secon correlations are below unity, whireces risk even further. versifieV是指什么？是不是只有Mapping 才有versifieVaR, 因为只有Mapping考虑multiple risk factors？

2022-09-07 11:52 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000044 e to imperfecorrelations between pairwise risk factors. Fewer totcash flows will mappe We cannot expea lower versifieVaR. B is correct. 考点 Mapping to FixeIncome Portfolios 解析 The versifieVis lower e to two factors. First, risk measures are not perfectly linewith maturity. Secon correlations are below unity, whireces risk even further. mapping 难道不是一定大于本金mapping的吗 为什么会小 题干对sigma的描述说明了什么

2022-03-15 09:01 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2018122701000044

2022-03-03 22:03 3 · 回答