开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

mushkc · 2023年06月20日

liquidity management

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202205190400000102

问题如下:

Q. Discuss actions that Grides should take to alleviate Brodka’s concerns.

选项:

解释:

Solution

As a result of the allocation changes, there will be a reduction in the liquid and semi-liquid categories and an increase in the illiquid category under both normal and stress conditions. The proposed allocation shifting 5% of the endowment’s investments from liquid to illiquid assets would result in an increase in the overall illiquidity profile.

Regarding Brodka’s concern about the liquidity profile, Grides needs to ensure that even under stress conditions the proposed allocation continues to comply with the liquidity budgeting framework in place. From an ongoing management perspective—and particularly at times when the liquidity profile of the proposed allocation is closer to the minimum thresholds set through the liquidity budget—Grides should plan to closely monitor the portfolio’s liquidity profile and stress test it periodically to make sure portfolio liquidity remains adequate.

Regarding Brodka’s concern of risk profile “drift,” illiquid assets carry extremely high rebalancing costs. Because asset liquidity tends to decrease in periods of market stress, it is important to have sufficient liquid assets and rebalancing mechanisms in place to ensure the portfolio’s risk profile remains within acceptable risk targets and does not “drift” as the relative valuations of different asset classes fluctuate during stress periods. Since liquid assets will decrease due to the proposed allocation, Grides must ensure an effective rebalancing mechanism is adopted prior to the investment and is consistently followed thereafter. That mechanism can either be through a systematic discipline, such as calendar rebalancing or percent-range rebalancing that set pre-specified tolerance bands for asset weights. Or, an automatic rebalancing method can be adopted, such as by using adjustments to a public market allocation that is correlated to a private market allocation (likely a more illiquid exposure) to rebalance private market risk.

Contrary to its desired intent, and providing grounds for Brodka’s concerns, this design would exacerbate the endowment’s liquidity needs in severe market downturns. Given the possibility of such adverse events within Kemney’s long-term planning horizon, the policy is very relevant as potentially introducing undesired risks.

题干有三个concerns

1)reduce the liquidity profile of the endowment,

2)induce “drift” in the portfolio’s risk profile in times of market stress, or

3)alter the endowment’s overall risk profile.


答案中解决了前两个concern,没有解决的三个concern吧?不是需要依次解决问题吗?


1 个答案
已采纳答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2023年06月21日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


题干有三个concerns


1)reduce the liquidity profile of the endowment,


2)induce “drift” in the portfolio’s risk profile in times of market stress, or


3)alter the endowment’s overall risk profile.


答案中解决了前两个concern,没有解决的三个concern吧?不是需要依次解决问题吗?


同学,您提出的问题很好。


确实,文章中只解决了前两个concern,即减少基金的流动性和在市场压力下引起风险配置的漂移。


至于第三个concern,即改变基金的整体风险配置,文章中并没有提到相应的解决方案。然而,文章提到了在市场压力下进行风险再平衡的必要性,这可以确保基金的风险配置保持在可接受的风险目标之内,但并没有具体提到如何处理整体风险配置的问题。不过我们考试中其实根据题目的分数也可以判断答几点,如果给的答题时间是4分或者2分,答两点可以拿到满分的。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 456

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202205190400000102问题如下Q. scuss actions thGris shoultake to alleviate Broa’s concerns.Solutiona result of the allocation changes, there will a rection in the liquiansemi-liquicategories anincrease in the illiquicategory unr both normanstress contions. The proposeallocation shifting 5% of the enwment’s investments from liquito illiquiassets woulresult in increase in the overall illiquity profile.Regarng Broa’s concern about the liquity profile, Gris nee to ensure theven unr stress contions the proposeallocation continues to comply with the liquity bueting framework in place. From ongoing management perspective—anparticularly times when the liquity profile of the proposeallocation is closer to the minimum threshol set through the liquity buet—Gris shoulplto closely monitor the portfolio’s liquity profile anstress test it periocally to make sure portfolio liquity remains aquate.Regarng Broa’s concern of risk profile “ift,” illiquiassets carry extremely high rebalancing costs. Because asset liquity ten to crease in perio of market stress, it is important to have sufficient liquiassets anrebalancing mechanisms in plato ensure the portfolio’s risk profile remains within acceptable risk targets anes not “ift” the relative valuations of fferent asset classes fluctuate ring stress perio. Sinliquiassets will crease e to the proposeallocation, Gris must ensure effective rebalancing mechanism is apteprior to the investment anis consistently followethereafter. Thmechanism ceither through a systematic scipline, sucalenr rebalancing or percent-range rebalancing thset pre-specifietoleranban for asset weights. Or, automatic rebalancing methocapte suusing austments to a public market allocation this correlateto a private market allocation (likely a more illiquiexposure) to rebalanprivate market risk.Contrary to its sireintent, anproving groun for Broa’s concerns, this sign woulexacerbate the enwment’s liquity nee in severe market wnturns. Given the possibility of suaerse events within Kemney’s long-term planning horizon, the poliis very relevant potentially introcing unsirerisks.如题,不太能理解proposeilliqui例高是想表达什么意思?

2023-11-10 10:15 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202205190400000102 问题如下 Q. scuss actions thGris shoultake to alleviate Broa’s concerns. Solutiona result of the allocation changes, there will a rection in the liquiansemi-liquicategories anincrease in the illiquicategory unr both normanstress contions. The proposeallocation shifting 5% of the enwment’s investments from liquito illiquiassets woulresult in increase in the overall illiquity profile.Regarng Broa’s concern about the liquity profile, Gris nee to ensure theven unr stress contions the proposeallocation continues to comply with the liquity bueting framework in place. From ongoing management perspective—anparticularly times when the liquity profile of the proposeallocation is closer to the minimum threshol set through the liquity buet—Gris shoulplto closely monitor the portfolio’s liquity profile anstress test it periocally to make sure portfolio liquity remains aquate.Regarng Broa’s concern of risk profile “ift,” illiquiassets carry extremely high rebalancing costs. Because asset liquity ten to crease in perio of market stress, it is important to have sufficient liquiassets anrebalancing mechanisms in plato ensure the portfolio’s risk profile remains within acceptable risk targets anes not “ift” the relative valuations of fferent asset classes fluctuate ring stress perio. Sinliquiassets will crease e to the proposeallocation, Gris must ensure effective rebalancing mechanism is apteprior to the investment anis consistently followethereafter. Thmechanism ceither through a systematic scipline, sucalenr rebalancing or percent-range rebalancing thset pre-specifietoleranban for asset weights. Or, automatic rebalancing methocapte suusing austments to a public market allocation this correlateto a private market allocation (likely a more illiquiexposure) to rebalanprivate market risk.Contrary to its sireintent, anproving groun for Broa’s concerns, this sign woulexacerbate the enwment’s liquity nee in severe market wnturns. Given the possibility of suaerse events within Kemney’s long-term planning horizon, the poliis very relevant potentially introcing unsirerisks. 请问 risk profile “ift“是什么意思啊,在哪里讲到了啊

2023-10-19 10:23 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202205190400000102 问题如下 Q. scuss actions thGris shoultake to alleviate Broa’s concerns. Solutiona result of the allocation changes, there will a rection in the liquiansemi-liquicategories anincrease in the illiquicategory unr both normanstress contions. The proposeallocation shifting 5% of the enwment’s investments from liquito illiquiassets woulresult in increase in the overall illiquity profile.Regarng Broa’s concern about the liquity profile, Gris nee to ensure theven unr stress contions the proposeallocation continues to comply with the liquity bueting framework in place. From ongoing management perspective—anparticularly times when the liquity profile of the proposeallocation is closer to the minimum threshol set through the liquity buet—Gris shoulplto closely monitor the portfolio’s liquity profile anstress test it periocally to make sure portfolio liquity remains aquate.Regarng Broa’s concern of risk profile “ift,” illiquiassets carry extremely high rebalancing costs. Because asset liquity ten to crease in perio of market stress, it is important to have sufficient liquiassets anrebalancing mechanisms in plato ensure the portfolio’s risk profile remains within acceptable risk targets anes not “ift” the relative valuations of fferent asset classes fluctuate ring stress perio. Sinliquiassets will crease e to the proposeallocation, Gris must ensure effective rebalancing mechanism is apteprior to the investment anis consistently followethereafter. Thmechanism ceither through a systematic scipline, sucalenr rebalancing or percent-range rebalancing thset pre-specifietoleranban for asset weights. Or, automatic rebalancing methocapte suusing austments to a public market allocation this correlateto a private market allocation (likely a more illiquiexposure) to rebalanprivate market risk.Contrary to its sireintent, anproving groun for Broa’s concerns, this sign woulexacerbate the enwment’s liquity nee in severe market wnturns. Given the possibility of suaerse events within Kemney’s long-term planning horizon, the poliis very relevant potentially introcing unsirerisks. 另外,第二问的答案真的很长,能总结下考试答题要点么,谢谢啦

2023-09-23 12:21 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202205190400000102 问题如下 Q. scuss actions thGris shoultake to alleviate Broa’s concerns. Solutiona result of the allocation changes, there will a rection in the liquiansemi-liquicategories anincrease in the illiquicategory unr both normanstress contions. The proposeallocation shifting 5% of the enwment’s investments from liquito illiquiassets woulresult in increase in the overall illiquity profile.Regarng Broa’s concern about the liquity profile, Gris nee to ensure theven unr stress contions the proposeallocation continues to comply with the liquity bueting framework in place. From ongoing management perspective—anparticularly times when the liquity profile of the proposeallocation is closer to the minimum threshol set through the liquity buet—Gris shoulplto closely monitor the portfolio’s liquity profile anstress test it periocally to make sure portfolio liquity remains aquate.Regarng Broa’s concern of risk profile “ift,” illiquiassets carry extremely high rebalancing costs. Because asset liquity ten to crease in perio of market stress, it is important to have sufficient liquiassets anrebalancing mechanisms in plato ensure the portfolio’s risk profile remains within acceptable risk targets anes not “ift” the relative valuations of fferent asset classes fluctuate ring stress perio. Sinliquiassets will crease e to the proposeallocation, Gris must ensure effective rebalancing mechanism is apteprior to the investment anis consistently followethereafter. Thmechanism ceither through a systematic scipline, sucalenr rebalancing or percent-range rebalancing thset pre-specifietoleranban for asset weights. Or, automatic rebalancing methocapte suusing austments to a public market allocation this correlateto a private market allocation (likely a more illiquiexposure) to rebalanprivate market risk.Contrary to its sireintent, anproving groun for Broa’s concerns, this sign woulexacerbate the enwment’s liquity nee in severe market wnturns. Given the possibility of suaerse events within Kemney’s long-term planning horizon, the poliis very relevant potentially introcing unsirerisks. 不知道如何下手

2023-05-15 23:38 1 · 回答