开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

潞河 · 2023年06月15日

A

NO.PZ2022120703000051

问题如下:

A top-down engagement style most likely:

选项:

A.aligns more closely with active rather than passive portfolios.

B.involves discussions with the boards of individual companies.

C.focuses on environmental and social issues rather than governance issues.

解释:

C is correct because "teams tend to focus on individual environmental and social issues and to pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets as a whole...while firms with governance heritage tend to focus on individual companies...these are generalisations but they illustrate the distinction between top-down and bottom-up activity." Hence, firms with environmental-led heritage typically engage in top-down activity while governance-led firms focus on bottom-up activity.

A is incorrect because "company-focused, bottom-up engagement fits most naturally with active investment approaches...whereas issue-based, top-down engagement tends to align more closely with passive or otherwise broadly diversified investment portfolios."

B is incorrect because "teams tend to focus on individual environmental and social issues and to pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets as a whole...while firms with governance heritage tend to focus on individual companies, starting with the chair...and working through the board...these are generalisations but they illustrate the distinction between top-down and bottom-up activity." Hence, it is the bottom-up activity (associated with firms with governance heritage) which involves contacting individual companies.

老师请问A选项是什么,

3 个答案

王岑 · 2023年07月14日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


第四版的官方教材的结论与我们的讲义是完全一致的:

Top-down和Bottom-up,Issue-based和Company-focused,可以理解为参与风格的两种不同的分类。在Top-down和Bottom-up这种分类方法中,E和S是从一个行业或者问题出发,因此是Top-down,在和公司沟通时,先从投资者关系出发,然后逐步向上升级。G是从单个公司出发,因此参与风格是Bottom-up,但是在实际行动中,是先从董事会出发,再到管理层。

而Issue-based和Company-focused是参与风格的另外一种分类。被动投资者更可能用Issue-based,因为被动投资者一般而言持有分散化的投资组合,因此希望从一个问题出发,来解决被这个问题影响的所有公司。主动投资者更可能是Company-focused,因为主动投资者一般而言是专注于某个公司,进行更深度的参与,因此是想从高管出发,全面解决这个公司面临的各项问题。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

王岑 · 2023年07月13日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


上面的表述更正一下:自上而下的方法适合被动管理的投资组合,自下而上的方法更适合主动管理的投资组合。这里当作一个结论记住即可,因为考试时也会注重这个结论。具体可以参考一下这几页讲义的内容:

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

潞河 · 2023年07月14日

请问es和g自上而下和自下而上的参与v4版没有更新颠倒吗?自上而下不就是要和董事会沟通吗

潞河 · 2023年07月14日

希望能看一下第四版官方教材而不是讲义后作答

王岑 · 2023年06月16日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


A选项的意思是,自上而下的方法更符合主动管理的投资组合而不是被动的投资组合。这个说法是错误的。因为“自下而上”(Bottom-up)的方法,更符合主动投资,而自下而上的方法,更适合被动管理的投资组合。这个可以当作结论记住。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

潞河 · 2023年07月12日

老师您讲的好乱,到底自下而上适合什么?原理是什么呀

  • 3

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 637

    浏览
相关问题

答案判断及提示不正确 自上而下更关注的是治理问题。

2024-08-05 09:32 1 · 回答

解析错误 c的与答案正好相反

2024-07-17 19:06 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000051 问题如下 A top-wn engagement style most likely: A.aligns more closely with active rather thpassive portfolios. B.involves scussions with the boar of invicompanies. C.focuses on environmentansociissues rather thgovernanissues. C is correbecause \"teams tento focus on invienvironmentansociissues anto pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets a whole...while firms with governanheritage tento focus on invicompanies...these are generalisations but they illustrate the stinction between top-wn anbottom-up activity.\" Hence, firms with environmental-leheritage typically engage in top-wn activity while governance-lefirms focus on bottom-up activity.A is incorrebecause \"company-focuse bottom-up engagement fits most naturally with active investment approaches...whereissue-base top-wn engagement ten to align more closely with passive or otherwise broay versifieinvestment portfolios.\"B is incorrebecause \"teams tento focus on invienvironmentansociissues anto pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets a whole...while firms with governanheritage tento focus on invicompanies, starting with the chair...anworking through the boar..these are generalisations but they illustrate the stinction between top-wn anbottom-up activity.\" Hence, it is the bottom-up activity (associatewith firms with governanheritage) whiinvolves contacting invicompanies. 为什么E和S要至上而下,G要至下而上啊? 不理解 基础课程什么地方有具体讲解吗?

2023-12-22 13:13 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000051 问题如下 A top-wn engagement style most likely: A.aligns more closely with active rather thpassive portfolios. B.involves scussions with the boar of invicompanies. C.focuses on environmentansociissues rather thgovernanissues. C is correbecause \"teams tento focus on invienvironmentansociissues anto pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets a whole...while firms with governanheritage tento focus on invicompanies...these are generalisations but they illustrate the stinction between top-wn anbottom-up activity.\" Hence, firms with environmental-leheritage typically engage in top-wn activity while governance-lefirms focus on bottom-up activity.A is incorrebecause \"company-focuse bottom-up engagement fits most naturally with active investment approaches...whereissue-base top-wn engagement ten to align more closely with passive or otherwise broay versifieinvestment portfolios.\"B is incorrebecause \"teams tento focus on invienvironmentansociissues anto pursue those vigorously across sectors or markets a whole...while firms with governanheritage tento focus on invicompanies, starting with the chair...anworking through the boar..these are generalisations but they illustrate the stinction between top-wn anbottom-up activity.\" Hence, it is the bottom-up activity (associatewith firms with governanheritage) whiinvolves contacting invicompanies. 被动投资和主动投资的engagement metho什么本质区别吗?我理解主动需要更加活跃的engagement,除此之外还有区别吗?

2023-06-22 17:17 1 · 回答