开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

郝王爷 · 2023年05月22日

deal by deal 不该是三个项目分别计算吗?为什么要打包计算

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201601050300001103

问题如下:

3. For the projects described in Exhibit 1, under a deal-by-deal method with a clawback provision and true-up every three years, the cumulative dollar amount the GP receives by the end of the three years is equal to:

选项:

A.

one million.

B.

two million.

C.

three million.

解释:

B is correct.

On a cumulative basis for three years, the fund earns $10 million, of which $2 million goes to the GP. The $2 million earned by the GP corresponds to 20 percent of the difference between total three-year proceeds and three-year invested capital, or 0.2[(25 + 35 + 65) - (20 + 45 + 50)].

考点:私募股权基金绩效分配

解析:这三个项目在投资三年之后实现退出,三个项目初始投资是(20 + 45 + 50)=115,投资三年之后退出的价值为(25 + 35 + 65)=125,总共增值$10,因为没有hurdle rate,那么LP需要给GP支付 = $10*20%=$0.2 million

deal by deal 不该是三个项目分别计算吗?为什么要打包计算

1 个答案

Lucky_品职助教 · 2023年05月24日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


这里虽然是deal-by-deal method, 但是有clawback provision,并且是三年累计结算一次(true-up every three years,所以首先计算三年累计的收益是多少,得出gain=10m, 再乘以20%,得到2m。如果题目没有加clawback provision和三年累计结算期,那么是first project 盈利5m,third project盈利15m,累计能获得20%*20m=4m, 但是2nd项目亏损了10m,GP没有拿到carried interest 但也并没有因此承担损失,对LP来说是不利的。所以一般deal-by-deal method都会再附加clawback provision.

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!