开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

郑湛桦 · 2023年01月13日

觉得答案C有问题,老师说过ESG factor 和单个公司胡财务表现是正相关

NO.PZ2022120703000073

问题如下:

The ESG rating correlation among different data providers is most likely:

选项:

A.negatively correlated. B.uncorrelated. C.positively correlated.

解释:

C is correct because "one challenge is that the agreement or correlation between the various ratings agencies is low. A study by Chatterji at al. finds an approximate 0.3 correlation. (Or more technically, this analysis found pairwise tetrachoric correlations for three years among the six raters, with a mean correlation of 0.30 (about 2 standard deviations). However, this also included some negative ones’ correlations, meaning what one rater found responsible another found ‘irresponsible’.) A 2019 study by Gibson et al. shows a range of correlations (see Table 7.4). Yet another study by Berg et al. shows a range of correlations as well: Berg looks at a dataset of ESG ratings from six different raters – namely, KLD (MSCI Stats), Sustainalytics, Vigeo Eiris (Moody’s), RobecoSAM (S&P Global), Asset4 (Refinitiv) and MSCI – the correlations between the ratings are on average 0.54 and range from 0.38 to 0.71." Table 7.4 presents 4 categories of correlations ranging from 0.2 to 0.46.

A is incorrect because the academic study results and Table 7.4 demonstrate that the correlation is positively correlated.

B is incorrect because the academic study results and Table 7.4 demonstrate that the correlation is positively correlated.



1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2023年01月18日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


C选项的结论是教材中的一句原话,知识点的背景是在评判哪个ESG因素对企业具有重大性,例如现在新冠病毒对企业的影响是具有重大性的,但是未来这个因素可能会发生变化,不再具有重大性。因此很难评估一个确定的ESG因素的企业的影响程度,这个因素给企业带来的影响随着时间变化而变化。

同学理解的考虑ESG因素对投资有正向影响是站在投资角度,投资时,在分析和考量单一证券时整合ESG对投资表现会有正向作用,尤其是长期投资,这里整合ESG是更全面的考虑企业各方面的表现。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 460

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022120703000073问题如下 The ESG rating correlation among fferent ta provirs is most likely: A.negatively correlateB.uncorrelateC.positively correlate C is correbecause \"one challenge is ththe agreement or correlation between the various ratings agencies is low. A stu Chatterji al. fin approximate 0.3 correlation. (Or more technically, this analysis founpairwise tetrachoric correlations for three years among the six raters, with a mecorrelation of 0.30 (about 2 stanrviations). However, this also inclusome negative ones’ correlations, meaning whone rater founresponsible another foun‘irresponsible’.) A 2019 stu Gibson et al. shows a range of correlations (see Table 7.4). Yet another stu Berg et al. shows a range of correlations well: Berg looks a taset of ESG ratings from six fferent raters – namely, KL(MSStats), Sustainalytics, Vigeo Eiris (Moo’s), RobecoS(S P Global), Asset4 (Refinitiv) anMS– the correlations between the ratings are on average 0.54 anrange from 0.38 to 0.71.\" Table 7.4 presents 4 categories of correlations ranging from 0.2 to 0.46.A is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlateB is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlate 请列举考纲中全部的相关性问题,正负不可比

2024-05-21 17:55 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000073 问题如下 The ESG rating correlation among fferent ta provirs is most likely: A.negatively correlate B.uncorrelate C.positively correlate C is correbecause \"one challenge is ththe agreement or correlation between the various ratings agencies is low. A stu Chatterji al. fin approximate 0.3 correlation. (Or more technically, this analysis founpairwise tetrachoric correlations for three years among the six raters, with a mecorrelation of 0.30 (about 2 stanrviations). However, this also inclusome negative ones’ correlations, meaning whone rater founresponsible another foun‘irresponsible’.) A 2019 stu Gibson et al. shows a range of correlations (see Table 7.4). Yet another stu Berg et al. shows a range of correlations well: Berg looks a taset of ESG ratings from six fferent raters – namely, KL(MSStats), Sustainalytics, Vigeo Eiris (Moo’s), RobecoS(S P Global), Asset4 (Refinitiv) anMS– the correlations between the ratings are on average 0.54 anrange from 0.38 to 0.71.\" Table 7.4 presents 4 categories of correlations ranging from 0.2 to 0.46.A is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlateB is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlate 这个是评级机构之间的评级相关性低,但是评级机构的评级和数据提供者之间的相关性是弱的正相关关系,对吗?

2024-05-19 18:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000073 问题如下 The ESG rating correlation among fferent ta provirs is most likely: A.negatively correlate B.uncorrelate C.positively correlate C is correbecause \"one challenge is ththe agreement or correlation between the various ratings agencies is low. A stu Chatterji al. fin approximate 0.3 correlation. (Or more technically, this analysis founpairwise tetrachoric correlations for three years among the six raters, with a mecorrelation of 0.30 (about 2 stanrviations). However, this also inclusome negative ones’ correlations, meaning whone rater founresponsible another foun‘irresponsible’.) A 2019 stu Gibson et al. shows a range of correlations (see Table 7.4). Yet another stu Berg et al. shows a range of correlations well: Berg looks a taset of ESG ratings from six fferent raters – namely, KL(MSStats), Sustainalytics, Vigeo Eiris (Moo’s), RobecoS(S P Global), Asset4 (Refinitiv) anMS– the correlations between the ratings are on average 0.54 anrange from 0.38 to 0.71.\" Table 7.4 presents 4 categories of correlations ranging from 0.2 to 0.46.A is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlateB is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlate 教材里说各个数据供应商的数字不相关,现在怎么又相关了?!品职你们在放题目的时候能不能动动你们的猪脑子啊

2024-05-09 00:22 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000073 问题如下 The ESG rating correlation among fferent ta provirs is most likely: A.negatively correlate B.uncorrelate C.positively correlate C is correbecause \"one challenge is ththe agreement or correlation between the various ratings agencies is low. A stu Chatterji al. fin approximate 0.3 correlation. (Or more technically, this analysis founpairwise tetrachoric correlations for three years among the six raters, with a mecorrelation of 0.30 (about 2 stanrviations). However, this also inclusome negative ones’ correlations, meaning whone rater founresponsible another foun‘irresponsible’.) A 2019 stu Gibson et al. shows a range of correlations (see Table 7.4). Yet another stu Berg et al. shows a range of correlations well: Berg looks a taset of ESG ratings from six fferent raters – namely, KL(MSStats), Sustainalytics, Vigeo Eiris (Moo’s), RobecoS(S P Global), Asset4 (Refinitiv) anMS– the correlations between the ratings are on average 0.54 anrange from 0.38 to 0.71.\" Table 7.4 presents 4 categories of correlations ranging from 0.2 to 0.46.A is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlateB is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlate 教材里经常说各个机构的标准不统一,怎么现在不同的机构评级提供者的结果又正相关了?

2024-04-16 17:20 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120703000073 问题如下 The ESG rating correlation among fferent ta provirs is most likely: A.negatively correlate B.uncorrelate C.positively correlate C is correbecause \"one challenge is ththe agreement or correlation between the various ratings agencies is low. A stu Chatterji al. fin approximate 0.3 correlation. (Or more technically, this analysis founpairwise tetrachoric correlations for three years among the six raters, with a mecorrelation of 0.30 (about 2 stanrviations). However, this also inclusome negative ones’ correlations, meaning whone rater founresponsible another foun‘irresponsible’.) A 2019 stu Gibson et al. shows a range of correlations (see Table 7.4). Yet another stu Berg et al. shows a range of correlations well: Berg looks a taset of ESG ratings from six fferent raters – namely, KL(MSStats), Sustainalytics, Vigeo Eiris (Moo’s), RobecoS(S P Global), Asset4 (Refinitiv) anMS– the correlations between the ratings are on average 0.54 anrange from 0.38 to 0.71.\" Table 7.4 presents 4 categories of correlations ranging from 0.2 to 0.46.A is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlateB is incorrebecause the acamic stu results anTable 7.4 monstrate ththe correlation is positively correlate 跟老师确认一下,看了其他回复,B错的地方是在于,不同ta provirs存在相关性,但很低,不是不存在相关性是吗?

2024-03-05 01:21 1 · 回答