开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

凉茶325 · 2022年12月25日

为什么不选择bOnd 呀?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201805280100000101

问题如下:

1.The change in the annual spending rate, in conjunction with the board’s expectations regarding future enrollment and the need for endowment support, could justify that KUE’s target weight for:

选项:

A.

infrastructure be increased.

B.

investment- grade bonds be increased.

C.

private real estate equity be decreased.

解释:

A is correct.

A lower annual spending rate, in addition to the board’s expectations of rising enrollment and minimal need for endowment support over the next five years, indicates a decreased need for liquidity. Therefore, KUE could justify an increase in the strategic allocation to less liquid asset classes (such as private real estate equity and infrastructure) and a decrease in the strategic allocation to liquid assets (such as investment- grade bonds).

考点:revisiting the SAA

解析:每年支出比率减少,学费预期增加,因此KUE的流动性需求下降,因此可以增加投资期长、流动性比较差的资产。A选项中的infrastructure以及C选项中的private real estate是illiquid asset,投资权重应当增加,B选项中的investment- grade bonds流动性较强,投资权重应当减少。所以权重增减的判断正确的是A。

他不是不要那么多流动性吗,那就Bond equity都可以呀?

1 个答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2022年12月26日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


同学分析的是对的,A选项的infrastructure以及C选项中的private real estate是illiquid asset,投资权重应当增加,B选项的bond流动性强,可以减少权重,按照调整方向,A是对的。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 207

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201805280100000101 问题如下 1.The change in the annuspenng rate, in conjunction with the boars expectations regarng future enrollment anthe neefor enwment support, couljustify thKUE’s target weight for: A.infrastructure increase B.investment- gra bon increase C.private reestate equity crease A is correct. A lower annuspenng rate, in aition to the boars expectations of rising enrollment anminimneefor enwment support over the next five years, incates a creaseneefor liquity. Therefore, KUE couljustify increase in the strategic allocation to less liquiasset classes (suprivate reestate equity aninfrastructure) ana crease in the strategic allocation to liquiassets (suinvestment- gra bon).考点revisiting the SAA解析每年支出比率减少,学费预期增加,因此KUE的流动性需求下降,因此可以增加投资期长、流动性比较差的资产。A中的infrastructure以及C中的private reestate是illiquiasset,投资权重应当增加,B中的investment- gra bon流动性较强,投资权重应当减少。所以权重增减的判断正确的是 每年支出比率减少,学费预期增加,那不是之后可以投更稳定的资产以降低风险吗?比如投investment- gra bon。private reestate属于alternative风险更高。学校每年支出在减少,投资收益能超过支出就可以,所以之后可以投的更稳。这个角度理解为何不对?

2023-02-15 14:06 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000101 问题如下 1.The change in the annuspenng rate, in conjunction with the boars expectations regarng future enrollment anthe neefor enwment support, couljustify thKUE’s target weight for: A.infrastructure increase B.investment- gra bon increase C.private reestate equity crease A is correct. A lower annuspenng rate, in aition to the boars expectations of rising enrollment anminimneefor enwment support over the next five years, incates a creaseneefor liquity. Therefore, KUE couljustify increase in the strategic allocation to less liquiasset classes (suprivate reestate equity aninfrastructure) ana crease in the strategic allocation to liquiassets (suinvestment- gra bon).考点revisiting the SAA解析每年支出比率减少,学费预期增加,因此KUE的流动性需求下降,因此可以增加投资期长、流动性比较差的资产。A中的infrastructure以及C中的private reestate是illiquiasset,投资权重应当增加,B中的investment- gra bon流动性较强,投资权重应当减少。所以权重增减的判断正确的是 老师请问,这里的投资infrastructure是指学校的基础建设吗?这种会有投资收益的吗?

2022-12-29 14:18 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201805280100000101 根据Ehxibit 1, investment gra bon比例由现在的%增加到了target的20%,难道不是增加了bon?

2021-06-10 19:18 1 · 回答

请问一下老师,Infrastructure的expecteexcess return 是小于零的,为什么投资的比例还要上升呢?谢谢老师

2020-10-15 11:45 1 · 回答