开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

开泰-王飞 · 2022年12月22日

a为何不对

  1. CFA III
  2. Behavioral Finance

* 问题详情，请 查看题干

NO.PZ201511190100000302

问题如下：

Which of Tang’s observations is least likely to be the consequence of Jordan demonstrating loss-aversion bias?

选项：

A.

Observation 1.

B.

Observation 2.

C.

Observation 3.

解释：

C is correct.

Loss aversion by itself may cause a sector concentration; however, a market neutral strategy tends to focus on individual stocks without regard to the sector. The sector exposure would be mitigated with the balancing of the individual long and short positions.

高风险，持有时间很长，underwater不都是loss aversion的表现吗？

添加评论
3 个答案

王琛_品职助教 · 2023年01月10日

嗨，从没放弃的小努力你好：


这个偏差也可以是造成集中持股的原因，好像c也不对

关于选项 C 的详细分析及备考建议，我之前刚好总结过，请同学先参考一下：https://class.pzacademy.com/qa/88186

如果同学还有疑问，可以追问或者评论，我再回答同学的后续疑问哈

----------------------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！

开泰-王飞 · 2023年01月10日

这个偏差也可以是造成集中持股的原因，好像c也不对

王琛_品职助教 · 2022年12月23日

嗨，努力学习的PZer你好：


是的，同学的分析是正确的

但是题干问的是：Tang 的哪个观察，最「不」可能 least likely 是 Jordan 呈现出 loss-aversion bias 的结果？

选项 A，即观察一，正如同学的分析，可以体现出 Jordan 有 loss-aversion bias，所以不选哈

做题一定要注意是 most likely 还是 least likely

----------------------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！

  • 3

    回答

  • 0

    关注

  • 462

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201511190100000302 问题如下 Whiof Tang’s observations is least likely to the consequenof Jorn monstrating loss-aversion bias? A.Observation 1. B.Observation 2. C.Observation 3. C is correct.Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. Observation 2: The trang volume of the funhcreasemore th40 percent ring the past year.Observation 3: The portfolio is more concentratein a few sectors thin the past.他loss aversion 就将亏损的股票全部持有，好的股票都卖了，trang volume为什么会下降啊？不是应该不变或者上升吗？C亏的都留着在，那就是可能集中在某些行业，因为行业风险的原因一亏都亏，所以更集中C应该是对的的呀 B是错的呀，求解

2022-11-29 13:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 问题如下 Whiof Tang’s observations is least likely to the consequenof Jorn monstrating loss-aversion bias? A.Observation 1. B.Observation 2. C.Observation 3. C is correct.Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. loss-aversion会增加交易量，说交易量会下降，所以不对啊。为什么答案关注点在于long/short策略

2022-07-04 11:59 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 Observation 2. Observation 3. C is correct. Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. 如果一直存有亏损的头寸也会导致头寸集中吧

2022-03-22 16:52 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000302 Observation 2. Observation 3. C is correct. Loss aversion itself mcause a sector concentration; however, a market neutrstrategy ten to focus on invistocks without regarto the sector. The sector exposure woulmitigatewith the balancing of the invilong anshort positions. position unr water 是指现在的持仓太少了么

2022-02-15 10:46 1 · 回答