开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

赵文卿 · 2022年12月07日

d选项没看懂什么意思

NO.PZ2022071601000013

问题如下:

Why was the US Department of Labor’s clarification of fiduciary duty in 2015 welcomed by the ESG investing industry?

选项:

A.It allowed plans to invest in generating societal benefits in addition to financial return, as long as they were deemed appropriate for the plan’s investment objectives, return and risk

B.It provided a standard for economically targeted investments (ETIs)

C.It specified that, as long as the expected rate of return was commensurate with the rates of return offered by alternative investments with similar risk characteristics, ETIs were compatible with fiduciary duty

D.It incentivised pension funds subject to ERISA to invest in ETIs

解释:

A选项说在选择投资产品的时候,除了财务return也可以考虑投资一些会带来社会benefits的标的,只要他们能够匹配客户的投资目标,收益和风险特征。这个说法正确。

B选项说,US Department of Labor’s clarification of fiduciary duty提供了一个以赚钱为目标的投资标准,这个和ESG投资不相符。

C选项是说的是只要能满足预期收益和风险的匹配,ETIs就是满足受托责任的。这是克林顿时期的。

D选项是说,它鼓励更多Pension funds投资在以赚钱为目标的投资当中,这个并没有考虑到ESG,并不相符。

d选项没看懂什么意思

1 个答案

净净_品职助教 · 2022年12月08日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


ETI指的是economically targeted investment。2015年是奥巴马执政时期,美国劳工部是支持ESG的。D选项鼓励养老金做ETI的投资,没有提到要关注ESG,因此错误。不太记得美国DOL这个法案的话可以回顾一下课程Policymakers and Regulators (2),课程里也有讲到这道题。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 565

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022071601000013问题如下 Why wthe US partment of Labor’s clarification of ficiary ty in 2015 welcomethe ESG investing instry?A.It alloweplans to invest in generating societbenefits in aition to financireturn, long they were emeappropriate for the plan’s investment objectives, return anriskB.It provia stanrfor economically targeteinvestments (ETIs)C.It specifiethat, long the expecterate of return wcommensurate with the rates of return offerealternative investments with similrisk characteristics, ETIs were compatible with ficiary tyIt incentivisepension fun subjeto ERISA to invest in ETIs A说在选择投资产品的时候,除了财务return也可以考虑投资一些会带来社会benefits的标的,只要他们能够匹配客户的投资目标,收益和风险特征。这个说法正确。B说,US partment of Labor’s clarification of ficiary ty提供了一个以赚钱为目标的投资标准,这个和ESG投资不相符。C是说的是只要能满足预期收益和风险的匹配,ETIs就是满足受托责任的。这是克林顿时期的。说,它鼓励更多Pension fun投资在以赚钱为目标的投资当中,这个并没有考虑到ESG,并不相符。 能否把这个题的背景和题意再详细一下。

2024-02-27 11:30 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022071601000013 问题如下 Why wthe US partment of Labor’s clarification of ficiary ty in 2015 welcomethe ESG investing instry? A.It alloweplans to invest in generating societbenefits in aition to financireturn, long they were emeappropriate for the plan’s investment objectives, return anrisk B.It provia stanrfor economically targeteinvestments (ETIs) C.It specifiethat, long the expecterate of return wcommensurate with the rates of return offerealternative investments with similrisk characteristics, ETIs were compatible with ficiary ty It incentivisepension fun subjeto ERISA to invest in ETIs A说在选择投资产品的时候,除了财务return也可以考虑投资一些会带来社会benefits的标的,只要他们能够匹配客户的投资目标,收益和风险特征。这个说法正确。B说,US partment of Labor’s clarification of ficiary ty提供了一个以赚钱为目标的投资标准,这个和ESG投资不相符。C是说的是只要能满足预期收益和风险的匹配,ETIs就是满足受托责任的。这是克林顿时期的。说,它鼓励更多Pension fun投资在以赚钱为目标的投资当中,这个并没有考虑到ESG,并不相符。 同题

2023-11-05 18:43 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022071601000013 问题如下 Why wthe US partment of Labor’s clarification of ficiary ty in 2015 welcomethe ESG investing instry? A.It alloweplans to invest in generating societbenefits in aition to financireturn, long they were emeappropriate for the plan’s investment objectives, return anrisk B.It provia stanrfor economically targeteinvestments (ETIs) C.It specifiethat, long the expecterate of return wcommensurate with the rates of return offerealternative investments with similrisk characteristics, ETIs were compatible with ficiary ty It incentivisepension fun subjeto ERISA to invest in ETIs A说在选择投资产品的时候,除了财务return也可以考虑投资一些会带来社会benefits的标的,只要他们能够匹配客户的投资目标,收益和风险特征。这个说法正确。B说,US partment of Labor’s clarification of ficiary ty提供了一个以赚钱为目标的投资标准,这个和ESG投资不相符。C是说的是只要能满足预期收益和风险的匹配,ETIs就是满足受托责任的。这是克林顿时期的。说,它鼓励更多Pension fun投资在以赚钱为目标的投资当中,这个并没有考虑到ESG,并不相符。 老师能下economically targeteinvestments (ETIs)不,感觉这块很混乱,又是克林顿,又是小布什和奥巴马的。感谢感谢

2023-06-19 16:00 5 · 回答