开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

椰子皮 · 2022年08月21日

liability-asset management?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201812020100000405

问题如下:

Which of Molly’s statements about liability-driven investing is (are) correct?

选项:

A.

Statement 1 only

B.

Statement 2 only.

C.

Both Statement 1 and Statement 2.

解释:

C is correct. Molly is correct that measurement error can arise even in immunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, which have set amounts and set dates. Also, a parallel shift in yield curves is a sufficient but not a necessary condition to achieve the desired outcome. Non-parallel shifts as well as twists in the yield curve can change the cash flow yield on the immunizing portfolio; however, minimizing the dispersion of cash flows in the asset portfolio mitigates this risk. As a result, both statements are correct.

老师,前面一个题目不是说免疫策略是liability-asset management,不是liability-driven investing?为啥这个题干里说的是liability-asset management

2 个答案

pzqa015 · 2022年08月22日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


那是区分了ALM和LDI。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

pzqa015 · 2022年08月21日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


同时考虑资产与负债的投资策略是Asset-liability management策略,这是ALM是更大范畴的概念,对应的是Asset-only只考虑资产的投资策略。

在Asset-liability management的策略下,又可以分为Asset-driven liabilities,与Liability-driven investing;其区别是:已知是资产还是负债。Asset-driven liabilities是资产已知,找到合适的负债匹配,如融资租赁,租赁合同是其资产;Liability-driven investing是负债已知找到合适的资产匹配,如养老金。

本题属于比较细微的知识点区分,专门考到的这个区别。但是在其他题目中,并不强调是Asset-liability management中的哪种,所以经常会碰到Asset-liability management与Liability-driven investing混用的情况(在CFA中不考虑Asset-driven liability的情况)。


----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

椰子皮 · 2022年08月21日

老师,那怎么理解这个case的另一个小问,说免疫策略属于ALM,不属于liability driven

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 479

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201812020100000405问题如下 Whiof Molly’s statements about liability-iven investing is (are)correct? Statement 1 only Statement 2 only.Both Statement 1 and Statement 2. Cis correct. Molly is correthmeasurement error carise even inimmunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, whihave set amounts ansettes. Also, a parallel shift in yielcurves is a sufficient but not anecessary contion to achieve the sireoutcome. Non-parallel shifts welltwists in the yielcurve cchange the cash flow yielon the immunizingportfolio; however, minimizing the spersion of cash flows in the assetportfolio mitigates this risk. a result, both statements are correct. 答案没有cash flow matching 的问题?

2023-12-18 10:47 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201812020100000405问题如下 Whiof Molly’s statements about liability-iven investing is (are)correct? Statement 1 only Statement 2 only.Both Statement 1 and Statement 2. Cis correct. Molly is correthmeasurement error carise even inimmunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, whihave set amounts ansettes. Also, a parallel shift in yielcurves is a sufficient but not anecessary contion to achieve the sireoutcome. Non-parallel shifts welltwists in the yielcurve cchange the cash flow yielon the immunizingportfolio; however, minimizing the spersion of cash flows in the assetportfolio mitigates this risk. a result, both statements are correct. 老师 ration matching不假设收益率曲线不发生改变吗

2023-11-25 08:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201812020100000405问题如下 Whiof Molly’s statements about liability-iven investing is (are)correct? Statement 1 only Statement 2 only.Both Statement 1 and Statement 2. Cis correct. Molly is correthmeasurement error carise even inimmunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, whihave set amounts ansettes. Also, a parallel shift in yielcurves is a sufficient but not anecessary contion to achieve the sireoutcome. Non-parallel shifts welltwists in the yielcurve cchange the cash flow yielon the immunizingportfolio; however, minimizing the spersion of cash flows in the assetportfolio mitigates this risk. a result, both statements are correct. statement 1 是对的,是因为他说了一种场景吧,比如说用ration matching,parameters就有影响,cashflow没有影响。如果改成will aersely affethe bonportfolios 还对么?

2023-08-06 12:56 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201812020100000405 问题如下 SRCapit(SR), a globasset management company, specializes in ­fixeincomeinvestments. Molly, chief investment officer, is meeting with a prospectiveclient, Leof Puy FinanciCompany (C). Leahinforms Molly thC’s previous ­fixeincome manager focuseon the interestrate sensitivities of assets anliabilities when making asset allocationcisions. Molly explains that, in contrast, SR’s investment process ­firstanalyzes the size antiming of client liabilities, anthen it buil assetportfolio baseon the interest rate sensitivity of those liabilities. Mollynotes thSR generally uses actively manageportfolios signeto earna return in excess of the benchmark portfolio. For clients interesteinpassive exposure to ­fixeincome instruments, SR offers two aitionalapproaches.Approa1: Seeks to fully replicate a small range of benchmarks consisting of government bon.Approa2: Follows enhanceinxing process for a subset of the bon incluin the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate BonInx. Approa2 malso customizeto refleclient preferences.Toillustrate SR’s immunization approafor controlling portfolio interestrate risk, Molly scusses a hypotheticportfolio composeof two non-callable,investment-gra bon. The portfolio ha weighteaverage yiel to-maturityof 9.55%, a weighteaverage coupon rate of 10.25%, ana cash flow yielof9.85%.Leahinforms Molly thC ha single $500 million liability e in nineyears, anshe wants SR to construa bonportfolio thearns a rateof return sufficient to poff the obligation. Leexpresses concern aboutthe risks associatewith immunization strategy for this obligation. Inresponse, Molly makes the following statements about liability-iveninvesting:Statement 1: Although the amount ante of SR’s liability is known with certainty, measurement errors associatewith key parameters relative to interest rate changes maersely affethe bonportfolios.Statement 2: A cash flow matching strategy will mitigate the risk from non-parallel shifts in the yielcurve.Mollyprovis the four US llar–nominatebonportfolios in Exhibit 1 forconsiration. Molly explains ththe portfolios consist of non-callable,investment-gra corporate angovernment bon of various maturities becausezero-coupon bon are unavailable.The scussion turns to benchmarkselection. C’s previous fixeincome manager usea custom benchmark with thefollowing characteristics:Characteristic 1: The benchmark portfolio invests only in investment-gra bon of US corporations with a minimum issuansize of $250 million.Characteristic 2: Valuation occurs on a weekly basis, because many of the bon in the inx are valueweekly.Characteristic 3: Historicprices anportfolio turnover are available for review.Mollyexplains that, in orr to evaluate the asset allocation process, fixeincomeportfolios shoulhave appropriate benchmark. Leasks for benchmark aiceregarng C’s portfolio of short-term anintermeate-term bon, allnominatein US llars. Molly presents three possible benchmarks inExhibit 2. Whiof Molly’s statements about liability-iven investing is (are)correct? Statement 1 only Statement 2 only. Both Statement 1 and Statement 2. Cis correct. Molly is correthmeasurement error carise even inimmunization strategies for Type 1 cash flows, whihave set amounts ansettes. Also, a parallel shift in yielcurves is a sufficient but not anecessary contion to achieve the sireoutcome. Non-parallel shifts welltwists in the yielcurve cchange the cash flow yielon the immunizingportfolio; however, minimizing the spersion of cash flows in the assetportfolio mitigates this risk. a result, both statements are correct. statement 1 中的 measurement errors指的是什么呢

2022-10-26 16:47 1 · 回答