开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

郎布斯吃苹果 · 2022年08月08日

35.26 – 22.67%是不是减反了?bm不应该是减数么,22.67%-35.26%才对?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201909300100000305

问题如下:

5 Based on Exhibit 2, the allocation effect for South America is closest to:

选项:

A.

-0.04%

B.

0.03%

C.

0.20%

解释:

C is correct.

The allocation effect for South America is 0.20%.
Allocation = (wiWi)(BiB) = (20.38% – 18.82%)(35.26 – 22.67%) = 0.1964% = 0.20%

如题

1 个答案

吴昊_品职助教 · 2022年08月08日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


没有反哦,公式中就是Bi-B,Bi是单独某一个的收益(对应35.26%),B是total benchmark收益(22.67%)。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 413

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201909300100000305 问题如下 5 Baseon Exhibit 2, the allocation effefor South Ameriis closest to: A.-0.04% B.0.03% C.0.20% C is correct. The allocation effefor South Ameriis 0.20%.Allocation = (wi – Wi)(– = (20.38% – 18.82%)(35.26 – 22.67%) = 0.1964% = 0.20% Macro的公式是(Rbi-Rb),Micro的公式是(Rb-0),题干不是已经说了用Micro算得么?为什么答案还是(Rbi-Rb)呢?单纯是因为没有Micro那个公式的么?

2024-05-28 20:27 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201909300100000305 问题如下 5 Baseon Exhibit 2, the allocation effefor South Ameriis closest to: A.-0.04% B.0.03% C.0.20% C is correct. The allocation effefor South Ameriis 0.20%.Allocation = (wi – Wi)(– = (20.38% – 18.82%)(35.26 – 22.67%) = 0.1964% = 0.20% 为什么这个allocation公式不行??

2024-05-13 22:53 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201909300100000305 问题如下 5 Baseon Exhibit 2, the allocation effefor South Ameriis closest to: A.-0.04% B.0.03% C.0.20% C is correct. The allocation effefor South Ameriis 0.20%.Allocation = (wi – Wi)(– = (20.38% – 18.82%)(35.26 – 22.67%) = 0.1964% = 0.20% 如题

2022-05-15 18:33 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201909300100000305问题如下5 Baseon Exhibit 2, the allocation effefor South Ameriis closest to: A.-0.04% B.0.03% C.0.20% C is correct. The allocation effefor South Ameriis 0.20%.Allocation = (wi – Wi)(– = (20.38% – 18.82%)(35.26 – 22.67%) = 0.1964% = 0.20%为什么用35·26?表里显示的也是benchmark return 啊,为什么当成Rp来用

2022-04-20 15:22 1 · 回答