开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

石头鱼170 · 2018年04月02日

请教三级衍生品题目,考点为interest rate call/put option

老师,首先请问一下,在这个考点的例题中,课件82及课件83页,分别是公司买call 及银行买put。前者购买成本要在获得的实际贷款中抵扣,到手的贷款变少,后者购买的成本在贷出的贷款中增加,实际贷出增加。现在有这么一个题,研究对象是公司firm(Texmaco),不是bank,使用的是collar,问有效利率:Mink is concerned about an upcoming reset on a floating-rate loan Casford Bank made to Texmaco. Exhibit 1 provides details on the loan and other relevant information.

EXHIBIT 1

TEXMACO LOAN INFORMATION

Face value$60 million
Loan due dateOne year from now
Rate180-day Libor + 200 bps
Reset frequencyEvery six months
Next reset30 Jun
Current spot 180-day Libor5%

 information on European-style interest rate option contracts that could be used to hedge the Texmaco loan. 

EXHIBIT 2

INFORMATION ON INTEREST RATE OPTIONS

Notional amount$60 million
Underlying180-day spot Libor
Day count convention30/360
Call exercise rate6.00%
Call premium$100,000
Put exercise rate4.50%
Put premium$130,000
Exercise date for both put and call30 Jun

Mink evaluates a put hedging strategy and a collar hedging strategy. He also examines methods to lower the cost of the collar.

Q. Given a 180-day spot Libor of 6.0% on the 30 June reset date, what is the effective interest rate at the reset of the Texmaco loan under the assumption of a collar constructed from the loan and the options described in Exhibit 2?   A.8.39%  B.8.28%  C.8.16%

C is correct. The effective cost of the collar purchased on 1 January for 30 June expiration = ($130,000 − $100,000)[1 + (0.05 + 0.02)(180/360)] = $31,050.

Effectivetotalamountofloan = $60,031,050
Putpayoff = $60,000,000[max(0,0.04500.0600)](180/360)=0
Callpayoff = $60,000,000[max(0,0.06000.0600)](180/360)=0
Interestonloan = $60,000,000[0.06+0.02](180/360)
$2,400,000
 
Effectiverate = [(60,000,000+$2,400,000)/($60,031,050)]365/1801
 = 8.16%

我的疑问是:

1.对于31050应该加在60mil还是减在60mil?我认为对于公司来说,collar是+p-c这个组合,成本分别是130000与100000,那么买p卖c,实际轧差成本(付出)是31050(已考虑利率),所以到手变少,应该在60mil扣减。为什么正确答案是加呢?2.关于collar的pay off,假设第二阶段开始libor是8%,那么p不执行,C执行。由于是collar在short call,那么执行的c实际是增加了贷款成本,而不是课件82页案例中买call的抵扣公司的贷款成本吧?等式右边计算实际利率的时候,应该是加上call的pay off吧?为什么解答中是负号呢?
2 个答案
已采纳答案

竹子 · 2018年04月02日

从这一题的答案和题干中的“Mink evaluates a put hedging strategy”,感觉mink是担心利率下跌,所以long put,然后为了减少Hedge成本,才short call的,如果是这样,应该是站在bank的角度,这样也与净成本= long put 成本-short call的期权费相符,也能说明为什么是加在60 million上了。

如果你认为这一题是站在公司的角度而不是bank的角度,那有一句话就是矛盾的,就是long put short call。因为对公司来说,应该是担心利率上涨,即long call, 同时为了减少hedge成本,应该是short put,而不是long put,short call。



石头鱼170 · 2018年04月03日

我好像明白了,两个问题的错误均在于角度错了,应该是银行的角度,这样都说得通了对吧?

竹子 · 2018年04月03日

对,这一题应该是银行的角度

  • 2

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 407

    浏览
相关问题