问题如下：
Which of the following statements comparing the Ho–Lee and Kalotay–Williams–Fabozzi (KWF) equilibrium term structure models is correct?
选项：
A. The Ho–Lee model assumes constant volatility, while the KWF model does not.
B. The KWF model incorporates the possibility of negative rates, while the Ho–Lee model does not.
C. The KWF model describes the log of the dynamics of the short rate, while the Ho–Lee model does not.
解释：
C is correct. The Kalotay–Williams–Fabozzi equilibrium term structure model is similar to the Ho–Lee model in that it assumes constant drift, no mean reversion, and constant volatility, but the KWF model describes the log of the dynamics of the short rate, while the Ho–Lee model does not.
这个题目没太明白。怎么能体现出来两者长短期的差异。不是因为是log的原因一个考虑了可能存在负数就避免了，一个没考虑吗
