开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Ethan · 2022年06月25日

这题是否可以答是overconfidence?

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201511190100000205

问题如下:

Indicate which bias is illustrated by Gerber’s focus on the achievement of a 52-week high of CHF 80. Discuss how Gerber could have mitigated its impact.

选项:

解释:

Gerber demonstrated anchoring bias by placing high hope in ABC stock reaching a new 52-week high of CHF 80. Anchoring is an information-processing bias which influences the way people estimate probabilities. When required to estimate a value with unknown magnitude, people generally begin by envisioning some initial default number—an “anchor”—which they then adjust up or down to reflect subsequent information and analysis. Despite setbacks and new information, Gerber did not adjust his view of CHF 80, but continued to cling to this anchor or belief even after reviewing the chief scientist’s report. He perceived new information through a warped lens; thus, the decision making deviated from rational reasoning.

To overcome anchoring bias, Gerber should consciously ask questions that may reveal an anchoring and adjustment bias: “Am I holding on to this stock based on rational analysis, or am I trying to attain a price that I am anchored to, such as the purchase price or a high water mark?” He should look at the basis for his decision to hold ABC to determine if it is anchored to a price target (a new 52-week high) or based on an objective, rational view of the company’s fundamentals. Gerber should have periodically reviewed his decision making process to determine if his analysis of ABC’s prospects was appropriate, focusing more on the company’s fundamentals rather than the price target.

答案说anchoring我可以理解,他锚定的还是能通过实验,股价看涨。但是是否也是过度自信?第一,他一直相信能通过实验;第二,他认为通过了就能创一年新高。

1 个答案
已采纳答案

王琛_品职助教 · 2022年06月27日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


1

anchoring 比 overconfidence 更符合题意

题目问的是 “Indicate which bias is illustrated by Gerber’s focus on the achievement of a 52-week high of CHF 80”

重点在 Gerber 专注于 CHF80 这个数字表现出了哪个 bias

而同学的分析,似乎并没有体现出因对 CHF80 这个数字的关注而体现的偏差

2

anchoring 强调一个初始值锚定数字, 而不根据新信息作出调整。锚定数字都在题干中给出了,所以 anchoring 比 overconfidence 更适合

3

另外,也可以从题干的 mitigate 这个词判断

可以被 mitigate 的是 cognitive error,比如 Anchoring

而对于 overconfidence,属于 emotional bias,是很难消除的,所以通常 adapt 这样的词

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 506

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201511190100000205问题如下Incate whibiis illustrateGerber’s focus on the achievement of a 52-week high of CHF 80. scuss how Gerber coulhave mitigateits impact. Gerber monstrateanchoring biplacing high hope in Astoreaching a new 52-week high of CHF 80. Anchoring is information-processing biwhiinfluences the wpeople estimate probabilities. When requireto estimate a value with unknown magnitu, people generally begin envisioning some initifault number—“anchor”—whithey then aust up or wn to reflesubsequent information ananalysis. spite setbacks annew information, Gerber not aust his view of CHF 80, but continueto cling to this anchor or belief even after reviewing the chief scientist’s report. He perceivenew information through a warpelens; thus, the cision making viatefrom rationreasoning.To overcome anchoring bias, Gerber shoulconsciously ask questions thmreveanchoring anaustment bias: “I holng on to this stobaseon rationanalysis, or I trying to attain a prithI anchoreto, suthe purchase prior a high water mark?” He shoullook the basis for his cision to holAto termine if it is anchoreto a pritarget (a new 52-week high) or baseon objective, rationview of the company’s funmentals. Gerber shoulhave periocally reviewehis cision making process to termine if his analysis of ABC’s prospects wappropriate, focusing more on the company’s funmentals rather ththe pritarget.这类问题能否统一用ask question来回答,因为讲义上很多消除的方法都有ask question.

2023-08-30 10:43 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000205 问题如下 Incate whibiis illustrateGerber’s focus on the achievement of a 52-week high of CHF 80. scuss how Gerber coulhave mitigateits impact. Gerber monstrateanchoring biplacing high hope in Astoreaching a new 52-week high of CHF 80. Anchoring is information-processing biwhiinfluences the wpeople estimate probabilities. When requireto estimate a value with unknown magnitu, people generally begin envisioning some initifault number—“anchor”—whithey then aust up or wn to reflesubsequent information ananalysis. spite setbacks annew information, Gerber not aust his view of CHF 80, but continueto cling to this anchor or belief even after reviewing the chief scientist’s report. He perceivenew information through a warpelens; thus, the cision making viatefrom rationreasoning.To overcome anchoring bias, Gerber shoulconsciously ask questions thmreveanchoring anaustment bias: “I holng on to this stobaseon rationanalysis, or I trying to attain a prithI anchoreto, suthe purchase prior a high water mark?” He shoullook the basis for his cision to holAto termine if it is anchoreto a pritarget (a new 52-week high) or baseon objective, rationview of the company’s funmentals. Gerber shoulhave periocally reviewehis cision making process to termine if his analysis of ABC’s prospects wappropriate, focusing more on the company’s funmentals rather ththe pritarget. 他一直在寻找积极的信息,可以说他也有confirmation bias吗?

2023-01-28 15:04 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000205 问题如下 Incate whibiis illustrateGerber’s focus on the achievement of a 52-week high of CHF 80. scuss how Gerber coulhave mitigateits impact. Gerber monstrateanchoring biplacing high hope in Astoreaching a new 52-week high of CHF 80. Anchoring is information-processing biwhiinfluences the wpeople estimate probabilities. When requireto estimate a value with unknown magnitu, people generally begin envisioning some initifault number—“anchor”—whithey then aust up or wn to reflesubsequent information ananalysis. spite setbacks annew information, Gerber not aust his view of CHF 80, but continueto cling to this anchor or belief even after reviewing the chief scientist’s report. He perceivenew information through a warpelens; thus, the cision making viatefrom rationreasoning.To overcome anchoring bias, Gerber shoulconsciously ask questions thmreveanchoring anaustment bias: “I holng on to this stobaseon rationanalysis, or I trying to attain a prithI anchoreto, suthe purchase prior a high water mark?” He shoullook the basis for his cision to holAto termine if it is anchoreto a pritarget (a new 52-week high) or baseon objective, rationview of the company’s funmentals. Gerber shoulhave periocally reviewehis cision making process to termine if his analysis of ABC’s prospects wappropriate, focusing more on the company’s funmentals rather ththe pritarget. 请问revert到某个长期水平是不是用gambler bias更为合适呢?谢谢!

2023-01-13 16:00 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201511190100000205 问题如下 Incate whibiis illustrateGerber’s focus on the achievement of a 52-week high of CHF 80. scuss how Gerber coulhave mitigateits impact. Gerber monstrateanchoring biplacing high hope in Astoreaching a new 52-week high of CHF 80. Anchoring is information-processing biwhiinfluences the wpeople estimate probabilities. When requireto estimate a value with unknown magnitu, people generally begin envisioning some initifault number—“anchor”—whithey then aust up or wn to reflesubsequent information ananalysis. spite setbacks annew information, Gerber not aust his view of CHF 80, but continueto cling to this anchor or belief even after reviewing the chief scientist’s report. He perceivenew information through a warpelens; thus, the cision making viatefrom rationreasoning.To overcome anchoring bias, Gerber shoulconsciously ask questions thmreveanchoring anaustment bias: “I holng on to this stobaseon rationanalysis, or I trying to attain a prithI anchoreto, suthe purchase prior a high water mark?” He shoullook the basis for his cision to holAto termine if it is anchoreto a pritarget (a new 52-week high) or baseon objective, rationview of the company’s funmentals. Gerber shoulhave periocally reviewehis cision making process to termine if his analysis of ABC’s prospects wappropriate, focusing more on the company’s funmentals rather ththe pritarget. 这种如何克服bias的措施需要掌握吗

2022-05-19 22:40 1 · 回答