开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

dingdangyu13 · 2018年01月07日

问一道题：NO.PZ201709270100000302 第2小题 [ CFA II ]

  1. CFA II
  2. Quantitative

* 问题详情，请 查看题干

问题如下图：

    

选项：

A.

B.

C.

解释：


这道题critical value是1.96  2.308>1.96应拒绝原假设呀，为什么看p-value，没法评判p-value是大还是小雅

添加评论
2 个答案

源_品职助教 · 2018年05月05日

准确地说.应该参考自由度为38，显著性水平为1%的双尾下的T值。

但是这题因为样本取值超过40，所以可以用正太分布1%下的双尾的Z值做近似代替。

一般相同分布相同显著性水平下，单位对应的关键值的绝对值是要小于双尾对应关键值的临界值。

所以如果检验统计量2.308小于2.33，那么自然也小于双尾下的临界值，所以不能拒绝原假设。

源_品职助教 · 2018年01月08日

你说所说的2.308是B2这个系数检验的统计量，但是对应1%的关键值是2.33不是1.96，所以不能拒绝原假设。因为这里P值大于1%，所以也是得的不能拒绝B2=0的原假设。


jeffrey19861001 · 2018年05月05日

查表是df=40-2=38；1%one tailed t-test取值吗？

  • 2

    回答

  • 3

    关注

  • 353

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201709270100000302 问题如下 2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 这里也有T值，我是否可以用T检验

2023-04-24 21:41 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201709270100000302 问题如下 2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 请问P-LEVEL 都是和1%来比较嘛，还是说因为题干里说了1%？

2023-04-11 17:27 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201709270100000302 2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 下次碰到这种题目的问法，也是直接比较即可么

2021-12-03 09:18 1 · 回答

2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 怎么判断 原假设和H谢谢

2020-07-15 17:06 1 · 回答

2. a significanlevel of 1%, whiof the following is the best interpretation of the regression coefficients with regarto explaining ROE? ESG is significant, but tenure is not. Tenure is significant, but ESG is not. Neither ESG nor tenure is significant. C is correct. The t-statistic for tenure is 2.308, incating significanthe 0.027 level but not the 0.01 level. The t-statistic for ESG is 1.201, with a p-value of 0.238, whimeans we fail to rejethe null hypothesis for ESG the 0.01 significanlevel. 老师好， 这里题目要看这两个东西是否是显著的 所以原假设是该两个变量不显著 Ha是该两个变量是显著的是吗? Ha 一般是题目研究的东西 对吗? 谢谢。

2020-07-15 16:21 1 · 回答