开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

和棋 · 2020年11月06日

问一道题:NO.PZ2016082405000050

问题如下:

Leverage, Inc., an investment bank, has numerous credit default swaps with XYZ Corp. Leverage has established a break clause with XYZ Corp. to reduce risk. The break clause is trigger-based and may be exercised once the trigger is satisfied. The CEO of Leverage is concerned about a banker's paradox. Which of the following statements best describe the CEO's concern?

选项:

A.

To be effective, the break clause option should not be used too early.

B.

The weak firm often recovers after the use of the break clause.

C.

The break clause option is used too early, and relations with the counterparty suffer.

D.

The break clause option is used too late, and the weak firm gets weaker.

解释:

C  A break clause (also called a liquidity put or early termination option) allows a party to terminate a transaction at specified future dates at its replacement value. Despite their advantages, break clauses have not been highly popular. One explanation is known as banker’s paradox, which implies that for a break clause to be truly useful, it should be exercised early on, prior to the substantial decline in a counterparty’s credit quality. Entities, however, typically avoid early exercise to preserve their good relationships with counterparties.

If you use it early for fear of your own loss, it implies your distrust of the credit quality of the counterparty, which will naturally damage the relationship between the two parties, namely banker's paradox.

D的话说如果执行太晚了,对手方会变得情况恶化,这样也会导致我们会有损失,为什么不是CEO关心的事情呢?

1 个答案

品职答疑小助手雍 · 2020年11月06日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


核心不是CEO关心不关心,而是那个悖论的定义。

banker's paradox是指,如果想充分利用break clause,就必须在对手方信用质量下降之前,提早使用,此时对手方信用质量还没有下降。如果为了怕自己损而提早使用,就暗示着自己对于对手方信用质量的不信任,这自然会损害双方之间的关系,即banker's paradox。


-------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!