开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Lulu1214 · 2020年08月11日

问一道题:NO.PZ2019122802000006

问题如下:

Which of the following statements about using a risk factor-based approach rather than a mean–variance-optimization technique is correct?
Statement 1 Risk factor-based approaches to asset allocation produce more robust asset allocation proposals.
Statement 2 A mean–variance optimization typically overallocates to the private alternative asset classes due to stale pricing.

选项:

A.

Only Statement 1

B.

Only Statement 2

C.

Both Statement 1 and Statement 2

解释:

C is correct.

Statement 1 is correct because risk factor-based approaches to asset allocation can be applied to develop more robust asset allocations. Statement 2 is correct because a mean–variance optimization typically overallocates to the private alternative asset classes, partly because of underestimated risk due to stale pricing and the assumption that returns are normally distributed.

stable prcing是评估产生的smooth数据的效果,导致低估volatility,从而over-allocate了 alts,是这么理解吗。

1 个答案

韩韩_品职助教 · 2020年08月12日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


同学你好,你的理解是对的。stale pricing 数据很少,价格滞后,那么数据是又smooth的效果,导致低估volatility, 从而over-allocate.


-------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!


  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 580

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019122802000006 问题如下 Whiof the following statements about using a risk factor-baseapproarather tha mean–variance-optimization technique is correct? Statement 1 Risk factor-baseapproaches to asset allocation promore robust asset allocation proposals. Statement 2 A mean–varianoptimization typically overallocates to the private alternative asset classes e to stale pricing. A.Only Statement 1 B.Only Statement 2 C.Both Statement 1 anStatement 2 C is correct.Statement 1 is correbecause risk factor-baseapproaches to asset allocation capplieto velop more robust asset allocations. Statement 2 is correbecause a mean–varianoptimization typically overallocates to the private alternative asset classes, partly because of unrestimaterisk e to stale pricing anthe assumption threturns are normally stributerisk factor approach在配置资产组合时整体会更灵活。还是举个栗子,比如我想模拟一个创业板指数的走势,但是这些指数里面有些个股可能很难买到(比如因为交易不活跃)。那这个时候用risk factor approach来代替,做一个类似这些很难买到的指数里的个股的risk factor 。(例如这个买不到指数里的个股是小股票c,受小市值因子影响很大,就做多一个小市值股票同时做空一个大市值的股票,模拟出c股票的类似走势,即使没有买c股票,但是想要的结果达到了,用的risk factor approach模拟的结果涨跌和c股票都差不多)这样就相对更灵活一些,不用买不到这个指数的个股干着急。stale pricing指的是报价不连续,导致价格更新的慢,样本少了,平滑了波动,所以方差小,而真实的波动会大很多,所以会低估风险,进而分配过多的资产在private alternative asset。所以选 老师,您好。不好意思,有点纠结。为什么这里特指 private 的alternative asset,因为MVO方法是会over allocate on alternatives,但这里特别指出是private,为什么也是正确的

2022-05-11 16:12 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019122802000006 讲义里有三个caveats 对risk 有不同finition correlation shift factor sensitivities unstable 为什么这里选risk更stable

2022-02-16 23:01 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019122802000006 robust assets allocation这个点该怎么理解?稳健的资产配置? 当时听课看讲义的时候就不是很懂。

2021-03-27 09:08 1 · 回答

对于第二个statement,还是想多问一下。 题目题干是use “risk factor-baseapproach”而不是用“MVO”的statement,按照这个思路,为什么statement 2 是MVO独有的缺点呢?我理解,risk-factor base法也是基于历史数据,在对private alternative asset classes是不是也只能采用到stale pricing的smootheta,因此,的出来也会overallocate to private alternative asset classes? 如此一来,是不是statement 2其实是两种方法共同的缺点吗? 请教下我哪里思考的不对吗?

2020-10-02 10:59 1 · 回答

请问statement1里面的内容在讲义什么地方呢?基础班和强化版讲义都没有找到

2020-09-23 11:37 2 · 回答