NO.PZ2023041102000041
问题如下：
Tremblay provides two justifications for adding Brazilian stocks rather than Ecuadoran stocks to her portfolio. She believes:
Brazil is sufficiently developed to be considered part of the group of developed nations but Ecuador is not. Investing in countries with lower per capita incomes that are members of the developed nations group should, over long periods of time, provide a higher rate of return than investing in countries with higher per capita income. Brazil is more open than Ecuador is to importing technology from advanced countries.
Tremblay's justifications for preferring Brazilian stocks to Ecuadoran stocks are most consistent with which economic growth model?
选项：
A.Neoclassical B.Endogenous C.Classical解释：
Tremblay's first justification describes "club convergence." Her second justification describes a second source of convergence–imitating or adopting technology already widely used in the advanced countries. Convergence is consistent with the neoclassical growth model.
特伦布雷的第一个理由是“俱乐部趋同”。她的第二个理由描述了趋同的第二个来源——模仿或采用已经在发达国家广泛使用的技术。收敛与新古典增长模型是一致的。
Brazil更愿意import technology这个不是endogenuous推崇的吗？根据neoclassical，反正技术进步是类似于“神迹”那么import不import对于neoclassical来说不就不重要吗？
