开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Pina · 2022年06月22日

结论

NO.PZ2021060201000023

问题如下:

Johnson is zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company),whose members collectively have a relatively basic understanding of the investment process,and their return targets are moderate. Therefore,two key investment considerations for zhou are Keeping low overhead costs and minimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou has been reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson discusses with zhou its objectivel of diversifying the company’s portfolio to include alternative assets.

Johnson and zhou review the best approach to determine the company's the asset allocation, including the traditional and risk-based approaches to defining the investment opportunity set.

Determine which approach to determine the best asset allocation for the company. Justify your response.

选项:

解释:

• The traditional approach is more appropriate because it is intuitive to describe the roles of various asset classes.

• It is easier for Johnson to explain this approach to the company because the members of the company only have a basic understanding of the investment process.

• This approach will make it easier to determine the relative roles played by alternative investments in the portfolio.

• As Zhou strives to keep management costs low, the risk-based approach is not appropriate.

• The traditional approach更合适,因为描述各种资产类别的角色是直观的。

• Johnson 更容易向the company 解释这种方法,因为 the company 的成员对投资过程只有基本的了解。

• 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合另类投资的相关发挥的角色。

• 由于zhou 力求保持较低的管理成本,基于the risk-based approach不合适。

The traditional approach更适合 这个公司。 the company 对另类投资缺乏学士能力,理解困难,但可能对传统的基于资产类别的方法有一定的了解。 列出各种资产类别的角色,Johnson 向the company 解释会更直观、更容易。


The traditional approachthe company 的流动性和运营考虑相关。 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合中另类投资的相关角色。 传统方法还可以让 IC 更好地了解各种资产类别的行为方式,以便Johnson 可以调整资产配置以解决问题。 传统方法将更容易实施,并且 the company 不想增加昂贵的内部资源,这对于 risk-based approach可能是必要的。


老师好 什么时候用traditional approaches 什么时候用risk based aporaches 有些什么结论?谢谢。

1 个答案
已采纳答案

伯恩_品职助教 · 2022年06月23日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


比如如果客户不懂另类投资,traditional更合适,如果更看重liquidity,traditional更合适。如果为了更好的做分散化,risk更合适,

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 500

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2021060201000023 问题如下 Johnson is zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company),whose members collectively have a relatively basicunrstanng of the investment process,antheir return targets are morate. Therefore,two key investment consirations for zhou are Keeping low overhecosts anminimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou hbeen reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson scusses with zhou its objectivel of versifying the company’s portfolio to inclu alternative assets. Johnson anzhou review the best approato termine the company's the asset allocation,inclung the trationanrisk-baseapproaches to fining the investmentopportunity set.termine whichapproato termine the best asset allocation for the company. Justify your response. • The trationapproais more appropriate because it is intuitive to scrithe roles of various asset classes.• It is easier for Johnson to explain this approato the company because the members of the company only have a basic unrstanng of the investment process.• This approawill make it easier to termine the relative roles playealternative investments in the portfolio.• Zhou strives to keep management costs low, the risk-baseapproais not appropriate.• The trationapproach更合适,因为描述各种资产类别的角色是直观的。• Johnson 更容易向the company 这种方法,因为 the company 的成员对投资过程只有基本的了解。• 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合另类投资的相关发挥的角色。• 由于zhou 力求保持较低的管理成本,基于the risk-baseapproach不合适。The trationapproach更适合 这个公司。 the company 对另类投资缺乏学士能力,理解困难,但可能对传统的基于资产类别的方法有一定的了解。 列出各种资产类别的角色,Johnson 向the company 会更直观、更容易。The trationapproach与 the company 的流动性和运营考虑相关。 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合中另类投资的相关角色。 传统方法还可以让 IC 更好地了解各种资产类别的行为方式,以便Johnson 可以调整资产配置以解决问题。 传统方法将更容易实施,并且 the company 不想增加昂贵的内部资源,这对于 risk-baseapproach可能是必要的。 老师,我看了答案感觉写的不太一样,答案中没有写tax的问题,以下是我的回答,请帮看一下trationapproais better. Trationapproaes not incur many in-house researcosts, anes not rely on mol thmneeto aust anrebalanthe allocation baseon the risk factors, witrequires more tpayments.

2024-07-14 23:21 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021060201000023 问题如下 Johnson is zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company),whose members collectively have a relatively basicunrstanng of the investment process,antheir return targets are morate. Therefore,two key investment consirations for zhou are Keeping low overhecosts anminimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou hbeen reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson scusses with zhou its objectivel of versifying the company’s portfolio to inclu alternative assets. Johnson anzhou review the best approato termine the company's the asset allocation,inclung the trationanrisk-baseapproaches to fining the investmentopportunity set.termine whichapproato termine the best asset allocation for the company. Justify your response. • The trationapproais more appropriate because it is intuitive to scrithe roles of various asset classes.• It is easier for Johnson to explain this approato the company because the members of the company only have a basic unrstanng of the investment process.• This approawill make it easier to termine the relative roles playealternative investments in the portfolio.• Zhou strives to keep management costs low, the risk-baseapproais not appropriate.• The trationapproach更合适,因为描述各种资产类别的角色是直观的。• Johnson 更容易向the company 这种方法,因为 the company 的成员对投资过程只有基本的了解。• 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合另类投资的相关发挥的角色。• 由于zhou 力求保持较低的管理成本,基于the risk-baseapproach不合适。The trationapproach更适合 这个公司。 the company 对另类投资缺乏学士能力,理解困难,但可能对传统的基于资产类别的方法有一定的了解。 列出各种资产类别的角色,Johnson 向the company 会更直观、更容易。The trationapproach与 the company 的流动性和运营考虑相关。 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合中另类投资的相关角色。 传统方法还可以让 IC 更好地了解各种资产类别的行为方式,以便Johnson 可以调整资产配置以解决问题。 传统方法将更容易实施,并且 the company 不想增加昂贵的内部资源,这对于 risk-baseapproach可能是必要的。 the trationapproais the best asset allocation for the company.because the trationapproais easy to communicate anit c maintain low overhecost.

2024-05-09 21:47 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2021060201000023 问题如下 Johnson is zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company),whose members collectively have a relatively basicunrstanng of the investment process,antheir return targets are morate. Therefore,two key investment consirations for zhou are Keeping low overhecosts anminimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou hbeen reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson scusses with zhou its objectivel of versifying the company’s portfolio to inclu alternative assets. Johnson anzhou review the best approato termine the company's the asset allocation,inclung the trationanrisk-baseapproaches to fining the investmentopportunity set.termine whichapproato termine the best asset allocation for the company. Justify your response. • The trationapproais more appropriate because it is intuitive to scrithe roles of various asset classes.• It is easier for Johnson to explain this approato the company because the members of the company only have a basic unrstanng of the investment process.• This approawill make it easier to termine the relative roles playealternative investments in the portfolio.• Zhou strives to keep management costs low, the risk-baseapproais not appropriate.• The trationapproach更合适,因为描述各种资产类别的角色是直观的。• Johnson 更容易向the company 这种方法,因为 the company 的成员对投资过程只有基本的了解。• 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合另类投资的相关发挥的角色。• 由于zhou 力求保持较低的管理成本,基于the risk-baseapproach不合适。The trationapproach更适合 这个公司。 the company 对另类投资缺乏学士能力,理解困难,但可能对传统的基于资产类别的方法有一定的了解。 列出各种资产类别的角色,Johnson 向the company 会更直观、更容易。The trationapproach与 the company 的流动性和运营考虑相关。 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合中另类投资的相关角色。 传统方法还可以让 IC 更好地了解各种资产类别的行为方式,以便Johnson 可以调整资产配置以解决问题。 传统方法将更容易实施,并且 the company 不想增加昂贵的内部资源,这对于 risk-baseapproach可能是必要的。 请问跟税有什么关系?

2023-08-26 11:59 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021060201000023 问题如下 Johnson is zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company),whose members collectively have a relatively basicunrstanng of the investment process,antheir return targets are morate. Therefore,two key investment consirations for zhou are Keeping low overhecosts anminimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou hbeen reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson scusses with zhou its objectivel of versifying the company’s portfolio to inclu alternative assets. Johnson anzhou review the best approato termine the company's the asset allocation,inclung the trationanrisk-baseapproaches to fining the investmentopportunity set.termine whichapproato termine the best asset allocation for the company. Justify your response. • The trationapproais more appropriate because it is intuitive to scrithe roles of various asset classes.• It is easier for Johnson to explain this approato the company because the members of the company only have a basic unrstanng of the investment process.• This approawill make it easier to termine the relative roles playealternative investments in the portfolio.• Zhou strives to keep management costs low, the risk-baseapproais not appropriate.• The trationapproach更合适,因为描述各种资产类别的角色是直观的。• Johnson 更容易向the company 这种方法,因为 the company 的成员对投资过程只有基本的了解。• 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合另类投资的相关发挥的角色。• 由于zhou 力求保持较低的管理成本,基于the risk-baseapproach不合适。The trationapproach更适合 这个公司。 the company 对另类投资缺乏学士能力,理解困难,但可能对传统的基于资产类别的方法有一定的了解。 列出各种资产类别的角色,Johnson 向the company 会更直观、更容易。The trationapproach与 the company 的流动性和运营考虑相关。 这种方法将更容易确定投资组合中另类投资的相关角色。 传统方法还可以让 IC 更好地了解各种资产类别的行为方式,以便Johnson 可以调整资产配置以解决问题。 传统方法将更容易实施,并且 the company 不想增加昂贵的内部资源,这对于 risk-baseapproach可能是必要的。 trationapproaches termines the best asset allocation for the company.the firm is relatively small investment manager company anits members have a relatively basic unrstanng of the investment process. so the complicaterisk baseapproaches is not suitable.the trationapproaches to termines the best asset allocation is simple to unrstananituitive.

2023-05-14 13:36 1 · 回答