问题如下图：
选项：
A. 
B. 
C. 
解释：
老师你好，整体逻辑看明白了，但是题干中关于allocation view和interest 调整分别指什么，如果第一句是对的，那么利息调整部分是不是应该没违反呢
Debrah_品职答疑助手 · 2020年11月23日
嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：
同学你好，请查看之前助教的回复：https://class.pzacademy.com/qa/27550
-------------------------------加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！
NO.PZ201604030300004105 No, it violates the stanr only with respeto allocation reviews. No, it violates the stanr only with respeto interest austments. A is correct. Client suitability for investment must revieweprior to allocation, not afterwar With respeto interest austments, clients who were incorrectly allocateshares must paifor the use of their cash; however, in no instanshoulclients suffer a loss because of allocation error the manager (this, have interest removefrom their portfolio even though shares are put in their account on a back-tebasis).请问这题关于allocation的陈述为什么不对？
老師 分不清cret/bit的中文 \"It also says thinterest will creteto accounts thhave been incorrectly allocateshares anbitefrom those accounts thshoulhave receiveshares.” 這裡 creteto accounts thhave been incorrectly allocateshares，就是指以後要給這些\"被胡亂分配到IPO股票的帳戶\"現金利息嗎? 然後bitefrom those accounts thshoulhave receiveshares. 就是這些現金利息要從這個原本該收到IPO股票的帳戶來支付? 就是 A帳戶是不要IPO股票 但莫名其妙分配到 B帳戶是要IPO股票 沒拿到 上述這句話就是，B帳戶要付錢給A帳戶少拿到的利息? 中文意思是這樣嗎 謝謝
这道题的cret anbit能详细下是什么情况吗？没太听懂。