开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

尼克内姆 · 2020年10月07日

问一道题:NO.PZ2016012101000112 [ CFA I ]

问题如下:

An analyst has calculated a ratio using as the numerator the sum of operating cash flow, interest, and taxes and as the denominator the amount of interest. What is this ratio, what does it measure, and what does it indicate?

选项:

A.

This ratio is an interest coverage ratio, measuring a company’s ability to meet its interest obligations and indicating a company’s solvency.

B.

This ratio is an effective tax ratio, measuring the amount of a company’s operating cash flow used for taxes and indicating a company’s efficiency in tax management.

C.

This ratio is an operating profitability ratio, measuring the operating cash flow generated accounting for taxes and interest and indicating a company’s liquidity.

解释:

A is correct.

This ratio is an interest coverage ratio, measuring a company’s ability to meet its interest obligations and indicating a company’s solvency. This coverage ratio is based on cash flow information; another common coverage ratio uses a measure based on the income statement (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization).

解析:题目问一个比率是用CFO+interest+tax除以interest,是个什么比率,用来衡量什么。

我们学过interest coverage ratio=EBIT/interest,分子的EBIT是NI+interest+tax,用CFO代替NI的话就是一个现金流角度的利息保障倍数,NI是企业报告的利润,不一定就是兜里实实在在的钱,而CFO是企业的现金流,比NI更能可靠衡量企业偿还利息的能力,这是一个长期偿债能力比率。所以选A。

cfo直接取代ni?这个也假设太意外了吧。

1 个答案

Olive_品职助教 · 2020年10月09日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


并不意外。实际上NI和CFO是分析师经常拿来分析的两个数据。

NI是企业损益,而CFO是账上实实在在的钱,正常情况下,NI里面包括已经收到的现金,也有非现金的损益,从分析师的角度看,其中收现的部分越高越好,如果企业NI很高,但是账上没什么钱,那么利润再高也是空中楼阁,所以这是分析师需要警惕的一个信号,说的有点多,总而言之就是这个假设不意外,很正常。


-------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!