开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

必过1030_ · 2020年07月07日

问一道题:NO.PZ2019103001000064

问题如下:

Susan Winslow manages bond funds denominated in US Dollars, Euros, and British Pounds. Each fund invests in sovereign bonds and related derivatives. Each fund can invest a portion of its assets outside its base currency market with or without hedging the currency exposure, but to date Winslow has not utilized this capacity. She believes she can also hedge bonds into currencies other than a portfolio’s base currency when she expects doing so will add value. However, the legal department has not yet confirmed this interpretation. If the lawyers disagree, Winslow will be limited to either unhedged positions or hedging into each portfolio’s base currency.

Winslow thinks the Mexican and Greek markets may offer attractive opportunities to enhance returns. Yields in these markets are given in Exhibit 1, along with those for the base currencies of her portfolios. The Greek rates are for euro-denominated government bonds priced at par. In the other markets, the yields apply to par sovereign bonds as well as to the fixed side of swaps versus six-month Libor (i.e., swap spreads are zero in each market). The six-month Libor rates also represent the rates at which investors can borrow or lend in each currency. Winslow observes that the five-year Treasury-note and the five-year German government note are the cheapest to deliver against their respective futures contracts expiring in six months.

Winslow expects yields in the US, Euro, UK, and Greek markets to remain stable over the next six months. She expects Mexican yields to decline to 7.0% at all maturities. Meanwhile, she projects that the Mexican Peso will depreciate by 2% against the Euro, the US Dollar will depreciate by 1% against the Euro, and the British Pound will remain stable versus the Euro. Winslow believes bonds of the same maturity may be viewed as having the same duration for purposes of identifying the most attractive positions.

Based on these views, Winslow is considering three types of trades. First, she is looking at carry trades, with or without taking currency exposure, among her three base currency markets. Each such trade will involve extending duration (e.g., lend long/borrow short) in no more than one market. Second, assuming the legal department confirms her interpretation of permissible currency hedging, she wants to identify the most attractive five-year bond and currency exposure for each of her three portfolios from among the five markets shown in Exhibit 1. Third, she wants to identify the most attractive five-year bond and hedging decision for each portfolio if she is only allowed to hedge into the portfolio’s base currency.

If Winslow is allowed to hedge into any of the currencies, she can obtain the highest expected returns by

选项:

A.

buying the Greek 5-year in each portfolio and hedging it into Pesos

B.

buying the Greek 5-year in each portfolio and hedging it into USD.

C.

buying the Mexican 5-year in each portfolio and not hedging the currency

解释:

A is correct.

As shown in the previous question, the Greek bond is the most attractive. Although the Peso is expected to depreciate by 2% against the EUR and the GBP and by 1% against the USD, this is less than the benefit of hedging EUR into MXN (+3.475%). The net currency component of the expected return is +1.475% = (3.475% – 2.0%) for the EUR and GBP portfolios and +2.475% = (3.475% – 1.0%) for the USD-denominated portfolio. Hedging into GBP would add only 0.175% for any of the portfolios. Hedging into USD would reduce expected return for any of the portfolios because the pick up on the hedge (+0.625%) is less than the expected depreciation (–1.0%) of the USD against the Euro and GBP.

B is incorrect. Hedging the Euro-denominated Greek bond into USD would reduce expected return for any of the portfolios because the pick on the hedge (+0.625%) is less than the expected depreciation of the USD against the Euro and GBP.

C is incorrect. As shown above, the Greek bond is more attractive than the Mexican bond.

  1. 如果hedge成MXN,可以多得3.475%,如果不hedge成MXN,只能多得2%,所以转换成MXN时选择hedge
  2. 如果hedge成USD,可以多得0.625%,如果不hedge成USD,却能多得1%,所以转换成USD时选择不hedge
  3. 6-month的floating rate就是各个货币的forward rate,对吧?


1 个答案

发亮_品职助教 · 2020年07月08日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


“如果hedge成MXN,可以多得3.475%,如果不hedge成MXN,只能多得2%,所以转换成MXN时选择hedge;如果hedge成USD,可以多得0.625%,如果不hedge成USD,却能多得1%,所以转换成USD时选择不hedge”


有一点问题,理解的话可以参考下面:

对于EUR账户、和GBP账户而言,我们先把EUR债券的收益Hedge成MXN,多得收益3.475%,这是通过外汇Forward hedge带来的额外收益;现在收益已经以MXN计价了;

但是,我们的Portfolio记账本位币分别是EUR和GBP,所以我们还需要把MXN的收益换回本位币。

对于EUR账户来讲,先把Greek bond的EUR收益Hedge成MXN,额外获得收益3.475%,因为预期期末MXN相对EUR贬值2%,我们再把MXN收益换回EUR损失2%;

这么算一来一回净赚:3.475% - 2% = 1.475%

所以,对于EUR账户,先把Greek bond的收益Hedge成MXN,期末再用预期的即期汇率将MXN转回EUR,额外赚取1.475%的收益;


对于GBP账户同理,先把Greek bond的EUR收益Hedge成MXN,额外获得收益3.475%,因为预期期末MXN相对GBP贬值2%,我们再把MXN收益换回GBP损失2%,所以这么算一来一回净赚:3.475% - 2% = 1.475%

所以,对于GBP账户,先把Greek bond的收益Hedge成MXN,期末再用预期的即期汇率将MXN转回GBP,额外赚取1.475%的收益;


 

对于USD账户来讲,先把Greek bond的EUR收益Hedge成MXN,获得额外收益3.475%;但期末我们始终还是要转回Portfolio的记账本位币USD;所以期末用预期的即期汇率把MXN收益转回USD。因为预期期末MXN相对USD贬值1%,我们再把MXN收益换回USD损失1%;

这么算一来一回净赚:3.475% - 1% =2.475%

所以,对于USD账户,先把Greek bond的收益Hedge成MXN,期末再用预期的即期汇率将MXN转回USD,额外赚取2.475%的收益;


以上的分析,就是答案这句话的意思:

Although the Peso is expected to depreciate by 2% against the EUR and the GBP and by 1% against the USD, this is less than the benefit of hedging EUR into MXN (+3.475%). The net currency component of the expected return is +1.475% = (3.475% – 2.0%) for the EUR and GBP portfolios and +2.475% = (3.475% – 1.0%) for the USD-denominated portfolio. 



从上面的分析可以看出,对于USD/GBP/EUR三个Portfolio,的确是先Hedge成MXN,可以给组合带来净收益,因此选项A的确能给组合带来收益,我们可以把A选项放到备选里,还需要判断下其他2个选项的收益是否更高。




再看B选项。

如果是Hedge成USD,通过Covered interest rate parity我们计算可知,将EUR hedge成美元带来的收益是0.175%

那对于GBP Portfolio来讲,将Greek bond的EUR收益Hedge成美元,额外收益是0.175%,但期末我们始终要用Portfolio的本位币核算,需要再把USD收益换回EUR,因此,我们用期末的预期汇率升贬换。因为预期期末美元相对EUR贬值1%,期末将USD收益换回EUR损失1%。

这么算一来一回净赚:0.175% - 1% ;

这样操作是亏钱的,因此对于EUR portfolio,Hedge成美元是不合算的。


同理,对于GBP Portfolio,我们把Greek bond的EUR收益Hedge成USD,带来的收益是0.175%,期末再将USD收益换回GBP,用预期的期末汇率换。

因为预期期末美元相对GBP贬值1%,所以期末将USD换汇GBP损失1%,

这么算一来一回净赚:0.175% - 1% ;

这样操作是亏钱的,因此对于GBP portfolio,Hedge成美元是不合算的。


对于USD Portfolio,将EUR的收益Hedge成USD带来的收益也只有0.175%,远不如A选项先Hedge成MXN带来的收益高。


C选项很容易判断不如A选项,这么看的话A选项就是最优的。即,对USD Portfolio、EUR Portfolio、GBP Portfolio来讲,都是Hedge成MXN最好。



“6-month的floating rate就是各个货币的forward rate,对吧?”


就是现在看的6个月利率。

根据Interest rate parity,外汇远期合约里面约定的外汇换汇价格和两国的利率是相关的。

那现在我们这道题的投资期只有6个月,为了对冲外汇风险,我们应该使用6个月的Currency forward,因此给这个Forward定价的利率也应该是6个月的利率。

那这样的话,把EUR hedge成MXN,就需要用到EUR和MXN的6个月利率;

经过一些变形(2级的内容,我们三级直接用下面结论),Hedge的收益可以近似用两国利率之差来算,那这样的话,把EUR hedge 成MXN,Hedge带来的收益为:

(7.10% - 0.15% )/2  = 3.475%;除以2是因为表格里都是年化利率。

同理,将EUR hedg成USD,带来的Hedge收益可以计算为:

(1.40% - 0.15%)/2 = 0.625%

也就是Hedge成哪个国家的货币,哪个国家的利率在减号的前面。把EUR Hedge成MXN,目标货币是MXN,所以再算Forward hedged收益时,MXN的利率在减号前面,所以收益是:

(7.10% - 0.15% )/2  = 3.475%


-------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!


  • 1

    回答
  • 4

    关注
  • 378

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019103001000064 老师,这道题的解题思路能用中文解答一遍么?

2021-09-03 21:28 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000064 这里的hee为什么用的是6个月的,而不是5年的利率?毕竟这里是买5年的债券啊

2021-06-10 14:03 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000064  the benefit of heing EUR into MXN (+3.475%).是怎样计算得来的?

2021-05-06 19:00 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000064 3.475%是怎么来的?还有其他的?完全没看懂答案,麻烦老师解答下。

2021-04-15 19:10 1 · 回答

buying the Greek 5-yein eaportfolio anheing it into US buying the Mexic5-yein eaportfolio annot heing the curren A is correct. shown in the previous question, the Greek bonis the most attractive. Although the Peso is expecteto preciate 2% against the EUR anthe Gan1% against the US this is less ththe benefit of heing EUR into MXN (+3.475%). The net currencomponent of the expectereturn is +1.475% = (3.475% – 2.0%) for the EUR anGportfolios an+2.475% = (3.475% – 1.0%) for the USnominateportfolio. Heing into Gwoula only 0.175% for any of the portfolios. Heing into USwoulreexpectereturn for any of the portfolios because the piup on the hee (+0.625%) is less ththe expectepreciation (–1.0%) of the USagainst the Euro anGBP. B is incorrect. Heing the Euro-nominateGreek boninto USwoulreexpectereturn for any of the portfolios because the pion the hee (+0.625%) is less ththe expectepreciation of the USagainst the Euro anGBP. C is incorrect. shown above, the Greek bonis more attractive ththe Mexicbon这题的第一步为什么是3.475%呢?为什么不用5年期Greek bon利率来算要用euro的floating rate来算呢?从计算过程来看感觉跟Greek bon啥关系啊这题

2020-11-02 08:29 1 · 回答