问题如下图：
选项：
A. 
B. 
C. 
解释：
老师这题我选对了 ，但是为什么A不能选，他是没有区分事实和观点
NO.PZ2016040301000007 问题如下 Willier is the researanalyst responsible for following Company X. All the information he haccumulateancumentesuggests ththe outlook for the company’s new procts is poor, so the stoshoulratea we\"hol\" ring lunch, however, Willier overhears a financianalyst from another firm whom he respects offer opinions thconfliwith Willier’s forecasts anexpectations. Upon returning to his office, Willier releases a strong \"buy\" recommention to the publiWillier: A.Violatethe Stanr failing to stinguish between facts anopinions in his recommention. B.Violatethe Stanr because he not have a reasonable anaquate basis for his recommention. C.Win full complianwith the Stanr. B is correct.This question relates to StanrV(–ligenanReasonable Basis. The opinion of another financianalyst is not aquate basis for Willier’s action in changing the recommention. Answer C is thus incorrect. So is answer A because, although it is true thmembers ancantes must stinguish between facts anopinions in recommentions, the question es not illustrate a violation of thnature. If the opinion overhearWillier hsparkehim to conaitionresearaninvestigation thjustifiea change of opinion, then a changerecommention woulappropriate. 框架图上面在Communication with Clients写了要区分fact和Opinion，用的例子就是halo effect，那什么时候要选“没能区分fact和opinion”呢？
NO.PZ2016040301000007 A也可以啊 就是没有区分事实和观点
