问题如下图：
选项：
A. 
B. 
C. 
解释：
答疑助手丽丽 · 2019年04月22日
纳什均衡的题目做法可以先假定一个不变 对比该情况下的另外两个。即先考虑S open，之后对比在S open 的情况下T利润最大的是哪个。
需要讨论T的，我们会在之后进行讨论，这种题目不要着急，慢慢比对就好。可参考下面的具体方法：
首先我们先假定SigmaSoft-Open,也就是说先只看第一列。在S-Open的情况下来寻找ThetaTech利润的最大化。（此时忽略S后的数字，只看T后的数字）。第一列下T数字最大的是600。锁定第一个大方框。
其次假定S-Prop。也就是说看第二列。第二列下只看T后的数字，最大为700。锁定第二个大方框。
第三部就是比较第一个方框和第二个方框。假定T-open，找出S后面的最大值，即650.为第二个方框。因此最终确定是SigmaSoft-Prop，ThetaTech-open
treepple · 2020年09月04日
这个感觉跟先找的比较对象关系很大，比如： 如果先假定T-Prop，那么锁定第一列下面方框，S-open； 其次假定T-open，那么锁定第二列上面方框，S-prop； 接下来怎么比较？
NO.PZ2016010802000070 问题如下 SigmaSoft anThetaTeare the minant makers of computer system software. The market htwo components: a large mass-market component in whimanis prisensitive, ana smaller performance-orientecomponent in whimanis muless prisensitive. SigmaSoft’s prois consireto technically superior. Eacompany cchoose one of two strategies:• Open architecture (Open): Mass market focus allowing other software venrs to velop procts for its platform.• Proprietary (Prop): Allow only its own software applications to run on its platform.penng upon the strategy eacompany selects, their profits woulbe:The Nash equilibrium for these companies is: A.proprietary for SigmaSoft anproprietary for ThetaTech. B.open architecture for SigmaSoft anproprietary for ThetaTech. C.proprietary for SigmaSoft anopen architecture for ThetaTech. is correct.In the Nash mol, eacompany consirs the other’s reaction in selecting its strategy. In equilibrium, neither company hincentive to change its strategy. ThetaTeis better off with open architecture regaress of whSigmaSoft cis. Given this choice, SigmaSoft is better off with a proprietary platform. Neither company will change its cision unilaterally.考点纳什均衡。如果 SigmaSoft 选择 Open 策略,，那么 ThetaTech选择 Open 策略可以获得更多的利润(600 300).如果 SigmaSoft 选择 Prop 策略，那么 ThetaTe选择Open策略可以获得更多的利润(700 400).所以对于 ThetaTe而言，它会选择 Open 策略。那么现在已确定 ThetaTe会选择 Open 策略，那么 SigmaSoft 选择Prop策略可以获得更多的利润(650 400). 为何不直接选两个都cheat也就是都是prop的情况呢？不是说Confess/confess就是Nash equilibrium吗？
NO.PZ2016010802000070 问题如下 SigmaSoft anThetaTeare the minant makers of computer system software. The market htwo components: a large mass-market component in whimanis prisensitive, ana smaller performance-orientecomponent in whimanis muless prisensitive. SigmaSoft’s prois consireto technically superior. Eacompany cchoose one of two strategies:• Open architecture (Open): Mass market focus allowing other software venrs to velop procts for its platform.• Proprietary (Prop): Allow only its own software applications to run on its platform.penng upon the strategy eacompany selects, their profits woulbe:The Nash equilibrium for these companies is: A.proprietary for SigmaSoft anproprietary for ThetaTech. B.open architecture for SigmaSoft anproprietary for ThetaTech. C.proprietary for SigmaSoft anopen architecture for ThetaTech. is correct.In the Nash mol, eacompany consirs the other’s reaction in selecting its strategy. In equilibrium, neither company hincentive to change its strategy. ThetaTeis better off with open architecture regaress of whSigmaSoft cis. Given this choice, SigmaSoft is better off with a proprietary platform. Neither company will change its cision unilaterally.考点纳什均衡。如果 SigmaSoft 选择 Open 策略,，那么 ThetaTech选择 Open 策略可以获得更多的利润(600 300).如果 SigmaSoft 选择 Prop 策略，那么 ThetaTe选择Open策略可以获得更多的利润(700 400).所以对于 ThetaTe而言，它会选择 Open 策略。那么现在已确定 ThetaTe会选择 Open 策略，那么 SigmaSoft 选择Prop策略可以获得更多的利润(650 400). RT
请问是不是画成这个图
请问这道题的情况是不是弱纳什均衡？